测量不完整性,而不仅仅是正确体验:对强迫症和焦虑症样本中两种常用问卷的心理计量学评估

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Christina Puccinelli , Karen Rowa , Laura J. Summerfeldt , Randi E. McCabe
{"title":"测量不完整性,而不仅仅是正确体验:对强迫症和焦虑症样本中两种常用问卷的心理计量学评估","authors":"Christina Puccinelli ,&nbsp;Karen Rowa ,&nbsp;Laura J. Summerfeldt ,&nbsp;Randi E. McCabe","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Extending previous research, this study examined the psychometric properties of two commonly used self-report measures of incompleteness (INC) and not-just-right experiences (NJREs), the Obsessive-Compulsive Trait Core Dimensions Questionnaire (OC-TCDQ; Summerfeldt et al., 2014) and the Not Just Right Experiences Questionnaire - Revised (NJRE-QR; Coles et al., 2003) in large samples of individuals with OCD and anxiety disorders. Factor analyses indicated adequate support for a two-factor solution for the OC-TCDQ and a one-factor solution for the NJRE-QR. Both measures demonstrated excellent internal consistency and good-to-excellent test-retest reliability. We found good convergent validity between the measures of interest and with an OCD symptom severity measure. Discriminant validity was evidenced by a significantly stronger correlation between INC and NJRE severity than the relatively modest correlations with theoretically distinct constructs (i.e., harm avoidance and general distress). Individuals with OCD had a similar number of NJREs as individuals with anxiety disorders but reported significantly greater NJRE distress and levels of INC. Finally, both measures were sensitive to change across group cognitive-behavioural therapy for OCD. These findings provide support for the reliability and validity of the OC-TCDQ and NJRE-QR to measure INC (trait) and NJRE (state) constructs that assist in understanding the phenomenology of OCD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100916"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring incompleteness and not just right experiences: A psychometric evaluation of two commonly used questionnaires in OCD and anxiety disorders samples\",\"authors\":\"Christina Puccinelli ,&nbsp;Karen Rowa ,&nbsp;Laura J. Summerfeldt ,&nbsp;Randi E. McCabe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Extending previous research, this study examined the psychometric properties of two commonly used self-report measures of incompleteness (INC) and not-just-right experiences (NJREs), the Obsessive-Compulsive Trait Core Dimensions Questionnaire (OC-TCDQ; Summerfeldt et al., 2014) and the Not Just Right Experiences Questionnaire - Revised (NJRE-QR; Coles et al., 2003) in large samples of individuals with OCD and anxiety disorders. Factor analyses indicated adequate support for a two-factor solution for the OC-TCDQ and a one-factor solution for the NJRE-QR. Both measures demonstrated excellent internal consistency and good-to-excellent test-retest reliability. We found good convergent validity between the measures of interest and with an OCD symptom severity measure. Discriminant validity was evidenced by a significantly stronger correlation between INC and NJRE severity than the relatively modest correlations with theoretically distinct constructs (i.e., harm avoidance and general distress). Individuals with OCD had a similar number of NJREs as individuals with anxiety disorders but reported significantly greater NJRE distress and levels of INC. Finally, both measures were sensitive to change across group cognitive-behavioural therapy for OCD. These findings provide support for the reliability and validity of the OC-TCDQ and NJRE-QR to measure INC (trait) and NJRE (state) constructs that assist in understanding the phenomenology of OCD.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders\",\"volume\":\"43 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100916\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364924000605\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364924000605","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究扩展了以往的研究,在强迫症和焦虑症患者的大样本中检验了两种常用的不完整性(INC)和不正确经历(NJREs)自我报告测量方法的心理测量特性,即强迫症特质核心维度问卷(OC-TCDQ;Summerfeldt等人,2014年)和不正确经历问卷-修订版(NJRE-QR;Coles等人,2003年)。因素分析表明,OC-TCDQ 的双因素解决方案和 NJRE-QR 的单因素解决方案得到了充分支持。这两项测验都表现出了极佳的内部一致性和良好到极佳的测试-再测试可靠性。我们发现相关测量之间以及与强迫症症状严重程度测量之间具有良好的收敛效度。INC 与 NJRE 严重程度之间的相关性明显强于与理论上不同的构念(即伤害回避和一般困扰)之间相对较小的相关性,这证明了区分效度。强迫症患者的 NJRE 数量与焦虑症患者相似,但他们报告的 NJRE 痛苦和 INC 水平明显更高。最后,这两种测量方法对强迫症认知行为治疗小组的变化都很敏感。这些研究结果为 OC-TCDQ 和 NJRE-QR 测量 INC(特质)和 NJRE(状态)建构的可靠性和有效性提供了支持,有助于理解强迫症的现象学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring incompleteness and not just right experiences: A psychometric evaluation of two commonly used questionnaires in OCD and anxiety disorders samples
Extending previous research, this study examined the psychometric properties of two commonly used self-report measures of incompleteness (INC) and not-just-right experiences (NJREs), the Obsessive-Compulsive Trait Core Dimensions Questionnaire (OC-TCDQ; Summerfeldt et al., 2014) and the Not Just Right Experiences Questionnaire - Revised (NJRE-QR; Coles et al., 2003) in large samples of individuals with OCD and anxiety disorders. Factor analyses indicated adequate support for a two-factor solution for the OC-TCDQ and a one-factor solution for the NJRE-QR. Both measures demonstrated excellent internal consistency and good-to-excellent test-retest reliability. We found good convergent validity between the measures of interest and with an OCD symptom severity measure. Discriminant validity was evidenced by a significantly stronger correlation between INC and NJRE severity than the relatively modest correlations with theoretically distinct constructs (i.e., harm avoidance and general distress). Individuals with OCD had a similar number of NJREs as individuals with anxiety disorders but reported significantly greater NJRE distress and levels of INC. Finally, both measures were sensitive to change across group cognitive-behavioural therapy for OCD. These findings provide support for the reliability and validity of the OC-TCDQ and NJRE-QR to measure INC (trait) and NJRE (state) constructs that assist in understanding the phenomenology of OCD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
46
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders (JOCRD) is an international journal that publishes high quality research and clinically-oriented articles dealing with all aspects of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and related conditions (OC spectrum disorders; e.g., trichotillomania, hoarding, body dysmorphic disorder). The journal invites studies of clinical and non-clinical (i.e., student) samples of all age groups from the fields of psychiatry, psychology, neuroscience, and other medical and health sciences. The journal''s broad focus encompasses classification, assessment, psychological and psychiatric treatment, prevention, psychopathology, neurobiology and genetics. Clinical reports (descriptions of innovative treatment methods) and book reviews on all aspects of OCD-related disorders will be considered, as will theoretical and review articles that make valuable contributions. Suitable topics for manuscripts include: -The boundaries of OCD and relationships with OC spectrum disorders -Validation of assessments of obsessive-compulsive and related phenomena -OCD symptoms in diverse social and cultural contexts -Studies of neurobiological and genetic factors in OCD and related conditions -Experimental and descriptive psychopathology and epidemiological studies -Studies on relationships among cognitive and behavioral variables in OCD and related disorders -Interpersonal aspects of OCD and related disorders -Evaluation of psychological and psychiatric treatment and prevention programs, and predictors of outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信