ASCEND 技术--改良的直接抽吸第一道技术,实现更快、更经济的机械血栓切除术。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Martin Lewis, Juveria Siddiqui, Sara Sciacca, Vishwajeet Singh, Jeremy Lynch, Thomas Booth, Naga Kandasamy, Parthiban Balasundaram
{"title":"ASCEND 技术--改良的直接抽吸第一道技术,实现更快、更经济的机械血栓切除术。","authors":"Martin Lewis, Juveria Siddiqui, Sara Sciacca, Vishwajeet Singh, Jeremy Lynch, Thomas Booth, Naga Kandasamy, Parthiban Balasundaram","doi":"10.1007/s00062-024-01469-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT) has been the standard for aspiration thrombectomy (AT) in anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (AC-LVO) with modifications of the technique based on devices used and difficulties encountered. We introduce the ASCEND technique (Aspiration with Steam-shaped Catheter, Excluding additioNal Devices), and hypothesize that it improves catheter navigation, leading to time and cost savings in MT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single institute, retrospective, pre-post intervention study, including consecutive patients with AC-LVO who underwent AT as first-pass technique. Patients were divided into two groups based on the first-pass technique attempted (ASCEND vs conventional ADAPT). Baseline characteristics, primary outcomes (first pass time, total procedure time, total additional devices and device cost) and secondary outcomes (recanalization, complications) were compared between groups. Multiple linear regression models were built for primary outcomes to look for the effect of steam-shaping when covariates are present to reflect real-world setting. Multi-national survey performed to introduce the technique and feedback obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ASCEND (n = 39) and cADAPT (n = 40) groups were similar in baseline clinical characteristics. Anterior genu and ophthalmic segment were crossed in 94.9%, clot reached in 84.6%, and entire MT procedure completed in 59.0% of patients of the ASCEND group without use of additional materials. Groups were similar in performance and safety indicators. ASCEND technique was superior to conventional ADAPT with less first-pass time (8.9 vs 14.7 min), total procedure time (20.2 vs 35.4 min), additional devices used (0 vs 3) and cost involved (2083 vs 5830 £) per procedure (all P < 0.05). Multiple linear regression models maintained improved primary outcomes with steam-shaping (all P < 0.05). Neurointerventionalists who tried ASCEND (n = 11) affirmed that it was safe and likely to save time and cost involved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ASCEND technique, involving a simple step of steam-shaping the aspiration catheter during MT can provide huge benefits in time and cost savings, without compromise of performance or safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":10391,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ASCEND Technique-A Modified Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique for a Faster and Cost-effective Mechanical Thrombectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Lewis, Juveria Siddiqui, Sara Sciacca, Vishwajeet Singh, Jeremy Lynch, Thomas Booth, Naga Kandasamy, Parthiban Balasundaram\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00062-024-01469-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT) has been the standard for aspiration thrombectomy (AT) in anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (AC-LVO) with modifications of the technique based on devices used and difficulties encountered. We introduce the ASCEND technique (Aspiration with Steam-shaped Catheter, Excluding additioNal Devices), and hypothesize that it improves catheter navigation, leading to time and cost savings in MT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single institute, retrospective, pre-post intervention study, including consecutive patients with AC-LVO who underwent AT as first-pass technique. Patients were divided into two groups based on the first-pass technique attempted (ASCEND vs conventional ADAPT). Baseline characteristics, primary outcomes (first pass time, total procedure time, total additional devices and device cost) and secondary outcomes (recanalization, complications) were compared between groups. Multiple linear regression models were built for primary outcomes to look for the effect of steam-shaping when covariates are present to reflect real-world setting. Multi-national survey performed to introduce the technique and feedback obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ASCEND (n = 39) and cADAPT (n = 40) groups were similar in baseline clinical characteristics. Anterior genu and ophthalmic segment were crossed in 94.9%, clot reached in 84.6%, and entire MT procedure completed in 59.0% of patients of the ASCEND group without use of additional materials. Groups were similar in performance and safety indicators. ASCEND technique was superior to conventional ADAPT with less first-pass time (8.9 vs 14.7 min), total procedure time (20.2 vs 35.4 min), additional devices used (0 vs 3) and cost involved (2083 vs 5830 £) per procedure (all P < 0.05). Multiple linear regression models maintained improved primary outcomes with steam-shaping (all P < 0.05). Neurointerventionalists who tried ASCEND (n = 11) affirmed that it was safe and likely to save time and cost involved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ASCEND technique, involving a simple step of steam-shaping the aspiration catheter during MT can provide huge benefits in time and cost savings, without compromise of performance or safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-024-01469-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-024-01469-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:直接抽吸第一道技术(ADAPT)一直是前循环大血管闭塞(AC-LVO)中抽吸血栓切除术(AT)的标准,并根据使用的设备和遇到的困难对该技术进行了修改。我们引入了 ASCEND 技术(使用蒸汽形导管抽吸,不包括附加装置),并假设该技术可改善导管导航,从而节省 MT 的时间和成本:这是一项单一机构、回顾性、干预前-干预后研究,包括连续接受AT作为首通技术的AC-LVO患者。根据所尝试的首次通过技术(ASCEND vs 传统 ADAPT)将患者分为两组。对两组患者的基线特征、主要结果(首次通过时间、总手术时间、额外装置总数和装置成本)和次要结果(再通、并发症)进行了比较。针对主要结果建立了多元线性回归模型,以寻找蒸汽整形在存在协变量时的效果,从而反映真实世界的情况。进行了多国调查以介绍该技术并获得反馈:结果:ASCEND 组(39 人)和 cADAPT 组(40 人)的基线临床特征相似。在 ASCEND 组中,94.9% 的患者跨越了前真皮和眼节,84.6% 的患者达到了血凝块,59.0% 的患者在不使用额外材料的情况下完成了整个 MT 过程。各组在性能和安全指标方面相似。ASCEND技术优于传统的ADAPT技术,首次通过时间(8.9分钟对14.7分钟)、总手术时间(20.2分钟对35.4分钟)、使用的额外设备(0个对3个)和每次手术涉及的费用(2083英镑对5830英镑)均少于传统的ADAPT技术(均为P 结论:ASCEND技术涉及的步骤更少,更安全:ASCEND 技术涉及在 MT 过程中对抽吸导管进行蒸汽整形这一简单步骤,可在不影响性能或安全性的前提下节省大量时间和成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The ASCEND Technique-A Modified Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique for a Faster and Cost-effective Mechanical Thrombectomy.

