{"title":"评估玻璃纤维增强塑料复合材料电杆抗弯强度的改进程序","authors":"Filip Broniewicz, Mirosław Broniewicz","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fibreglass lighting poles have gained a considerable amount of popularity in the market due to their advantages, and interest in them continues to grow. Consequently, the challenge of ensuring their safe design is becoming increasingly important. However, the current standard design procedure is not sufficient, because it does not consider one of the most common failure modes of composite poles, namely local buckling in the vicinity of the inspection opening. A verification of the standard’s calculated values has been done with the use of experimental testing. The calculated design bending strength was three times higher than the actual bending strength for 3.0 m high poles and twice higher for 9.0 m high poles. This paper proposes an improved method for estimating the bending resistance of composite poles with inspection openings. The method was developed using results from tests on full-scale poles, material sample tests, and experiments in a FEM environment. The proposed method provides more accurate results than the procedure for assessing the bending strength of these poles as presented in the EN 40–3–3 standard. The bending resistance value obtained using the modified calculation method is higher than the experimental value by an average of 6.6 %.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"455 ","pages":"Article 139182"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modified procedure for assessing the bending strength of composite GFRP poles\",\"authors\":\"Filip Broniewicz, Mirosław Broniewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Fibreglass lighting poles have gained a considerable amount of popularity in the market due to their advantages, and interest in them continues to grow. Consequently, the challenge of ensuring their safe design is becoming increasingly important. However, the current standard design procedure is not sufficient, because it does not consider one of the most common failure modes of composite poles, namely local buckling in the vicinity of the inspection opening. A verification of the standard’s calculated values has been done with the use of experimental testing. The calculated design bending strength was three times higher than the actual bending strength for 3.0 m high poles and twice higher for 9.0 m high poles. This paper proposes an improved method for estimating the bending resistance of composite poles with inspection openings. The method was developed using results from tests on full-scale poles, material sample tests, and experiments in a FEM environment. The proposed method provides more accurate results than the procedure for assessing the bending strength of these poles as presented in the EN 40–3–3 standard. The bending resistance value obtained using the modified calculation method is higher than the experimental value by an average of 6.6 %.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Construction and Building Materials\",\"volume\":\"455 \",\"pages\":\"Article 139182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Construction and Building Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061824043241\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061824043241","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
玻璃纤维照明灯杆因其优点而在市场上大受欢迎,人们对它们的兴趣也与日俱增。因此,如何确保其安全设计变得越来越重要。然而,目前的标准设计程序并不充分,因为它没有考虑到复合材料灯杆最常见的失效模式之一,即检查口附近的局部屈曲。通过实验测试对标准的计算值进行了验证。对于 3.0 米高的电杆,计算得出的设计抗弯强度是实际抗弯强度的三倍,而对于 9.0 米高的电杆,计算得出的设计抗弯强度是实际抗弯强度的两倍。本文提出了一种改进的方法,用于估算带有检查开口的复合材料电杆的抗弯强度。该方法是利用全尺寸电杆测试、材料样品测试和有限元环境实验的结果开发出来的。与 EN 40-3-3 标准中评估这些电杆抗弯强度的程序相比,所提出的方法能提供更精确的结果。使用修改后的计算方法得出的抗弯强度值比实验值平均高出 6.6%。
Modified procedure for assessing the bending strength of composite GFRP poles
Fibreglass lighting poles have gained a considerable amount of popularity in the market due to their advantages, and interest in them continues to grow. Consequently, the challenge of ensuring their safe design is becoming increasingly important. However, the current standard design procedure is not sufficient, because it does not consider one of the most common failure modes of composite poles, namely local buckling in the vicinity of the inspection opening. A verification of the standard’s calculated values has been done with the use of experimental testing. The calculated design bending strength was three times higher than the actual bending strength for 3.0 m high poles and twice higher for 9.0 m high poles. This paper proposes an improved method for estimating the bending resistance of composite poles with inspection openings. The method was developed using results from tests on full-scale poles, material sample tests, and experiments in a FEM environment. The proposed method provides more accurate results than the procedure for assessing the bending strength of these poles as presented in the EN 40–3–3 standard. The bending resistance value obtained using the modified calculation method is higher than the experimental value by an average of 6.6 %.
期刊介绍:
Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged.
Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.