Ria Pothoven , Judith A.M. Derks , Erik Arendsen , Dick A.W. Janssen
{"title":"用于无导管膀胱内治疗的微创注射器适配器的短期和长期临床效果","authors":"Ria Pothoven , Judith A.M. Derks , Erik Arendsen , Dick A.W. Janssen","doi":"10.1016/j.cont.2024.101723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction:</h3><div>Intravesical treatment is currently dependent on catheterization which can cause urethral discomfort and risk of urinary tract infections in selected patient groups such as interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS), overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) and recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTI). This study describes real-life clinical experience of a minimally invasive syringe adapter (Ialuadapter®) for catheter-free instillation of intravesical treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>A retrospective study from a single center was performed. Quantitative and qualitative data was obtained on the use of the syringe adapter (Ialuadapter®) in 61 patients with IC/BPS (n=48), rUTI (n=6) and mixed /other diagnoses (including OAB; n= 7) who were receiving intravesical therapy. The evaluation period was 6 months during 2018–2019. Reasons for trying the syringe adapter, reasons for continuing with it and occurrence of UTIs before and during the evaluation period were recorded. In addition, 3 year follow-up data were obtained to assess long-term usage of the syringe adapter.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>Mean follow-up was 4 months. The use of the syringe adapter was successful in 75% and a positive experience in 74% with the latter continuing to use the syringe adapter. Long-term (>3 yrs) adherence of 40% was observed. The patients reported less pain (41%) while 23% reported that it was easier to use compared to conventional catheters. Only 6 UTIs were observed in the follow-up period.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusions:</h3><div>This retrospective study shows that the Ialuadapter® is a good, safe alternative to conventional catheterization for intravesical treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72702,"journal":{"name":"Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 101723"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short and long-term clinical results of a minimally invasive syringe adapter for catheter free instillation of intravesical treatments\",\"authors\":\"Ria Pothoven , Judith A.M. Derks , Erik Arendsen , Dick A.W. Janssen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cont.2024.101723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction:</h3><div>Intravesical treatment is currently dependent on catheterization which can cause urethral discomfort and risk of urinary tract infections in selected patient groups such as interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS), overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) and recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTI). This study describes real-life clinical experience of a minimally invasive syringe adapter (Ialuadapter®) for catheter-free instillation of intravesical treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>A retrospective study from a single center was performed. Quantitative and qualitative data was obtained on the use of the syringe adapter (Ialuadapter®) in 61 patients with IC/BPS (n=48), rUTI (n=6) and mixed /other diagnoses (including OAB; n= 7) who were receiving intravesical therapy. The evaluation period was 6 months during 2018–2019. Reasons for trying the syringe adapter, reasons for continuing with it and occurrence of UTIs before and during the evaluation period were recorded. In addition, 3 year follow-up data were obtained to assess long-term usage of the syringe adapter.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>Mean follow-up was 4 months. The use of the syringe adapter was successful in 75% and a positive experience in 74% with the latter continuing to use the syringe adapter. Long-term (>3 yrs) adherence of 40% was observed. The patients reported less pain (41%) while 23% reported that it was easier to use compared to conventional catheters. Only 6 UTIs were observed in the follow-up period.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusions:</h3><div>This retrospective study shows that the Ialuadapter® is a good, safe alternative to conventional catheterization for intravesical treatment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands)\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101723\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772973724009986\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772973724009986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Short and long-term clinical results of a minimally invasive syringe adapter for catheter free instillation of intravesical treatments
Introduction:
Intravesical treatment is currently dependent on catheterization which can cause urethral discomfort and risk of urinary tract infections in selected patient groups such as interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS), overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) and recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTI). This study describes real-life clinical experience of a minimally invasive syringe adapter (Ialuadapter®) for catheter-free instillation of intravesical treatment.
Methods:
A retrospective study from a single center was performed. Quantitative and qualitative data was obtained on the use of the syringe adapter (Ialuadapter®) in 61 patients with IC/BPS (n=48), rUTI (n=6) and mixed /other diagnoses (including OAB; n= 7) who were receiving intravesical therapy. The evaluation period was 6 months during 2018–2019. Reasons for trying the syringe adapter, reasons for continuing with it and occurrence of UTIs before and during the evaluation period were recorded. In addition, 3 year follow-up data were obtained to assess long-term usage of the syringe adapter.
Results:
Mean follow-up was 4 months. The use of the syringe adapter was successful in 75% and a positive experience in 74% with the latter continuing to use the syringe adapter. Long-term (>3 yrs) adherence of 40% was observed. The patients reported less pain (41%) while 23% reported that it was easier to use compared to conventional catheters. Only 6 UTIs were observed in the follow-up period.
Discussion and conclusions:
This retrospective study shows that the Ialuadapter® is a good, safe alternative to conventional catheterization for intravesical treatment.