以可持续农业为背景,基于气候变化和土地利用调控政策的多种情景下的水土流失预测

IF 5.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Nian Li , Hongying Zhao , Zhibang Luo , Tianwei Wang , Jiawei Yang , Lu Li , Shuxin Que
{"title":"以可持续农业为背景,基于气候变化和土地利用调控政策的多种情景下的水土流失预测","authors":"Nian Li ,&nbsp;Hongying Zhao ,&nbsp;Zhibang Luo ,&nbsp;Tianwei Wang ,&nbsp;Jiawei Yang ,&nbsp;Lu Li ,&nbsp;Shuxin Que","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2024.108525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It remains a great challenge to develop feasible land use regulation strategies to control soil erosion under environmental constraints and agricultural demands. This study aims to explore the future outcomes of soil erosion under different land use regulation strategies and the impacts of climate change, while trying to incorporate regional differences in agricultural system development into these strategies. Based on historical data from 2000 to 2020 in 69 cities in South China, this study revealed the reciprocal cross-regulation patterns between soil and water conservation (SWC) and agricultural system development (ASD), highlighting the dynamic and evolving nature of their bidirectional interaction. Taking this historical experience into account, we designed an explorative scenario called discriminatory regulation with regional characteristics (DRC). This scenario assigned different sustainable regulation priorities to regions at different stages of agricultural system development based on the strength of the interaction between SWC and ASD. We also designed two reference scenarios: business as usual (BAU) and ecological and economic balance (EEB), to compare with the exploratory DRC scenario. The DRC scenario involved no additional interventions and continued the land use change trends of the past five years, while the EEB scenario implements uniform sustainable land use regulation across all regions. Ultimately, we used the CSLE model to project soil erosion outcomes under three scenarios and discussed the influencing factors. The SSP2-RCP4.5 scenario from the CMIP6 archive was chosen to provide the climate change background for the soil erosion predictions. The results of the BAU scenario show that the soil erosion modulus is predicted to be 975.75 t·km<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup> by the year 2050, exhibiting a significant increase relative to the average value of 729.03 t·km<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup> over the period 2000–2020. By 2050, climate change is projected to increase rainfall erosivity by 46.80 %, indicating that climate change will be the major driver of increased soil erosion in the future. In the EEB scenario, soil erosion will be reduced by 11.59 % compared to the BAU scenario when sustainable management is applied region-wide without discrimination. In the DRC scenario, soil erosion will be reduced by 15.68 % compared to the BAU scenario via promoting ecological restoration and encouraging conservation agriculture practices. Comparison of the three scenarios establishes that the DRC scenario is a meaningful attempt to integrate regional disparities in agricultural system development into land use regulation strategies. This study provides valuable references for policy makers to develop a holistic approach to soil resource management and coordinated regional development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"247 ","pages":"Article 108525"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil erosion prediction in multiple scenarios based on climate change and land use regulation policies in context of sustainable agriculture\",\"authors\":\"Nian Li ,&nbsp;Hongying Zhao ,&nbsp;Zhibang Luo ,&nbsp;Tianwei Wang ,&nbsp;Jiawei Yang ,&nbsp;Lu Li ,&nbsp;Shuxin Que\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.catena.2024.108525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>It remains a great challenge to develop feasible land use regulation strategies to control soil erosion under environmental constraints and agricultural demands. This study aims to explore the future outcomes of soil erosion under different land use regulation strategies and the impacts of climate change, while trying to incorporate regional differences in agricultural system development into these strategies. Based on historical data from 2000 to 2020 in 69 cities in South China, this study revealed the reciprocal cross-regulation patterns between soil and water conservation (SWC) and agricultural system development (ASD), highlighting the dynamic and evolving nature of their bidirectional interaction. Taking this historical experience into account, we designed an explorative scenario called discriminatory regulation with regional characteristics (DRC). This scenario assigned different sustainable regulation priorities to regions at different stages of agricultural system development based on the strength of the interaction between SWC and ASD. We also designed two reference scenarios: business as usual (BAU) and ecological and economic balance (EEB), to compare with the exploratory DRC scenario. The DRC scenario involved no additional interventions and continued the land use change trends of the past five years, while the EEB scenario implements uniform sustainable land use regulation across all regions. Ultimately, we used the CSLE model to project soil erosion outcomes under three scenarios and discussed the influencing factors. The SSP2-RCP4.5 scenario from the CMIP6 archive was chosen to provide