{"title":"摩洛哥一家医院儿科数字放射摄影的辐射剂量和癌症风险评估","authors":"Noureddine Elamri, Mustapha bougteb, Maroine Tahiri, Redouane El Baydaoui, Mounir Mkimel","doi":"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.112352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pediatric radiography is the first line of most diagnostic examinations and an effective tool that provides important information about the patient's health status.</div><div>This study aims to investigate the Entrance Surface Dose (ESD) and organ doses for pediatric patients undergoing imaging procedures of the abdomen, chest, pelvis, and nasopharynx using Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeters OSLDs and an anthropomorphic phantom.</div><div>An ATOM pediatric 5-year-old phantom was imaged using a Digital Radiography (DR) based on similar conditions of routine radiography (exposure parameters kVp, mAs, SID: Source Image receptor Distance). The OSLDs were inserted at the appropriate sites to measure localized doses in the sensitive organs.</div><div>The results showed that the entrance surface doses for the pediatric patients were 0.17 ± 0.03 mGy, 0.10 ± 0.00 mGy, 0.46 ± 0.00 mGy, and 0.42 ± 0.02 mGy, respectively, for the abdomen (AP), chest (AP), pelvis (AP), and nasopharynx (LAT). The range of organ doses were 0.05–0.45 mGy, 0.01–0.44 mGy, 0.13–1.05 mGy, and 0.084–0.99 mGy for the abdomen, chest, pelvis, and nasopharynx examination, respectively. Effective doses (ED) were 0.088 ± 0.021 mSv, 0.011 ± 0.004 mSv, 0.058 ± 0.007 mSv, and 0.044 ± 0.024 mSv for the abdomen, chest, pelvis, and nasopharynx examination, respectively.</div><div>The likelihood of cancer, as determined by the ICRP health risk model with a rate of 500 cases per 10 000 person-Sv (5% per sievert), estimated that a 0.015 case of health risk (0.3 person-Sv × 5% per sievert) may in the future be attributable to four X-ray pediatric procedures conducted in 2022.</div><div>The ESD, ED, and organ dose values are deemed acceptable compared to those reported in the literature. Although the risk of incidence and mortality from cancer during life is minimal, it should not be ignored.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20861,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","volume":"227 ","pages":"Article 112352"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of radiation dose and cancer risk for paediatric digital radiography in a Moroccan hospital\",\"authors\":\"Noureddine Elamri, Mustapha bougteb, Maroine Tahiri, Redouane El Baydaoui, Mounir Mkimel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.112352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Pediatric radiography is the first line of most diagnostic examinations and an effective tool that provides important information about the patient's health status.</div><div>This study aims to investigate the Entrance Surface Dose (ESD) and organ doses for pediatric patients undergoing imaging procedures of the abdomen, chest, pelvis, and nasopharynx using Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeters OSLDs and an anthropomorphic phantom.</div><div>An ATOM pediatric 5-year-old phantom was imaged using a Digital Radiography (DR) based on similar conditions of routine radiography (exposure parameters kVp, mAs, SID: Source Image receptor Distance). The OSLDs were inserted at the appropriate sites to measure localized doses in the sensitive organs.</div><div>The results showed that the entrance surface doses for the pediatric patients were 0.17 ± 0.03 mGy, 0.10 ± 0.00 mGy, 0.46 ± 0.00 mGy, and 0.42 ± 0.02 mGy, respectively, for the abdomen (AP), chest (AP), pelvis (AP), and nasopharynx (LAT). The range of organ doses were 0.05–0.45 mGy, 0.01–0.44 mGy, 0.13–1.05 mGy, and 0.084–0.99 mGy for the abdomen, chest, pelvis, and nasopharynx examination, respectively. Effective doses (ED) were 0.088 ± 0.021 mSv, 0.011 ± 0.004 mSv, 0.058 ± 0.007 mSv, and 0.044 ± 0.024 mSv for the abdomen, chest, pelvis, and nasopharynx examination, respectively.</div><div>The likelihood of cancer, as determined by the ICRP health risk model with a rate of 500 cases per 10 000 person-Sv (5% per sievert), estimated that a 0.015 case of health risk (0.3 person-Sv × 5% per sievert) may in the future be attributable to four X-ray pediatric procedures conducted in 2022.</div><div>The ESD, ED, and organ dose values are deemed acceptable compared to those reported in the literature. Although the risk of incidence and mortality from cancer during life is minimal, it should not be ignored.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Physics and Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"227 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Physics and Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X24008442\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X24008442","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of radiation dose and cancer risk for paediatric digital radiography in a Moroccan hospital
Pediatric radiography is the first line of most diagnostic examinations and an effective tool that provides important information about the patient's health status.
This study aims to investigate the Entrance Surface Dose (ESD) and organ doses for pediatric patients undergoing imaging procedures of the abdomen, chest, pelvis, and nasopharynx using Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeters OSLDs and an anthropomorphic phantom.
An ATOM pediatric 5-year-old phantom was imaged using a Digital Radiography (DR) based on similar conditions of routine radiography (exposure parameters kVp, mAs, SID: Source Image receptor Distance). The OSLDs were inserted at the appropriate sites to measure localized doses in the sensitive organs.
The results showed that the entrance surface doses for the pediatric patients were 0.17 ± 0.03 mGy, 0.10 ± 0.00 mGy, 0.46 ± 0.00 mGy, and 0.42 ± 0.02 mGy, respectively, for the abdomen (AP), chest (AP), pelvis (AP), and nasopharynx (LAT). The range of organ doses were 0.05–0.45 mGy, 0.01–0.44 mGy, 0.13–1.05 mGy, and 0.084–0.99 mGy for the abdomen, chest, pelvis, and nasopharynx examination, respectively. Effective doses (ED) were 0.088 ± 0.021 mSv, 0.011 ± 0.004 mSv, 0.058 ± 0.007 mSv, and 0.044 ± 0.024 mSv for the abdomen, chest, pelvis, and nasopharynx examination, respectively.
The likelihood of cancer, as determined by the ICRP health risk model with a rate of 500 cases per 10 000 person-Sv (5% per sievert), estimated that a 0.015 case of health risk (0.3 person-Sv × 5% per sievert) may in the future be attributable to four X-ray pediatric procedures conducted in 2022.
The ESD, ED, and organ dose values are deemed acceptable compared to those reported in the literature. Although the risk of incidence and mortality from cancer during life is minimal, it should not be ignored.
期刊介绍:
Radiation Physics and Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal that provides a medium for publication of substantial and original papers, reviews, and short communications which focus on research and developments involving ionizing radiation in radiation physics, radiation chemistry and radiation processing.
The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. This could include papers that are very similar to previous publications, only with changed target substrates, employed materials, analyzed sites and experimental methods, report results without presenting new insights and/or hypothesis testing, or do not focus on the radiation effects.