{"title":"有和没有工作恐惧症焦虑症的神经系统疾病患者的能力限制和工作能力","authors":"Anne Henning, Beate Muschalla","doi":"10.1155/2024/6674418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Objective:</b> Work phobic anxiety can occur as an additional problem in any somatic illness and is often associated with work capacity limitations and sick leave. This study investigates work-related capacity limitations in patients with and without work phobic anxiety who are undergoing neurological rehabilitation. It was conducted in the rehabilitation facility Brandenburgklinik Berlin-Brandenburg in Germany.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Work phobic anxiety was assessed with the Workplace Phobia Scale (WPS). The response rate was 69.51%. Capacity limitations (Mini-ICF-APP) were compared between 19 patients with neurological conditions and work phobic anxiety and 209 patients with neurological conditions without work phobic anxiety. Work participation restrictions were examined and compared using the self- and observer rated Index for Measuring Participation (IMET, IMEP-O). The work ability assessments regarding the patients’ last occupation as well as the general labor market were conducted by the treating physicians as part of their medical reports and compared between the subgroups. The work ability was rated as less than 3 h, 3 to less than 6 h, or 6 h or more a day for more than 6 months, with the latter being an indication for prognostic work ability and potential reintegration into the labor market. This is a common classification in sociomedical assessments in Germany.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Independent <i>t</i>-tests showed that patients with work phobic anxiety were significantly more limited in their planning and structuring of tasks (<i>t</i>[20.104] = 2.310, <i>p</i> = 0.032, <i>d</i> = 0.68), flexibility (<i>t</i>[217] = 3.586, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.86), assertiveness (<i>t</i>[19.613] = 2.151, <i>p</i> = 0.044, <i>d</i> = 0.70), group integration (<i>t</i>[19.534] = 2.274, <i>p</i> = 0.034, <i>d</i> = 0.76), and mobility capacities (<i>t</i>[16.616] = 2.198, <i>p</i> = 0.042, <i>d</i> = 0.76) and significantly more restricted in participating in work compared to patients without work phobic anxiety (IMEP-O: <i>t</i>[23.549] = 2.298, <i>p</i> = 0.031, <i>d</i> = 0.40; IMET: <i>t</i>[27.191] = 4.581, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.78). Chi-squared tests revealed no significant differences in the physicians’ work ability assessments between patients with and without work phobic anxiety.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> While work phobic anxiety seems to not be decisive concerning early retirement assessments, it is associated with greater capacity limitations and work participation restrictions. The results highlight the need for identifying work phobic anxiety and associated capacity limitations in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":6939,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/6674418","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capacity Limitations and Work Ability in Patients With Neurological Conditions With and Without Work Phobic Anxiety\",\"authors\":\"Anne Henning, Beate Muschalla\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/6674418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Objective:</b> Work phobic anxiety can occur as an additional problem in any somatic illness and is often associated with work capacity limitations and sick leave. This study investigates work-related capacity limitations in patients with and without work phobic anxiety who are undergoing neurological rehabilitation. It was conducted in the rehabilitation facility Brandenburgklinik Berlin-Brandenburg in Germany.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Work phobic anxiety was assessed with the Workplace Phobia Scale (WPS). The response rate was 69.51%. Capacity limitations (Mini-ICF-APP) were compared between 19 patients with neurological conditions and work phobic anxiety and 209 patients with neurological conditions without work phobic anxiety. Work participation restrictions were examined and compared using the self- and observer rated Index for Measuring Participation (IMET, IMEP-O). The work ability assessments regarding the patients’ last occupation as well as the general labor market were conducted by the treating physicians as part of their medical reports and compared between the subgroups. The work ability was rated as less than 3 h, 3 to less than 6 h, or 6 h or more a day for more than 6 months, with the latter being an indication for prognostic work ability and potential reintegration into the labor market. This is a common classification in sociomedical assessments in Germany.