{"title":"排放交易产品的碳减排效果:从产业内碳泄漏的视角","authors":"Kaiguo Zhou , Zihuan Guan , Yujun Lian","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Carbon mitigation within key industries has become a paramount concern in China, yet research focusing on industry-level emissions remains limited despite comprehensive validation of the efficacy of emission trading schemes (ETS) at both enterprise and regional levels. This paper addresses this gap by examining the intra-industry carbon leakage. Firstly, applying multi-period DID method to the industry-level data from 2000 to 2018 in Guangdong province, we empirically find a counterintuitive increase in carbon emissions in the compliance industries despite mitigation efforts by compliance enterprises in the same industries. Secondly, we build a Stackelberg quantity leadership model incorporating ETS and theoretically find that, the intra-industry carbon leakage results in this increased industry-level emissions, notably through the cost crowding-in mechanism. Further theoretical analysis underscores the pivotal role of enhancing ETS coverage ratios for enterprises within compliance industries and bolstering the carbon price mechanism's capacity to accurately reflect enterprises' demand for carbon allowances. Such enhancements are anticipated to effectively mitigate intra-industry carbon leakage and facilitate reductions in industry-level carbon emissions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 107966"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon mitigation effect of emission trading product: Perspective from intra-industry carbon leakage\",\"authors\":\"Kaiguo Zhou , Zihuan Guan , Yujun Lian\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Carbon mitigation within key industries has become a paramount concern in China, yet research focusing on industry-level emissions remains limited despite comprehensive validation of the efficacy of emission trading schemes (ETS) at both enterprise and regional levels. This paper addresses this gap by examining the intra-industry carbon leakage. Firstly, applying multi-period DID method to the industry-level data from 2000 to 2018 in Guangdong province, we empirically find a counterintuitive increase in carbon emissions in the compliance industries despite mitigation efforts by compliance enterprises in the same industries. Secondly, we build a Stackelberg quantity leadership model incorporating ETS and theoretically find that, the intra-industry carbon leakage results in this increased industry-level emissions, notably through the cost crowding-in mechanism. Further theoretical analysis underscores the pivotal role of enhancing ETS coverage ratios for enterprises within compliance industries and bolstering the carbon price mechanism's capacity to accurately reflect enterprises' demand for carbon allowances. Such enhancements are anticipated to effectively mitigate intra-industry carbon leakage and facilitate reductions in industry-level carbon emissions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"140 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107966\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324006741\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324006741","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Carbon mitigation effect of emission trading product: Perspective from intra-industry carbon leakage
Carbon mitigation within key industries has become a paramount concern in China, yet research focusing on industry-level emissions remains limited despite comprehensive validation of the efficacy of emission trading schemes (ETS) at both enterprise and regional levels. This paper addresses this gap by examining the intra-industry carbon leakage. Firstly, applying multi-period DID method to the industry-level data from 2000 to 2018 in Guangdong province, we empirically find a counterintuitive increase in carbon emissions in the compliance industries despite mitigation efforts by compliance enterprises in the same industries. Secondly, we build a Stackelberg quantity leadership model incorporating ETS and theoretically find that, the intra-industry carbon leakage results in this increased industry-level emissions, notably through the cost crowding-in mechanism. Further theoretical analysis underscores the pivotal role of enhancing ETS coverage ratios for enterprises within compliance industries and bolstering the carbon price mechanism's capacity to accurately reflect enterprises' demand for carbon allowances. Such enhancements are anticipated to effectively mitigate intra-industry carbon leakage and facilitate reductions in industry-level carbon emissions.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.