Abdullah Alamoodi , Salem Garfan , Muhammet Deveci , O.S. Albahri , A.S. Albahri , Salman Yussof , Raad Z. Homod , Iman Mohamad Sharaf , Sarbast Moslem
{"title":"基于双曲模糊加权零不一致与组合距离评估相结合的农业 4.0 决策支持系统评估","authors":"Abdullah Alamoodi , Salem Garfan , Muhammet Deveci , O.S. Albahri , A.S. Albahri , Salman Yussof , Raad Z. Homod , Iman Mohamad Sharaf , Sarbast Moslem","doi":"10.1016/j.compag.2024.109618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agriculture 4.0 plays a crucial role in shaping sustainable cities and societies by revolutionizing urban food systems. By incorporating advanced technologies like precision farming, vertical gardening, and data analytics, Agriculture 4.0 improves local food production, reduces food transportation, and optimizes resource utilization. This paper introduces an innovative approach using Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) to assess Agriculture 4.0 Decision Support Systems (ADSS), contributing significantly to the selection of optimal systems that can drive sustainability in smart agriculture. The novelty of this research lies in developing a comprehensive evaluation framework that extends the hyperbolic fuzzy-weighted zero-inconsistency method for criteria weighting, combined with the combinative distance-based assessment method for benchmarking ADSS. The assessment matrix evaluates 13 ADSS across eight key criteria, including “<em>accessibility</em>,” “<em>re-planning</em>,” “<em>expert knowledge</em>,” “<em>interoperability</em>,” “<em>scalability</em>,” “<em>uncertainty and dynamic factors</em>,” “<em>prediction and forecast</em>,” and “<em>historical data analysis</em>”. Results from the hyperbolic fuzzy-weighted zero-inconsistency approach highlight “<em>re-planning</em>” (<em>0.143</em>) and “<em>prediction and forecast</em>” (<em>0.140</em>) as the most significant criteria, while “<em>expert knowledge</em>” ranked lowest (<em>0.113</em>). In the combinative distance-based assessment, the system labelled “OCCASION” achieved the highest score (<em>3.843</em>), positioning it as the most favourable ADSS, whereas the “MOLP-based beef supply chain” system scored lowest <em>(−3.519</em>). Sensitivity analysis, conducted using varying sets of weights, confirms the robustness and reliability of the proposed approach. This research provides a powerful decision-making tool that can guide stakeholders in selecting the best ADSS, ultimately promoting sustainability and resource optimization in Agriculture 4.0. The findings have important implications for farmers, agribusiness, and smart agriculture, demonstrating the potential of the methodology to enhance decision-making processes in a critical sector.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50627,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","volume":"227 ","pages":"Article 109618"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating agriculture 4.0 decision support systems based on hyperbolic fuzzy-weighted zero-inconsistency combined with combinative distance-based assessment\",\"authors\":\"Abdullah Alamoodi , Salem Garfan , Muhammet Deveci , O.S. Albahri , A.S. Albahri , Salman Yussof , Raad Z. Homod , Iman Mohamad Sharaf , Sarbast Moslem\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compag.2024.109618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Agriculture 4.0 plays a crucial role in shaping sustainable cities and societies by revolutionizing urban food systems. By incorporating advanced technologies like precision farming, vertical gardening, and data analytics, Agriculture 4.0 improves local food production, reduces food transportation, and optimizes resource utilization. This paper introduces an innovative approach using Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) to assess Agriculture 4.0 Decision Support Systems (ADSS), contributing significantly to the selection of optimal systems that can drive sustainability in smart agriculture. The novelty of this research lies in developing a comprehensive evaluation framework that extends the hyperbolic fuzzy-weighted zero-inconsistency method for criteria weighting, combined with the combinative distance-based assessment method for benchmarking ADSS. The assessment matrix evaluates 13 ADSS across eight key criteria, including “<em>accessibility</em>,” “<em>re-planning</em>,” “<em>expert knowledge</em>,” “<em>interoperability</em>,” “<em>scalability</em>,” “<em>uncertainty and dynamic factors</em>,” “<em>prediction and forecast</em>,” and “<em>historical data analysis</em>”. Results from the hyperbolic fuzzy-weighted zero-inconsistency approach highlight “<em>re-planning</em>” (<em>0.143</em>) and “<em>prediction and forecast</em>” (<em>0.140</em>) as the most significant criteria, while “<em>expert knowledge</em>” ranked lowest (<em>0.113</em>). In the combinative distance-based assessment, the system labelled “OCCASION” achieved the highest score (<em>3.843</em>), positioning it as the most favourable ADSS, whereas the “MOLP-based beef supply chain” system scored lowest <em>(−3.519</em>). Sensitivity analysis, conducted using varying sets of weights, confirms the robustness and reliability of the proposed approach. This research provides a powerful decision-making tool that can guide stakeholders in selecting the best ADSS, ultimately promoting sustainability and resource optimization in Agriculture 4.0. The findings have important implications for farmers, agribusiness, and smart agriculture, demonstrating the potential of the methodology to enhance decision-making processes in a critical sector.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"227 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109618\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169924010093\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169924010093","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating agriculture 4.0 decision support systems based on hyperbolic fuzzy-weighted zero-inconsistency combined with combinative distance-based assessment
Agriculture 4.0 plays a crucial role in shaping sustainable cities and societies by revolutionizing urban food systems. By incorporating advanced technologies like precision farming, vertical gardening, and data analytics, Agriculture 4.0 improves local food production, reduces food transportation, and optimizes resource utilization. This paper introduces an innovative approach using Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) to assess Agriculture 4.0 Decision Support Systems (ADSS), contributing significantly to the selection of optimal systems that can drive sustainability in smart agriculture. The novelty of this research lies in developing a comprehensive evaluation framework that extends the hyperbolic fuzzy-weighted zero-inconsistency method for criteria weighting, combined with the combinative distance-based assessment method for benchmarking ADSS. The assessment matrix evaluates 13 ADSS across eight key criteria, including “accessibility,” “re-planning,” “expert knowledge,” “interoperability,” “scalability,” “uncertainty and dynamic factors,” “prediction and forecast,” and “historical data analysis”. Results from the hyperbolic fuzzy-weighted zero-inconsistency approach highlight “re-planning” (0.143) and “prediction and forecast” (0.140) as the most significant criteria, while “expert knowledge” ranked lowest (0.113). In the combinative distance-based assessment, the system labelled “OCCASION” achieved the highest score (3.843), positioning it as the most favourable ADSS, whereas the “MOLP-based beef supply chain” system scored lowest (−3.519). Sensitivity analysis, conducted using varying sets of weights, confirms the robustness and reliability of the proposed approach. This research provides a powerful decision-making tool that can guide stakeholders in selecting the best ADSS, ultimately promoting sustainability and resource optimization in Agriculture 4.0. The findings have important implications for farmers, agribusiness, and smart agriculture, demonstrating the potential of the methodology to enhance decision-making processes in a critical sector.
期刊介绍:
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture provides international coverage of advancements in computer hardware, software, electronic instrumentation, and control systems applied to agricultural challenges. Encompassing agronomy, horticulture, forestry, aquaculture, and animal farming, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, and applications notes. It explores the use of computers and electronics in plant or animal agricultural production, covering topics like agricultural soils, water, pests, controlled environments, and waste. The scope extends to on-farm post-harvest operations and relevant technologies, including artificial intelligence, sensors, machine vision, robotics, networking, and simulation modeling. Its companion journal, Smart Agricultural Technology, continues the focus on smart applications in production agriculture.