有限深度内的 PMM 数值测试

IF 4.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Junhoi Choi , Yonghwan Kim , Zhang Zhu , Shuguang Wang
{"title":"有限深度内的 PMM 数值测试","authors":"Junhoi Choi ,&nbsp;Yonghwan Kim ,&nbsp;Zhang Zhu ,&nbsp;Shuguang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study conducted a numerical planar motion mechanism (PMM) test for a containership, considering the effects of finite depth. An OpenFOAM-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach was employed to conduct the simulations. Before conducting a series of numerical computations, uncertainty analysis for the grid size and time step was performed to ensure the reliability of the computational results. Two PMM tests, static drift and pure yaw, were conducted, and the results were validated against experimental data. The comparison demonstrated good agreement between forces, moments, and hydrodynamic coefficients when compared with both experimental and other computational results. Furthermore, a comparison between a first- and second-order combination model and a first- and third-order combination model revealed that the latter showed better alignment with experimental data in deep water, while the former performed better in shallow water, emphasizing the role of crossflow. This study contributes to understanding the differences in maneuvering performance between deep and shallow water conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19403,"journal":{"name":"Ocean Engineering","volume":"314 ","pages":"Article 119690"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical PMM test in finite depth\",\"authors\":\"Junhoi Choi ,&nbsp;Yonghwan Kim ,&nbsp;Zhang Zhu ,&nbsp;Shuguang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study conducted a numerical planar motion mechanism (PMM) test for a containership, considering the effects of finite depth. An OpenFOAM-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach was employed to conduct the simulations. Before conducting a series of numerical computations, uncertainty analysis for the grid size and time step was performed to ensure the reliability of the computational results. Two PMM tests, static drift and pure yaw, were conducted, and the results were validated against experimental data. The comparison demonstrated good agreement between forces, moments, and hydrodynamic coefficients when compared with both experimental and other computational results. Furthermore, a comparison between a first- and second-order combination model and a first- and third-order combination model revealed that the latter showed better alignment with experimental data in deep water, while the former performed better in shallow water, emphasizing the role of crossflow. This study contributes to understanding the differences in maneuvering performance between deep and shallow water conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocean Engineering\",\"volume\":\"314 \",\"pages\":\"Article 119690\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocean Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029801824030282\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029801824030282","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

考虑到有限深度的影响,本研究对一艘集装箱船进行了平面运动机构(PMM)数值测试。模拟采用了基于 OpenFOAM 的计算流体动力学(CFD)方法。在进行一系列数值计算之前,对网格大小和时间步长进行了不确定性分析,以确保计算结果的可靠性。进行了静态漂移和纯偏航两个 PMM 测试,并将结果与实验数据进行了验证。比较结果表明,与实验结果和其他计算结果相比,力、力矩和流体力学系数之间的一致性很好。此外,一阶和二阶组合模型与一阶和三阶组合模型之间的比较显示,后者在深水中与实验数据的吻合度更好,而前者在浅水中的表现更好,这强调了横流的作用。这项研究有助于理解深水和浅水条件下操纵性能的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Numerical PMM test in finite depth
This study conducted a numerical planar motion mechanism (PMM) test for a containership, considering the effects of finite depth. An OpenFOAM-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach was employed to conduct the simulations. Before conducting a series of numerical computations, uncertainty analysis for the grid size and time step was performed to ensure the reliability of the computational results. Two PMM tests, static drift and pure yaw, were conducted, and the results were validated against experimental data. The comparison demonstrated good agreement between forces, moments, and hydrodynamic coefficients when compared with both experimental and other computational results. Furthermore, a comparison between a first- and second-order combination model and a first- and third-order combination model revealed that the latter showed better alignment with experimental data in deep water, while the former performed better in shallow water, emphasizing the role of crossflow. This study contributes to understanding the differences in maneuvering performance between deep and shallow water conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ocean Engineering
Ocean Engineering 工程技术-工程:大洋
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
34.00%
发文量
2379
审稿时长
8.1 months
期刊介绍: Ocean Engineering provides a medium for the publication of original research and development work in the field of ocean engineering. Ocean Engineering seeks papers in the following topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信