Purpose: Direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT) has been the standard for aspiration thrombectomy (AT) in anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (AC-LVO) with modifications of the technique based on devices used and difficulties encountered. We introduce the ASCEND technique (Aspiration with Steam-shaped Catheter, Excluding additioNal Devices), and hypothesize that it improves catheter navigation, leading to time and cost savings in MT.

Methods: This is a single institute, retrospective, pre-post intervention study, including consecutive patients with AC-LVO who underwent AT as first-pass technique. Patients were divided into two groups based on the first-pass technique attempted (ASCEND vs conventional ADAPT). Baseline characteristics, primary outcomes (first pass time, total procedure time, total additional devices and device cost) and secondary outcomes (recanalization, complications) were compared between groups. Multiple linear regression models were built for primary outcomes to look for the effect of steam-shaping when covariates are present to reflect real-world setting. Multi-national survey performed to introduce the technique and feedback obtained.

Results: ASCEND (n = 39) and cADAPT (n = 40) groups were similar in baseline clinical characteristics. Anterior genu and ophthalmic segment were crossed in 94.9%, clot reached in 84.6%, and entire MT procedure completed in 59.0% of patients of the ASCEND group without use of additional materials. Groups were similar in performance and safety indicators. ASCEND technique was superior to conventional ADAPT with less first-pass time (8.9 vs 14.7 min), total procedure time (20.2 vs 35.4 min), additional devices used (0 vs 3) and cost involved (2083 vs 5830 £) per procedure (all P < 0.05). Multiple linear regression models maintained improved primary outcomes with steam-shaping (all P < 0.05). Neurointerventionalists who tried ASCEND (n = 11) affirmed that it was safe and likely to save time and cost involved.

Conclusion: ASCEND technique, involving a simple step of steam-shaping the aspiration catheter during MT can provide huge benefits in time and cost savings, without compromise of performance or safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuroradiology
Clinical Neuroradiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuroradiology provides current information, original contributions, and reviews in the field of neuroradiology. An interdisciplinary approach is accomplished by diagnostic and therapeutic contributions related to associated subjects. The international coverage and relevance of the journal is underlined by its being the official journal of the German, Swiss, and Austrian Societies of Neuroradiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信