the climate change background for the soil erosion predictions. The results of the BAU scenario show that the soil erosion modulus is predicted to be 975.75 t·km<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup> by the year 2050, exhibiting a significant increase relative to the average value of 729.03 t·km<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup> over the period 2000–2020. By 2050, climate change is projected to increase rainfall erosivity by 46.80 %, indicating that climate change will be the major driver of increased soil erosion in the future. In the EEB scenario, soil erosion will be reduced by 11.59 % compared to the BAU scenario when sustainable management is applied region-wide without discrimination. In the DRC scenario, soil erosion will be reduced by 15.68 % compared to the BAU scenario via promoting ecological restoration and encouraging conservation agriculture practices. Comparison of the three scenarios establishes that the DRC scenario is a meaningful attempt to integrate regional disparities in agricultural system development into land use regulation strategies. This study provides valuable references for policy makers to develop a holistic approach to soil resource management and coordinated regional development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catena\",\"volume\":\"247 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108525\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catena\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816224007227\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816224007227","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在环境约束和农业需求下,如何制定可行的土地利用调节战略来控制水土流失仍然是一项巨大的挑战。本研究旨在探讨不同土地利用调控策略下水土流失的未来结果以及气候变化的影响,同时尝试将农业系统发展的地区差异纳入这些策略中。基于华南地区 69 个城市 2000 年至 2020 年的历史数据,本研究揭示了水土保持与农业系统发展之间相互交叉的调节模式,突出了两者双向互动的动态和演变性质。考虑到这一历史经验,我们设计了一种探索性情景,称为具有区域特色的歧视性调控(DRC)。该情景根据小农作物委员会和农业可持续发展之间互动的强度,为处于农业系统发展不同阶段的地区分配不同的可持续监管优先级。我们还设计了两个参考情景:"一切照旧"(BAU)和生态与经济平衡(EEB),以便与探索性的 DRC 情景进行比较。DRC 情景不涉及额外的干预措施,继续保持过去五年的土地利用变化趋势,而 EEB 情景则在所有地区实施统一的可持续土地利用监管。最后,我们使用 CSLE 模型预测了三种情景下的土壤侵蚀结果,并讨论了影响因素。我们选择 CMIP6 档案中的 SSP2-RCP4.5 情景作为土壤侵蚀预测的气候变化背景。一切照旧 "情景的结果显示,到 2050 年,土壤侵蚀模数预计为 975.75 吨-公里-2-a-1,与 2000-2020 年期间的平均值 729.03 吨-公里-2-a-1 相比有显著增加。预计到 2050 年,气候变化将使降雨侵蚀率增加 46.80%,这表明气候变化将成为未来土壤侵蚀增加的主要驱动力。在 EEB 情景下,如果在整个地区无差别地实施可持续管理,土壤侵蚀将比 BAU 情景下减少 11.59%。在刚果民主共和国方案中,通过促进生态恢复和鼓励保护性农业实践,土壤侵蚀将比 "一切照旧 "方案减少 15.68%。对三种情景的比较表明,DRC 情景是将农业系统发展的地区差异纳入土地利用调控战略的一次有意义的尝试。这项研究为政策制定者提供了有价值的参考,以制定土壤资源管理和区域协调发展的整体方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Soil erosion prediction in multiple scenarios based on climate change and land use regulation policies in context of sustainable agriculture
It remains a great challenge to develop feasible land use regulation strategies to control soil erosion under environmental constraints and agricultural demands. This study aims to explore the future outcomes of soil erosion under different land use regulation strategies and the impacts of climate change, while trying to incorporate regional differences in agricultural system development into these strategies. Based on historical data from 2000 to 2020 in 69 cities in South China, this study revealed the reciprocal cross-regulation patterns between soil and water conservation (SWC) and agricultural system development (ASD), highlighting the dynamic and evolving nature of their bidirectional interaction. Taking this historical experience into account, we designed an explorative scenario called discriminatory regulation with regional characteristics (DRC). This scenario assigned different sustainable regulation priorities to regions at different stages of agricultural system development based on the strength of the interaction between SWC and ASD. We also designed two reference scenarios: business as usual (BAU) and ecological and economic balance (EEB), to compare with the exploratory DRC scenario. The DRC scenario involved no additional interventions and continued the land use change trends of the past five years, while the EEB scenario implements uniform sustainable land use regulation across all regions. Ultimately, we used the CSLE model to project soil erosion outcomes under three scenarios and discussed the influencing factors. The SSP2-RCP4.5 scenario from the CMIP6 archive was chosen to provide the climate change background for the soil erosion predictions. The results of the BAU scenario show that the soil erosion modulus is predicted to be 975.75 t·km−2·a−1 by the year 2050, exhibiting a significant increase relative to the average value of 729.03 t·km−2·a−1 over the period 2000–2020. By 2050, climate change is projected to increase rainfall erosivity by 46.80 %, indicating that climate change will be the major driver of increased soil erosion in the future. In the EEB scenario, soil erosion will be reduced by 11.59 % compared to the BAU scenario when sustainable management is applied region-wide without discrimination. In the DRC scenario, soil erosion will be reduced by 15.68 % compared to the BAU scenario via promoting ecological restoration and encouraging conservation agriculture practices. Comparison of the three scenarios establishes that the DRC scenario is a meaningful attempt to integrate regional disparities in agricultural system development into land use regulation strategies. This study provides valuable references for policy makers to develop a holistic approach to soil resource management and coordinated regional development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信