生态指标在支持退化溪流的保护和管理方面有多大作用?

IF 3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Biodiversity and Conservation Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1007/s10531-024-02933-7
Kate L Mathers, Christopher T Robinson, Matthew Hill, Carmen Kowarik, Jani Heino, Charl Deacon, Christine Weber
{"title":"生态指标在支持退化溪流的保护和管理方面有多大作用?","authors":"Kate L Mathers, Christopher T Robinson, Matthew Hill, Carmen Kowarik, Jani Heino, Charl Deacon, Christine Weber","doi":"10.1007/s10531-024-02933-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biodiversity loss is increasing worldwide, necessitating effective approaches to counteract negative trends. Here, we assessed aquatic macroinvertebrate biodiversity in two river catchments in Switzerland; one significantly degraded and associated with urbanisation and instream barriers, and one in a near-natural condition. Contrary to our expectations, environmental heterogeneity was lower in the near-natural stream, with enhanced productivity in the degraded system resulting in a greater range of environmental conditions. At face value, commonly employed alpha, beta and gamma biodiversity metrics suggested both catchments constituted healthy systems, with greater richness or comparable values recorded in the degraded system relative to the near-natural one. Further, functional metrics considered to be early indicators for anthropogenic disturbance, demonstrated no anticipated differences between degraded and near-natural catchments. However, investigating the identity of the taxa unique to each river system showed that anthropogenic degradation led to replacement of specialist, sensitive species indicative of pristine rivers, by generalist, pollution tolerant species. These replacements reflect a major alteration in community composition in the degraded system compared with the near-natural system. Total nitrogen and fine sediment were important in distinguishing the respective communities. We urge caution in biodiversity studies that employ numerical biodiversity metrics alone. Assessing just one aspect of diversity, such as richness, is not sufficient to track biodiversity changes associated with environmental stress. We advocate that biodiversity monitoring for conservation and management purposes must go beyond traditional richness biodiversity metrics, to include indices that incorporate detailed nuances of biotic communities that relates to taxon identity.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10531-024-02933-7.</p>","PeriodicalId":8843,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity and Conservation","volume":"33 14","pages":"3981-4002"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How effective are ecological metrics in supporting conservation and management in degraded streams?\",\"authors\":\"Kate L Mathers, Christopher T Robinson, Matthew Hill, Carmen Kowarik, Jani Heino, Charl Deacon, Christine Weber\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10531-024-02933-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Biodiversity loss is increasing worldwide, necessitating effective approaches to counteract negative trends. Here, we assessed aquatic macroinvertebrate biodiversity in two river catchments in Switzerland; one significantly degraded and associated with urbanisation and instream barriers, and one in a near-natural condition. Contrary to our expectations, environmental heterogeneity was lower in the near-natural stream, with enhanced productivity in the degraded system resulting in a greater range of environmental conditions. At face value, commonly employed alpha, beta and gamma biodiversity metrics suggested both catchments constituted healthy systems, with greater richness or comparable values recorded in the degraded system relative to the near-natural one. Further, functional metrics considered to be early indicators for anthropogenic disturbance, demonstrated no anticipated differences between degraded and near-natural catchments. However, investigating the identity of the taxa unique to each river system showed that anthropogenic degradation led to replacement of specialist, sensitive species indicative of pristine rivers, by generalist, pollution tolerant species. These replacements reflect a major alteration in community composition in the degraded system compared with the near-natural system. Total nitrogen and fine sediment were important in distinguishing the respective communities. We urge caution in biodiversity studies that employ numerical biodiversity metrics alone. Assessing just one aspect of diversity, such as richness, is not sufficient to track biodiversity changes associated with environmental stress. We advocate that biodiversity monitoring for conservation and management purposes must go beyond traditional richness biodiversity metrics, to include indices that incorporate detailed nuances of biotic communities that relates to taxon identity.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10531-024-02933-7.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biodiversity and Conservation\",\"volume\":\"33 14\",\"pages\":\"3981-4002\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568992/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biodiversity and Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02933-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodiversity and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02933-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物多样性的丧失在全球范围内日益加剧,因此有必要采取有效的方法来应对这一不利趋势。在这里,我们评估了瑞士两条河流流域的水生大型无脊椎动物生物多样性,其中一条因城市化和内流障碍而严重退化,另一条则接近自然状态。与我们的预期相反,在接近自然的河流中,环境异质性较低,而在退化的系统中,生产力的提高导致了更大范围的环境条件。从表面价值来看,常用的阿尔法、贝塔和伽马生物多样性指标表明,这两个流域都是健康的系统,相对于接近自然的系统,退化系统中的丰富度或可比数值更高。此外,被认为是人为干扰早期指标的功能指标也表明,退化集水区和近自然集水区之间没有预期的差异。然而,对每个河流系统特有分类群身份的调查显示,人为退化导致原始河流中的专性、敏感物种被通性、耐污染物种所取代。与接近自然的系统相比,这些替代反映了退化系统中群落组成的重大变化。总氮和细沉积物是区分各自群落的重要因素。我们敦促在生物多样性研究中仅采用生物多样性的数字指标要谨慎。仅评估多样性的一个方面(如丰富度)不足以跟踪与环境压力相关的生物多样性变化。我们主张,以保护和管理为目的的生物多样性监测必须超越传统的生物多样性丰富度指标,纳入与分类群特征相关的生物群落细微差别指数:在线版本包含补充材料,可查阅 10.1007/s10531-024-02933-7。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How effective are ecological metrics in supporting conservation and management in degraded streams?

Biodiversity loss is increasing worldwide, necessitating effective approaches to counteract negative trends. Here, we assessed aquatic macroinvertebrate biodiversity in two river catchments in Switzerland; one significantly degraded and associated with urbanisation and instream barriers, and one in a near-natural condition. Contrary to our expectations, environmental heterogeneity was lower in the near-natural stream, with enhanced productivity in the degraded system resulting in a greater range of environmental conditions. At face value, commonly employed alpha, beta and gamma biodiversity metrics suggested both catchments constituted healthy systems, with greater richness or comparable values recorded in the degraded system relative to the near-natural one. Further, functional metrics considered to be early indicators for anthropogenic disturbance, demonstrated no anticipated differences between degraded and near-natural catchments. However, investigating the identity of the taxa unique to each river system showed that anthropogenic degradation led to replacement of specialist, sensitive species indicative of pristine rivers, by generalist, pollution tolerant species. These replacements reflect a major alteration in community composition in the degraded system compared with the near-natural system. Total nitrogen and fine sediment were important in distinguishing the respective communities. We urge caution in biodiversity studies that employ numerical biodiversity metrics alone. Assessing just one aspect of diversity, such as richness, is not sufficient to track biodiversity changes associated with environmental stress. We advocate that biodiversity monitoring for conservation and management purposes must go beyond traditional richness biodiversity metrics, to include indices that incorporate detailed nuances of biotic communities that relates to taxon identity.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10531-024-02933-7.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biodiversity and Conservation
Biodiversity and Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
153
审稿时长
9-18 weeks
期刊介绍: Biodiversity and Conservation is an international journal that publishes articles on all aspects of biological diversity-its description, analysis and conservation, and its controlled rational use by humankind. The scope of Biodiversity and Conservation is wide and multidisciplinary, and embraces all life-forms. The journal presents research papers, as well as editorials, comments and research notes on biodiversity and conservation, and contributions dealing with the practicalities of conservation management, economic, social and political issues. The journal provides a forum for examining conflicts between sustainable development and human dependence on biodiversity in agriculture, environmental management and biotechnology, and encourages contributions from developing countries to promote broad global perspectives on matters of biodiversity and conservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信