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Independent <i>t</i>-tests showed that patients with work phobic anxiety were significantly more limited in their planning and structuring of tasks (<i>t</i>[20.104] = 2.310, <i>p</i> = 0.032, <i>d</i> = 0.68), flexibility (<i>t</i>[217] = 3.586, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.86), assertiveness (<i>t</i>[19.613] = 2.151, <i>p</i> = 0.044, <i>d</i> = 0.70), group integration (<i>t</i>[19.534] = 2.274, <i>p</i> = 0.034, <i>d</i> = 0.76), and mobility capacities (<i>t</i>[16.616] = 2.198, <i>p</i> = 0.042, <i>d</i> = 0.76) and significantly more restricted in participating in work compared to patients without work phobic anxiety (IMEP-O: <i>t</i>[23.549] = 2.298, <i>p</i> = 0.031, <i>d</i> = 0.40; IMET: <i>t</i>[27.191] = 4.581, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.78). Chi-squared tests revealed no significant differences in the physicians’ work ability assessments between patients with and without work phobic anxiety.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> While work phobic anxiety seems to not be decisive concerning early retirement assessments, it is associated with greater capacity limitations and work participation restrictions. The results highlight the need for identifying work phobic anxiety and associated capacity limitations in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/6674418\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/6674418\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/6674418","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Capacity Limitations and Work Ability in Patients With Neurological Conditions With and Without Work Phobic Anxiety
Objective: Work phobic anxiety can occur as an additional problem in any somatic illness and is often associated with work capacity limitations and sick leave. This study investigates work-related capacity limitations in patients with and without work phobic anxiety who are undergoing neurological rehabilitation. It was conducted in the rehabilitation facility Brandenburgklinik Berlin-Brandenburg in Germany.
Methods: Work phobic anxiety was assessed with the Workplace Phobia Scale (WPS). The response rate was 69.51%. Capacity limitations (Mini-ICF-APP) were compared between 19 patients with neurological conditions and work phobic anxiety and 209 patients with neurological conditions without work phobic anxiety. Work participation restrictions were examined and compared using the self- and observer rated Index for Measuring Participation (IMET, IMEP-O). The work ability assessments regarding the patients’ last occupation as well as the general labor market were conducted by the treating physicians as part of their medical reports and compared between the subgroups. The work ability was rated as less than 3 h, 3 to less than 6 h, or 6 h or more a day for more than 6 months, with the latter being an indication for prognostic work ability and potential reintegration into the labor market. This is a common classification in sociomedical assessments in Germany.
Results: Independent t-tests showed that patients with work phobic anxiety were significantly more limited in their planning and structuring of tasks (t[20.104] = 2.310, p = 0.032, d = 0.68), flexibility (t[217] = 3.586, p < 0.001, d = 0.86), assertiveness (t[19.613] = 2.151, p = 0.044, d = 0.70), group integration (t[19.534] = 2.274, p = 0.034, d = 0.76), and mobility capacities (t[16.616] = 2.198, p = 0.042, d = 0.76) and significantly more restricted in participating in work compared to patients without work phobic anxiety (IMEP-O: t[23.549] = 2.298, p = 0.031, d = 0.40; IMET: t[27.191] = 4.581, p < 0.001, d = 0.78). Chi-squared tests revealed no significant differences in the physicians’ work ability assessments between patients with and without work phobic anxiety.
Conclusions: While work phobic anxiety seems to not be decisive concerning early retirement assessments, it is associated with greater capacity limitations and work participation restrictions. The results highlight the need for identifying work phobic anxiety and associated capacity limitations in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica aims to publish manuscripts of a high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work in neuroscience. The journal''s scope is to act as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science or practice of this subject area. Papers in English will be welcomed, especially those which bring new knowledge and observations from the application of therapies or techniques in the combating of a broad spectrum of neurological disease and neurodegenerative disorders. Relevant articles on the basic neurosciences will be published where they extend present understanding of such disorders. Priority will be given to review of topical subjects. Papers requiring rapid publication because of their significance and timeliness will be included as ''Clinical commentaries'' not exceeding two printed pages, as will ''Clinical commentaries'' of sufficient general interest. Debate within the speciality is encouraged in the form of ''Letters to the editor''. All submitted manuscripts falling within the overall scope of the journal will be assessed by suitably qualified referees.