Yang Zhang , Yufei Wang , Quan Z. Sheng , Lina Yao , Haihua Chen , Kai Wang , Adnan Mahmood , Wei Emma Zhang , Munazza Zaib , Subhash Sagar , Rongying Zhao
{"title":"深度学习与文献计量学的结合:引文函数分类调查","authors":"Yang Zhang , Yufei Wang , Quan Z. Sheng , Lina Yao , Haihua Chen , Kai Wang , Adnan Mahmood , Wei Emma Zhang , Munazza Zaib , Subhash Sagar , Rongying Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2024.101608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the advent and progression of Natural Language Processing (NLP) methodologies, the domain of automatic citation function classification has gained popularity and considerable research efforts have been contributed to this task. Automatic citation function classification has a joint computational linguistic and bibliometrics background. However, due to the different expertise in both fields, there is rarely a comprehensive and unified analysis of this task. We provide a detailed and nuanced examination analysis of the evolution of citation function classification task from the dimensions of citation function annotation schemes, widely employed benchmarks, and computational models. We first present the origins and the development of the citation function classification task. From the perspective of multi-disciplinary integration, we then discuss how bibliometrics and NLP can be better combined to contribute to the citation function classification task. Finally, based on the deficiencies that we have found in the task, we suggest some promising prospects in both bibliometrics and NLP to be investigated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Informetrics","volume":"19 1","pages":"Article 101608"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning meets bibliometrics: A survey of citation function classification\",\"authors\":\"Yang Zhang , Yufei Wang , Quan Z. Sheng , Lina Yao , Haihua Chen , Kai Wang , Adnan Mahmood , Wei Emma Zhang , Munazza Zaib , Subhash Sagar , Rongying Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joi.2024.101608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>With the advent and progression of Natural Language Processing (NLP) methodologies, the domain of automatic citation function classification has gained popularity and considerable research efforts have been contributed to this task. Automatic citation function classification has a joint computational linguistic and bibliometrics background. However, due to the different expertise in both fields, there is rarely a comprehensive and unified analysis of this task. We provide a detailed and nuanced examination analysis of the evolution of citation function classification task from the dimensions of citation function annotation schemes, widely employed benchmarks, and computational models. We first present the origins and the development of the citation function classification task. From the perspective of multi-disciplinary integration, we then discuss how bibliometrics and NLP can be better combined to contribute to the citation function classification task. Finally, based on the deficiencies that we have found in the task, we suggest some promising prospects in both bibliometrics and NLP to be investigated.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Informetrics\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 101608\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Informetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157724001202\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Informetrics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157724001202","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Deep learning meets bibliometrics: A survey of citation function classification
With the advent and progression of Natural Language Processing (NLP) methodologies, the domain of automatic citation function classification has gained popularity and considerable research efforts have been contributed to this task. Automatic citation function classification has a joint computational linguistic and bibliometrics background. However, due to the different expertise in both fields, there is rarely a comprehensive and unified analysis of this task. We provide a detailed and nuanced examination analysis of the evolution of citation function classification task from the dimensions of citation function annotation schemes, widely employed benchmarks, and computational models. We first present the origins and the development of the citation function classification task. From the perspective of multi-disciplinary integration, we then discuss how bibliometrics and NLP can be better combined to contribute to the citation function classification task. Finally, based on the deficiencies that we have found in the task, we suggest some promising prospects in both bibliometrics and NLP to be investigated.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Informetrics (JOI) publishes rigorous high-quality research on quantitative aspects of information science. The main focus of the journal is on topics in bibliometrics, scientometrics, webometrics, patentometrics, altmetrics and research evaluation. Contributions studying informetric problems using methods from other quantitative fields, such as mathematics, statistics, computer science, economics and econometrics, and network science, are especially encouraged. JOI publishes both theoretical and empirical work. In general, case studies, for instance a bibliometric analysis focusing on a specific research field or a specific country, are not considered suitable for publication in JOI, unless they contain innovative methodological elements.