蚯蚓生态类别分布建模和空间预测揭示其生境和环境偏好

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Gabriel Salako , Andrey Zaitsev , Bibiana Betancur-Corredor , David J. Russell
{"title":"蚯蚓生态类别分布建模和空间预测揭示其生境和环境偏好","authors":"Gabriel Salako ,&nbsp;Andrey Zaitsev ,&nbsp;Bibiana Betancur-Corredor ,&nbsp;David J. Russell","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Earthworms are one of the important soil animals and have been generally described as soil engineers. Knowledge on environmental conditions driving the distribution and population of this soil animal and the habitat which support these conditions especially at the ecological level is required to understand their responses to these environmental conditions at different habitats so as to guide its usage as bio indicator of soil quality and health. In this study we use RandomForest (RF), a machine learning algorithm to model species distribution, density/abundance based (SDM/SAM) and predict the biodiversity distribution (richness and density, ind.m<sup>−2</sup>) of three basic earthworms ecological categories: epigeic, endogeic and anecic (including the epi-anecic subcategory) across soil and climate variables at multiple habitat type/land uses in Germany. Our study shows there are spatial/ geographic variation in the distribution of the species richness and density among the three earthworms’ ecological categories. Also their environmental and habitat preferences are equally different, while epigeic species are predicted to be climate driven mostly in forests, endogeics are predicted to be the most diverse (in richness and density), but are mostly driven by soil textural contents (clay and silt) and found primarily in arable and grassland. Vineyard and crop flood plain are predicted to be suitable and the preferred habitat for anecics/epi-anecics. This study also identify optimum environmental gradient at which the species density is at the peak in each of the earthworm’s ecological category which would not only provide guide on soil biodiversity monitoring but also the soil health status.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 112832"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling and spatial prediction of earthworms ecological-categories distribution reveal their habitat and environmental preferences\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Salako ,&nbsp;Andrey Zaitsev ,&nbsp;Bibiana Betancur-Corredor ,&nbsp;David J. Russell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Earthworms are one of the important soil animals and have been generally described as soil engineers. Knowledge on environmental conditions driving the distribution and population of this soil animal and the habitat which support these conditions especially at the ecological level is required to understand their responses to these environmental conditions at different habitats so as to guide its usage as bio indicator of soil quality and health. In this study we use RandomForest (RF), a machine learning algorithm to model species distribution, density/abundance based (SDM/SAM) and predict the biodiversity distribution (richness and density, ind.m<sup>−2</sup>) of three basic earthworms ecological categories: epigeic, endogeic and anecic (including the epi-anecic subcategory) across soil and climate variables at multiple habitat type/land uses in Germany. Our study shows there are spatial/ geographic variation in the distribution of the species richness and density among the three earthworms’ ecological categories. Also their environmental and habitat preferences are equally different, while epigeic species are predicted to be climate driven mostly in forests, endogeics are predicted to be the most diverse (in richness and density), but are mostly driven by soil textural contents (clay and silt) and found primarily in arable and grassland. Vineyard and crop flood plain are predicted to be suitable and the preferred habitat for anecics/epi-anecics. This study also identify optimum environmental gradient at which the species density is at the peak in each of the earthworm’s ecological category which would not only provide guide on soil biodiversity monitoring but also the soil health status.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"169 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112832\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24012895\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24012895","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蚯蚓是重要的土壤动物之一,通常被称为土壤工程师。为了了解蚯蚓在不同栖息地对这些环境条件的反应,我们需要了解驱动这种土壤动物分布和数量的环境条件以及支持这些条件的栖息地,尤其是生态层面的条件,从而指导将其用作土壤质量和健康的生物指标。在这项研究中,我们使用机器学习算法 RandomForest(RF)来模拟物种分布、密度/丰度(SDM/SAM),并预测德国多种栖息地类型/土地利用中三种基本蚯蚓生态类别(epigeic、endogeic 和 anecic,包括 epi-anecic 子类别)在土壤和气候变量中的生物多样性分布(丰富度和密度,ind.m-2)。我们的研究表明,三种蚯蚓生态类别的物种丰富度和密度分布存在空间/地理差异。此外,它们对环境和栖息地的偏好也同样不同,表生蚯蚓主要分布在森林中,受气候影响较大;内生性蚯蚓的种类(丰富度和密度)最多,但主要受土壤质地(粘土和淤泥)的影响,主要分布在耕地和草地中。据预测,葡萄园和农田冲积平原将是茴芹/茴芹的适宜栖息地和首选栖息地。这项研究还确定了蚯蚓各生态类别中物种密度最高的最佳环境梯度,这不仅能为土壤生物多样性监测提供指导,还能反映土壤健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modelling and spatial prediction of earthworms ecological-categories distribution reveal their habitat and environmental preferences
Earthworms are one of the important soil animals and have been generally described as soil engineers. Knowledge on environmental conditions driving the distribution and population of this soil animal and the habitat which support these conditions especially at the ecological level is required to understand their responses to these environmental conditions at different habitats so as to guide its usage as bio indicator of soil quality and health. In this study we use RandomForest (RF), a machine learning algorithm to model species distribution, density/abundance based (SDM/SAM) and predict the biodiversity distribution (richness and density, ind.m−2) of three basic earthworms ecological categories: epigeic, endogeic and anecic (including the epi-anecic subcategory) across soil and climate variables at multiple habitat type/land uses in Germany. Our study shows there are spatial/ geographic variation in the distribution of the species richness and density among the three earthworms’ ecological categories. Also their environmental and habitat preferences are equally different, while epigeic species are predicted to be climate driven mostly in forests, endogeics are predicted to be the most diverse (in richness and density), but are mostly driven by soil textural contents (clay and silt) and found primarily in arable and grassland. Vineyard and crop flood plain are predicted to be suitable and the preferred habitat for anecics/epi-anecics. This study also identify optimum environmental gradient at which the species density is at the peak in each of the earthworm’s ecological category which would not only provide guide on soil biodiversity monitoring but also the soil health status.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信