优化氮肥管理增加表层土壤有机碳储量,维持整个土壤的无机碳储量以增加土壤碳储量--15 年的实地验证

IF 6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Xingbang Wang , Ling Zhang , Prakash Lakshmanan , Ji Chen , Wushuai Zhang , Xinping Chen
{"title":"优化氮肥管理增加表层土壤有机碳储量,维持整个土壤的无机碳储量以增加土壤碳储量--15 年的实地验证","authors":"Xingbang Wang ,&nbsp;Ling Zhang ,&nbsp;Prakash Lakshmanan ,&nbsp;Ji Chen ,&nbsp;Wushuai Zhang ,&nbsp;Xinping Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2024.109365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nitrogen application significantly impacts soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil inorganic carbon (SIC) stocks, both of which are crucial for soil carbon sequestration. However, the effects of nitrogen fertilizer on the dynamics of SOC and SIC stocks remain poorly understood. Over a 15-year wheat-maize rotation experiment conducted on calcareous alluvial soil in temperate continental monsoon climate, we quantitatively analyzed crop carbon return and dynamics of SOC and SIC stocks among soil layers. Compared to conventional nitrogen management (Con.N), optimal nitrogen management (Opt.N) increased crop carbon return by 130 kg C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. There was no significant difference in SOC stock between Opt.N and Con.N, despite Opt.N used 39.4 % less nitrogen input compared to Con.N. In the topsoil, Opt.N maintained SIC levels similar to those of the Control and significantly increased by 7.22 % compared to Con.N. The Con.N treatment reduced SIC stock by 10.1 % compared to the Control. Furthermore, Opt.N had no significant negative effect on SIC stock in subsoil, thereby maintaining the whole SIC stock. After 15 years, Opt.N achieved a soil carbon stock of 52.7 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup>, outperforming Con.N. SOC dominated the topsoil carbon stock, while SIC played a more crucial role in the subsoil. Overall, Opt.N outperformed Con.N in terms of the combined SOC and SIC stocks. Our findings suggest that Opt.N can enhance soil carbon stock with lower resource consumption, thereby contributing to global warming mitigation and promoting sustainable low-carbon agriculture.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"379 ","pages":"Article 109365"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal nitrogen management increased topsoil organic carbon stock and maintained whole soil inorganic carbon stock to increase soil carbon stock—A 15-year field evidence\",\"authors\":\"Xingbang Wang ,&nbsp;Ling Zhang ,&nbsp;Prakash Lakshmanan ,&nbsp;Ji Chen ,&nbsp;Wushuai Zhang ,&nbsp;Xinping Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agee.2024.109365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Nitrogen application significantly impacts soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil inorganic carbon (SIC) stocks, both of which are crucial for soil carbon sequestration. However, the effects of nitrogen fertilizer on the dynamics of SOC and SIC stocks remain poorly understood. Over a 15-year wheat-maize rotation experiment conducted on calcareous alluvial soil in temperate continental monsoon climate, we quantitatively analyzed crop carbon return and dynamics of SOC and SIC stocks among soil layers. Compared to conventional nitrogen management (Con.N), optimal nitrogen management (Opt.N) increased crop carbon return by 130 kg C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. There was no significant difference in SOC stock between Opt.N and Con.N, despite Opt.N used 39.4 % less nitrogen input compared to Con.N. In the topsoil, Opt.N maintained SIC levels similar to those of the Control and significantly increased by 7.22 % compared to Con.N. The Con.N treatment reduced SIC stock by 10.1 % compared to the Control. Furthermore, Opt.N had no significant negative effect on SIC stock in subsoil, thereby maintaining the whole SIC stock. After 15 years, Opt.N achieved a soil carbon stock of 52.7 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup>, outperforming Con.N. SOC dominated the topsoil carbon stock, while SIC played a more crucial role in the subsoil. Overall, Opt.N outperformed Con.N in terms of the combined SOC and SIC stocks. Our findings suggest that Opt.N can enhance soil carbon stock with lower resource consumption, thereby contributing to global warming mitigation and promoting sustainable low-carbon agriculture.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment\",\"volume\":\"379 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109365\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880924004833\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880924004833","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

施氮会对土壤有机碳(SOC)和土壤无机碳(SIC)储量产生重大影响,而这两种碳对土壤固碳至关重要。然而,人们对氮肥对土壤有机碳和土壤无机碳储量动态的影响仍然知之甚少。我们在温带大陆性季风气候的钙质冲积土壤上进行了为期 15 年的小麦-玉米轮作试验,定量分析了作物碳回报以及土壤层间 SOC 和 SIC 储量的动态变化。与常规氮肥管理(Con.N)相比,优化氮肥管理(Opt.N)使作物碳回报增加了 130 kg C ha-1 yr-1。在表层土壤中,Opt.N 保持了与对照相似的 SIC 水平,与 Con.N 相比则显著增加了 7.22%;与对照相比,Con.N 处理减少了 10.1%的 SIC 储量。此外,Opt.N 对底土中的 SIC 储量没有明显的负面影响,从而保持了整个 SIC 储量。15 年后,Opt.N 的土壤碳储量达到 52.7 Mg C ha-1,优于 Con.N。SOC 在表层土壤碳储量中占主导地位,而 SIC 在底层土壤中起着更重要的作用。总体而言,就 SOC 和 SIC 的综合碳储量而言,Opt.N 优于 Con.N。我们的研究结果表明,Opt.N 能以较低的资源消耗提高土壤碳储量,从而为减缓全球变暖和促进可持续低碳农业做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal nitrogen management increased topsoil organic carbon stock and maintained whole soil inorganic carbon stock to increase soil carbon stock—A 15-year field evidence
Nitrogen application significantly impacts soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil inorganic carbon (SIC) stocks, both of which are crucial for soil carbon sequestration. However, the effects of nitrogen fertilizer on the dynamics of SOC and SIC stocks remain poorly understood. Over a 15-year wheat-maize rotation experiment conducted on calcareous alluvial soil in temperate continental monsoon climate, we quantitatively analyzed crop carbon return and dynamics of SOC and SIC stocks among soil layers. Compared to conventional nitrogen management (Con.N), optimal nitrogen management (Opt.N) increased crop carbon return by 130 kg C ha−1 yr−1. There was no significant difference in SOC stock between Opt.N and Con.N, despite Opt.N used 39.4 % less nitrogen input compared to Con.N. In the topsoil, Opt.N maintained SIC levels similar to those of the Control and significantly increased by 7.22 % compared to Con.N. The Con.N treatment reduced SIC stock by 10.1 % compared to the Control. Furthermore, Opt.N had no significant negative effect on SIC stock in subsoil, thereby maintaining the whole SIC stock. After 15 years, Opt.N achieved a soil carbon stock of 52.7 Mg C ha−1, outperforming Con.N. SOC dominated the topsoil carbon stock, while SIC played a more crucial role in the subsoil. Overall, Opt.N outperformed Con.N in terms of the combined SOC and SIC stocks. Our findings suggest that Opt.N can enhance soil carbon stock with lower resource consumption, thereby contributing to global warming mitigation and promoting sustainable low-carbon agriculture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信