不同排水条件下横向挤压应力路径下沙子的不稳定性

IF 3.3 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Antonio Souza , Ana Claudia Telles , David Reid , Andy Fourie , Marcio Almeida
{"title":"不同排水条件下横向挤压应力路径下沙子的不稳定性","authors":"Antonio Souza ,&nbsp;Ana Claudia Telles ,&nbsp;David Reid ,&nbsp;Andy Fourie ,&nbsp;Marcio Almeida","doi":"10.1016/j.sandf.2024.101529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A series of lateral extrusion (LE) tests were carried out on silica fine sand using the triaxial device to study the initiation of instability under various drainage conditions on this stress path. All specimens were reconstituted using the moist tamping technique, having achieved state parameter (ψ<sub>0</sub>) values between −0.020 and +0.086 after anisotropic consolidation. The LE stress path consists in a decrease of mean effective stress and increase of the deviator stress at a constant rate, maintaining the vertical stress constant. The LE tests were performed either with the drainage valves open or with undrained increments followed by drainage. Different magnitudes of undrained increments were tested. For the same initial state parameter, the results indicated that the instability stress ratio (<span><math><mrow><mi>η</mi></mrow></math></span><em><sub>IL</sub></em>) decreases as drainage conditions changes from drained to undrained/drained increments. As the magnitude of the undrained increment increases, <span><math><mrow><mi>η</mi></mrow></math></span><em><sub>IL</sub></em> decreases. Further, consistent with previous studies, the test data shows that the static liquefaction can be triggered in tests where the drainage valves are open, generating high values of excess of pore pressure only after the onset of instability. The results were also compared to results from CSD and CAU tests.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21857,"journal":{"name":"Soils and Foundations","volume":"64 6","pages":"Article 101529"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Instability of sand under a lateral extrusion stress path with different drainage conditions\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Souza ,&nbsp;Ana Claudia Telles ,&nbsp;David Reid ,&nbsp;Andy Fourie ,&nbsp;Marcio Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sandf.2024.101529\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A series of lateral extrusion (LE) tests were carried out on silica fine sand using the triaxial device to study the initiation of instability under various drainage conditions on this stress path. All specimens were reconstituted using the moist tamping technique, having achieved state parameter (ψ<sub>0</sub>) values between −0.020 and +0.086 after anisotropic consolidation. The LE stress path consists in a decrease of mean effective stress and increase of the deviator stress at a constant rate, maintaining the vertical stress constant. The LE tests were performed either with the drainage valves open or with undrained increments followed by drainage. Different magnitudes of undrained increments were tested. For the same initial state parameter, the results indicated that the instability stress ratio (<span><math><mrow><mi>η</mi></mrow></math></span><em><sub>IL</sub></em>) decreases as drainage conditions changes from drained to undrained/drained increments. As the magnitude of the undrained increment increases, <span><math><mrow><mi>η</mi></mrow></math></span><em><sub>IL</sub></em> decreases. Further, consistent with previous studies, the test data shows that the static liquefaction can be triggered in tests where the drainage valves are open, generating high values of excess of pore pressure only after the onset of instability. The results were also compared to results from CSD and CAU tests.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soils and Foundations\",\"volume\":\"64 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 101529\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soils and Foundations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080624001070\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soils and Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080624001070","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用三轴装置对硅质细砂进行了一系列横向挤压(LE)试验,以研究该应力路径上各种排水条件下失稳的起因。所有试样均采用潮湿捣实技术进行固结,各向异性固结后的状态参数(ψ0)值介于-0.020和+0.086之间。LE 应力路径包括平均有效应力的下降和偏差应力的匀速增加,同时保持垂直应力不变。LE 试验要么在排水阀打开的情况下进行,要么在排水后进行排水增量。测试了不同幅度的排水增量。对于相同的初始状态参数,结果表明,随着排水条件从排水到排水/排水增量的变化,不稳定应力比(ηIL)也随之降低。随着排水增量的增大,ηIL 也随之减小。此外,与之前的研究一致,试验数据显示,在排水阀打开的试验中,静态液化可能会被触发,只有在不稳定性开始后才会产生较高的过剩孔隙压力值。试验结果还与 CSD 和 CAU 试验结果进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Instability of sand under a lateral extrusion stress path with different drainage conditions
A series of lateral extrusion (LE) tests were carried out on silica fine sand using the triaxial device to study the initiation of instability under various drainage conditions on this stress path. All specimens were reconstituted using the moist tamping technique, having achieved state parameter (ψ0) values between −0.020 and +0.086 after anisotropic consolidation. The LE stress path consists in a decrease of mean effective stress and increase of the deviator stress at a constant rate, maintaining the vertical stress constant. The LE tests were performed either with the drainage valves open or with undrained increments followed by drainage. Different magnitudes of undrained increments were tested. For the same initial state parameter, the results indicated that the instability stress ratio (ηIL) decreases as drainage conditions changes from drained to undrained/drained increments. As the magnitude of the undrained increment increases, ηIL decreases. Further, consistent with previous studies, the test data shows that the static liquefaction can be triggered in tests where the drainage valves are open, generating high values of excess of pore pressure only after the onset of instability. The results were also compared to results from CSD and CAU tests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soils and Foundations
Soils and Foundations 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soils and Foundations is one of the leading journals in the field of soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. It is the official journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society (JGS)., The journal publishes a variety of original research paper, technical reports, technical notes, as well as the state-of-the-art reports upon invitation by the Editor, in the fields of soil and rock mechanics, geotechnical engineering, and environmental geotechnics. Since the publication of Volume 1, No.1 issue in June 1960, Soils and Foundations will celebrate the 60th anniversary in the year of 2020. Soils and Foundations welcomes theoretical as well as practical work associated with the aforementioned field(s). Case studies that describe the original and interdisciplinary work applicable to geotechnical engineering are particularly encouraged. Discussions to each of the published articles are also welcomed in order to provide an avenue in which opinions of peers may be fed back or exchanged. In providing latest expertise on a specific topic, one issue out of six per year on average was allocated to include selected papers from the International Symposia which were held in Japan as well as overseas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信