排放交易产品的碳减排效果:从产业内碳泄漏的视角

IF 13.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Kaiguo Zhou , Zihuan Guan , Yujun Lian
{"title":"排放交易产品的碳减排效果:从产业内碳泄漏的视角","authors":"Kaiguo Zhou ,&nbsp;Zihuan Guan ,&nbsp;Yujun Lian","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Carbon mitigation within key industries has become a paramount concern in China, yet research focusing on industry-level emissions remains limited despite comprehensive validation of the efficacy of emission trading schemes (ETS) at both enterprise and regional levels. This paper addresses this gap by examining the intra-industry carbon leakage. Firstly, applying multi-period DID method to the industry-level data from 2000 to 2018 in Guangdong province, we empirically find a counterintuitive increase in carbon emissions in the compliance industries despite mitigation efforts by compliance enterprises in the same industries. Secondly, we build a Stackelberg quantity leadership model incorporating ETS and theoretically find that, the intra-industry carbon leakage results in this increased industry-level emissions, notably through the cost crowding-in mechanism. Further theoretical analysis underscores the pivotal role of enhancing ETS coverage ratios for enterprises within compliance industries and bolstering the carbon price mechanism's capacity to accurately reflect enterprises' demand for carbon allowances. Such enhancements are anticipated to effectively mitigate intra-industry carbon leakage and facilitate reductions in industry-level carbon emissions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 107966"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon mitigation effect of emission trading product: Perspective from intra-industry carbon leakage\",\"authors\":\"Kaiguo Zhou ,&nbsp;Zihuan Guan ,&nbsp;Yujun Lian\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Carbon mitigation within key industries has become a paramount concern in China, yet research focusing on industry-level emissions remains limited despite comprehensive validation of the efficacy of emission trading schemes (ETS) at both enterprise and regional levels. This paper addresses this gap by examining the intra-industry carbon leakage. Firstly, applying multi-period DID method to the industry-level data from 2000 to 2018 in Guangdong province, we empirically find a counterintuitive increase in carbon emissions in the compliance industries despite mitigation efforts by compliance enterprises in the same industries. Secondly, we build a Stackelberg quantity leadership model incorporating ETS and theoretically find that, the intra-industry carbon leakage results in this increased industry-level emissions, notably through the cost crowding-in mechanism. Further theoretical analysis underscores the pivotal role of enhancing ETS coverage ratios for enterprises within compliance industries and bolstering the carbon price mechanism's capacity to accurately reflect enterprises' demand for carbon allowances. Such enhancements are anticipated to effectively mitigate intra-industry carbon leakage and facilitate reductions in industry-level carbon emissions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"140 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107966\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324006741\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324006741","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在中国,重点行业的碳减排已成为当务之急,然而,尽管在企业和地区层面对排放交易计划(ETS)的有效性进行了全面验证,但针对行业层面排放的研究仍然有限。本文通过对行业内碳泄漏的研究填补了这一空白。首先,我们对广东省 2000 年至 2018 年的行业层面数据采用多期 DID 方法,实证发现,尽管同行业的履约企业做出了减排努力,但履约行业的碳排放量却出现了反直觉的增长。其次,我们建立了一个包含 ETS 的 Stackelberg 数量领先模型,并从理论上发现,行业内的碳泄漏导致了行业层面的碳排放增加,这主要是通过成本挤入机制实现的。进一步的理论分析强调了提高 ETS 对履约行业内企业的覆盖率和增强碳价格机制准确反映企业对碳配额需求的能力的关键作用。预计这些改进将有效缓解行业内的碳泄漏,促进行业层面碳排放的减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carbon mitigation effect of emission trading product: Perspective from intra-industry carbon leakage
Carbon mitigation within key industries has become a paramount concern in China, yet research focusing on industry-level emissions remains limited despite comprehensive validation of the efficacy of emission trading schemes (ETS) at both enterprise and regional levels. This paper addresses this gap by examining the intra-industry carbon leakage. Firstly, applying multi-period DID method to the industry-level data from 2000 to 2018 in Guangdong province, we empirically find a counterintuitive increase in carbon emissions in the compliance industries despite mitigation efforts by compliance enterprises in the same industries. Secondly, we build a Stackelberg quantity leadership model incorporating ETS and theoretically find that, the intra-industry carbon leakage results in this increased industry-level emissions, notably through the cost crowding-in mechanism. Further theoretical analysis underscores the pivotal role of enhancing ETS coverage ratios for enterprises within compliance industries and bolstering the carbon price mechanism's capacity to accurately reflect enterprises' demand for carbon allowances. Such enhancements are anticipated to effectively mitigate intra-industry carbon leakage and facilitate reductions in industry-level carbon emissions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信