重新审视危机:对非股权激励计划暂停的实证分析

IF 13.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Arvind Rangarajan, Jiri Svec, Sean Foley, Stefan Trück
{"title":"重新审视危机:对非股权激励计划暂停的实证分析","authors":"Arvind Rangarajan, Jiri Svec, Sean Foley, Stefan Trück","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the suspension of the Australian National Electricity Market (NEM) that occurred in June 2022. Our study aims to (i) identify the key factors leading to the market suspension, (ii) investigate the behaviour of market participants and price outcomes during this period, and (iii) provide important recommendations for policy and decision-makers related to avoiding or managing crises in wholesale electricity markets. We contribute to the literature by focusing on a severe market crisis event, thoroughly examining generator bidding, dispatch and spot price dynamics over different time periods around the suspension event. Our study examines these dynamics at a high degree of granularity, presenting results at the generator fuel level and for different sub-samples, including the pre-crisis period, the built-up of the crisis, the suspension period, and after the crisis. Our empirical findings highlight that policymaking, in particular the set level of the administered price cap, as well as a lack of reliable substitutes for fossil fuel generation, were leading causes for the suspension. Further, our analysis finds limited evidence of strategic bidding on average but does not deny its possibility at granular levels. Finally, we propose policy implications based on our findings to ensure a well-functioning NEM that can facilitate a smooth energy transition.","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting the crisis: An empirical analysis of the NEM suspension\",\"authors\":\"Arvind Rangarajan, Jiri Svec, Sean Foley, Stefan Trück\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107983\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the suspension of the Australian National Electricity Market (NEM) that occurred in June 2022. Our study aims to (i) identify the key factors leading to the market suspension, (ii) investigate the behaviour of market participants and price outcomes during this period, and (iii) provide important recommendations for policy and decision-makers related to avoiding or managing crises in wholesale electricity markets. We contribute to the literature by focusing on a severe market crisis event, thoroughly examining generator bidding, dispatch and spot price dynamics over different time periods around the suspension event. Our study examines these dynamics at a high degree of granularity, presenting results at the generator fuel level and for different sub-samples, including the pre-crisis period, the built-up of the crisis, the suspension period, and after the crisis. Our empirical findings highlight that policymaking, in particular the set level of the administered price cap, as well as a lack of reliable substitutes for fossil fuel generation, were leading causes for the suspension. Further, our analysis finds limited evidence of strategic bidding on average but does not deny its possibility at granular levels. Finally, we propose policy implications based on our findings to ensure a well-functioning NEM that can facilitate a smooth energy transition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107983\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107983","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了 2022 年 6 月发生的澳大利亚全国电力市场(NEM)暂停事件。我们的研究旨在:(i) 确定导致市场暂停的关键因素;(ii) 调查在此期间市场参与者的行为和价格结果;(iii) 为政策和决策者提供有关避免或管理电力批发市场危机的重要建议。我们以严重的市场危机事件为重点,深入研究了暂停事件前后不同时期的发电机投标、调度和现货价格动态,为相关文献做出了贡献。我们的研究对这些动态进行了高度细化的考察,给出了发电机燃料层面和不同子样本的结果,包括危机前、危机积累期、暂停期和危机后。我们的实证研究结果表明,政策制定,尤其是管理价格上限的设定水平,以及化石燃料发电缺乏可靠的替代品,是导致暂停的主要原因。此外,我们的分析还发现,平均而言,战略竞标的证据有限,但并不否认其在细微层面上的可能性。最后,我们根据研究结果提出了政策建议,以确保运行良好的新能源市场机制能够促进能源平稳过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revisiting the crisis: An empirical analysis of the NEM suspension
This paper examines the suspension of the Australian National Electricity Market (NEM) that occurred in June 2022. Our study aims to (i) identify the key factors leading to the market suspension, (ii) investigate the behaviour of market participants and price outcomes during this period, and (iii) provide important recommendations for policy and decision-makers related to avoiding or managing crises in wholesale electricity markets. We contribute to the literature by focusing on a severe market crisis event, thoroughly examining generator bidding, dispatch and spot price dynamics over different time periods around the suspension event. Our study examines these dynamics at a high degree of granularity, presenting results at the generator fuel level and for different sub-samples, including the pre-crisis period, the built-up of the crisis, the suspension period, and after the crisis. Our empirical findings highlight that policymaking, in particular the set level of the administered price cap, as well as a lack of reliable substitutes for fossil fuel generation, were leading causes for the suspension. Further, our analysis finds limited evidence of strategic bidding on average but does not deny its possibility at granular levels. Finally, we propose policy implications based on our findings to ensure a well-functioning NEM that can facilitate a smooth energy transition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信