基岩上阶梯式基脚摇晃破坏机理的实验研究

IF 5.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Xingji Lu , Jinhua Lu , Fangjun Wang , Haoyuan Gao
{"title":"基岩上阶梯式基脚摇晃破坏机理的实验研究","authors":"Xingji Lu ,&nbsp;Jinhua Lu ,&nbsp;Fangjun Wang ,&nbsp;Haoyuan Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The gravity pier with a multiple-step footing is a common substructure system in railway bridges in China, particularly on bedrock. Rocking of this system benefits its seismic performance during the earthquake, but the cantilever part of the stepped footing is vulnerable since it is loaded with a large eccentricity, which has not been well studied. The present paper investigates the failure mechanisms and load capacity of two-layer stepped footing, based on two quasi-static tests and twenty finite element analyses, where four parameters in the stepped footing are studied: the longitudinal reinforcement ratio, the shear span to depth ratio, the critical contact area ratio, and the aspect ratio. In all investigations, the bottom step of the footings fails in flexure. The two quasi-static tests reveal that with the increase of the longitudinal reinforcement ratio in the footing, the load capacity at peak increases, and the damages at the footing are slighter, whereas the damages at the pier body become severe. The finite element models of the two test specimens are first built, and the validations show the finite element results agree well with the test results. The remaining finite element analyses further find that increasing the critical contact area ratio, increasing the aspect ratio, or decreasing the shear span to depth ratio significantly reduces the extent of damage to the footing and increases the load capacities at different damage states. Moreover, the investigations also find damages at the pier body are influenced by the four parameters studied. As the longitudinal reinforcement ratio or critical contact area ratio increases, the damages at the pier body become severe. Whereas, increasing the shear span to depth ratio or the aspect ratio results in slighter damages at the pier body.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"323 ","pages":"Article 119300"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental investigation on failure mechanism of stepped footings rocking on bedrock\",\"authors\":\"Xingji Lu ,&nbsp;Jinhua Lu ,&nbsp;Fangjun Wang ,&nbsp;Haoyuan Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The gravity pier with a multiple-step footing is a common substructure system in railway bridges in China, particularly on bedrock. Rocking of this system benefits its seismic performance during the earthquake, but the cantilever part of the stepped footing is vulnerable since it is loaded with a large eccentricity, which has not been well studied. The present paper investigates the failure mechanisms and load capacity of two-layer stepped footing, based on two quasi-static tests and twenty finite element analyses, where four parameters in the stepped footing are studied: the longitudinal reinforcement ratio, the shear span to depth ratio, the critical contact area ratio, and the aspect ratio. In all investigations, the bottom step of the footings fails in flexure. The two quasi-static tests reveal that with the increase of the longitudinal reinforcement ratio in the footing, the load capacity at peak increases, and the damages at the footing are slighter, whereas the damages at the pier body become severe. The finite element models of the two test specimens are first built, and the validations show the finite element results agree well with the test results. The remaining finite element analyses further find that increasing the critical contact area ratio, increasing the aspect ratio, or decreasing the shear span to depth ratio significantly reduces the extent of damage to the footing and increases the load capacities at different damage states. Moreover, the investigations also find damages at the pier body are influenced by the four parameters studied. As the longitudinal reinforcement ratio or critical contact area ratio increases, the damages at the pier body become severe. Whereas, increasing the shear span to depth ratio or the aspect ratio results in slighter damages at the pier body.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"volume\":\"323 \",\"pages\":\"Article 119300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029624018625\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029624018625","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重力式多台阶墩台是中国铁路桥梁中常见的下部结构体系,尤其是在基岩上。在地震中,这种体系的摇动有利于其抗震性能,但由于阶梯式基脚的悬臂部分受力偏心较大,因此容易受到影响,这一点尚未得到很好的研究。本文基于两次准静力试验和二十次有限元分析,研究了两层阶梯式基脚的破坏机理和承载能力,其中研究了阶梯式基脚的四个参数:纵向配筋比、剪切跨度与深度比、临界接触面积比和长宽比。在所有研究中,基脚底部阶梯都发生了弯曲破坏。两次准静力试验表明,随着基脚纵向配筋率的增加,峰值承载力也随之增加,基脚处的破坏较轻,而墩身处的破坏则变得严重。首先建立了两个试件的有限元模型,验证表明有限元结果与试验结果吻合良好。其余的有限元分析进一步发现,增大临界接触面积比、增大长宽比或减小剪切跨度与深度比,都能显著减小基脚的损坏程度,并提高不同损坏状态下的承载能力。此外,研究还发现墩身的损坏也受到所研究的四个参数的影响。随着纵向配筋率或临界接触面积比的增大,墩身的损坏会变得严重。而增加剪切跨度与深度比或纵横比则会使墩身的损坏程度减轻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental investigation on failure mechanism of stepped footings rocking on bedrock
The gravity pier with a multiple-step footing is a common substructure system in railway bridges in China, particularly on bedrock. Rocking of this system benefits its seismic performance during the earthquake, but the cantilever part of the stepped footing is vulnerable since it is loaded with a large eccentricity, which has not been well studied. The present paper investigates the failure mechanisms and load capacity of two-layer stepped footing, based on two quasi-static tests and twenty finite element analyses, where four parameters in the stepped footing are studied: the longitudinal reinforcement ratio, the shear span to depth ratio, the critical contact area ratio, and the aspect ratio. In all investigations, the bottom step of the footings fails in flexure. The two quasi-static tests reveal that with the increase of the longitudinal reinforcement ratio in the footing, the load capacity at peak increases, and the damages at the footing are slighter, whereas the damages at the pier body become severe. The finite element models of the two test specimens are first built, and the validations show the finite element results agree well with the test results. The remaining finite element analyses further find that increasing the critical contact area ratio, increasing the aspect ratio, or decreasing the shear span to depth ratio significantly reduces the extent of damage to the footing and increases the load capacities at different damage states. Moreover, the investigations also find damages at the pier body are influenced by the four parameters studied. As the longitudinal reinforcement ratio or critical contact area ratio increases, the damages at the pier body become severe. Whereas, increasing the shear span to depth ratio or the aspect ratio results in slighter damages at the pier body.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信