Faramarz Jalili, Nichole Austin, M Ruth Lavergne, Mohammad Hajizadeh
{"title":"加拿大安大略省参与结直肠癌筛查的社会经济不平等现象:分解分析。","authors":"Faramarz Jalili, Nichole Austin, M Ruth Lavergne, Mohammad Hajizadeh","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between socioeconomic status and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in Canada remains poorly understood. This study aims to measure and explain the extent of socioeconomic inequalities in CRC screening participation in Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study assesses socioeconomic inequalities in CRC screening uptake in Ontario among adults aged 50 to 74 years (n=12,039) utilizing cross-sectional data from the 2017-2018 Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS). The Wagstaff Index (WI) and the Erreygers Index (EI) were used to quantify and decompose income-related inequality in CRC screening participation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed an overall CRC screening rate of 71.7%, with higher rates among females (78.4%) compared to males (69.4%). The positive values of the WI (0.193; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.170 to 0.215) and the EI (0.156; 95% CI: 0.138 to 0.174) indicated a pro-rich inequality in CRC screening participation in Ontario (i.e., screening is more concentrated among wealthier individuals). The decomposition analysis identified income (71.61%), education (8.61%), and language barriers with healthcare providers (5.76%) as the primary factors contributing to the observed income-related inequality in CRC screening participation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Income is the primary driver of socioeconomic inequality, requiring targeted strategies to boost screening rates among low-income residents. Addressing education and language barriers through awareness initiatives and language support can reduce socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening uptake in Ontario.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Our study reveals significant socioeconomic inequality in colorectal cancer screening in Ontario, driven by income, education, and language barriers, underscoring the need for targeted interventions to promote equitable access.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socioeconomic Inequalities in Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening in Ontario, Canada: A decomposition analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Faramarz Jalili, Nichole Austin, M Ruth Lavergne, Mohammad Hajizadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between socioeconomic status and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in Canada remains poorly understood. This study aims to measure and explain the extent of socioeconomic inequalities in CRC screening participation in Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study assesses socioeconomic inequalities in CRC screening uptake in Ontario among adults aged 50 to 74 years (n=12,039) utilizing cross-sectional data from the 2017-2018 Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS). The Wagstaff Index (WI) and the Erreygers Index (EI) were used to quantify and decompose income-related inequality in CRC screening participation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed an overall CRC screening rate of 71.7%, with higher rates among females (78.4%) compared to males (69.4%). The positive values of the WI (0.193; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.170 to 0.215) and the EI (0.156; 95% CI: 0.138 to 0.174) indicated a pro-rich inequality in CRC screening participation in Ontario (i.e., screening is more concentrated among wealthier individuals). The decomposition analysis identified income (71.61%), education (8.61%), and language barriers with healthcare providers (5.76%) as the primary factors contributing to the observed income-related inequality in CRC screening participation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Income is the primary driver of socioeconomic inequality, requiring targeted strategies to boost screening rates among low-income residents. Addressing education and language barriers through awareness initiatives and language support can reduce socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening uptake in Ontario.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Our study reveals significant socioeconomic inequality in colorectal cancer screening in Ontario, driven by income, education, and language barriers, underscoring the need for targeted interventions to promote equitable access.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1239\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1239","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening in Ontario, Canada: A decomposition analysis.
Background: The relationship between socioeconomic status and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in Canada remains poorly understood. This study aims to measure and explain the extent of socioeconomic inequalities in CRC screening participation in Ontario, Canada.
Methods: This study assesses socioeconomic inequalities in CRC screening uptake in Ontario among adults aged 50 to 74 years (n=12,039) utilizing cross-sectional data from the 2017-2018 Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS). The Wagstaff Index (WI) and the Erreygers Index (EI) were used to quantify and decompose income-related inequality in CRC screening participation.
Results: The results revealed an overall CRC screening rate of 71.7%, with higher rates among females (78.4%) compared to males (69.4%). The positive values of the WI (0.193; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.170 to 0.215) and the EI (0.156; 95% CI: 0.138 to 0.174) indicated a pro-rich inequality in CRC screening participation in Ontario (i.e., screening is more concentrated among wealthier individuals). The decomposition analysis identified income (71.61%), education (8.61%), and language barriers with healthcare providers (5.76%) as the primary factors contributing to the observed income-related inequality in CRC screening participation.
Conclusion: Income is the primary driver of socioeconomic inequality, requiring targeted strategies to boost screening rates among low-income residents. Addressing education and language barriers through awareness initiatives and language support can reduce socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening uptake in Ontario.
Impact: Our study reveals significant socioeconomic inequality in colorectal cancer screening in Ontario, driven by income, education, and language barriers, underscoring the need for targeted interventions to promote equitable access.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.