模型结构和输入参数对提高利用 SonReb 估算混凝土强度的人工智能模型性能的影响

IF 5.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Seyed Alireza Alavi, Martin Noel
{"title":"模型结构和输入参数对提高利用 SonReb 估算混凝土强度的人工智能模型性能的影响","authors":"Seyed Alireza Alavi,&nbsp;Martin Noel","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) with the non-intrusive SonReb method, which combines Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) and Rebound Number (RN) to predict concrete compressive strength, has attracted increasing attention in recent years. This study introduces a novel approach to improve AI models for predicting concrete strength, making them more suitable for future practical applications. One of the key challenge in AI models is the number of input parameters; while more inputs often improve accuracy, they are typically impractical for most applications dealing with existing structures (e.g., requiring detailed concrete mix design information that is often unavailable). SonReb AI-based models which use only two input parameters (UPV and RN) have shown reasonable accuracy, but their general use is limited by adoption of different testing standards which precludes the development of large databases. This study aims to improve two-parameter SonReb-based AI models through the addition of a binary input variable that represents the type of the specimen geometry (cube or cylinder) and investigates the effect of model architecture by comparing three different AI algorithms: Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Deep Neural Networks (DNN), and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS). Six AI models were developed using 514 data points from experimental tests and collected data, and an unbiased data splitting method was applied for training and testing. The results showed that including specimen geometry improved model accuracy across all AI algorithms. The results of this study show that regardless of AI architecture, the proposed novel approach not only improves the accuracy of models, but also enables the use of larger databases containing both cubic and cylindrical specimens.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"323 ","pages":"Article 119285"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of model architecture and input parameters to improve performance of artificial intelligence models for estimating concrete strength using SonReb\",\"authors\":\"Seyed Alireza Alavi,&nbsp;Martin Noel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) with the non-intrusive SonReb method, which combines Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) and Rebound Number (RN) to predict concrete compressive strength, has attracted increasing attention in recent years. This study introduces a novel approach to improve AI models for predicting concrete strength, making them more suitable for future practical applications. One of the key challenge in AI models is the number of input parameters; while more inputs often improve accuracy, they are typically impractical for most applications dealing with existing structures (e.g., requiring detailed concrete mix design information that is often unavailable). SonReb AI-based models which use only two input parameters (UPV and RN) have shown reasonable accuracy, but their general use is limited by adoption of different testing standards which precludes the development of large databases. This study aims to improve two-parameter SonReb-based AI models through the addition of a binary input variable that represents the type of the specimen geometry (cube or cylinder) and investigates the effect of model architecture by comparing three different AI algorithms: Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Deep Neural Networks (DNN), and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS). Six AI models were developed using 514 data points from experimental tests and collected data, and an unbiased data splitting method was applied for training and testing. The results showed that including specimen geometry improved model accuracy across all AI algorithms. The results of this study show that regardless of AI architecture, the proposed novel approach not only improves the accuracy of models, but also enables the use of larger databases containing both cubic and cylindrical specimens.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"volume\":\"323 \",\"pages\":\"Article 119285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029624018479\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029624018479","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,人工智能(AI)与非侵入式 SonReb 方法(结合超声波脉冲速度(UPV)和回弹数(RN)来预测混凝土抗压强度)的应用日益受到关注。本研究介绍了一种新方法来改进预测混凝土强度的人工智能模型,使其更适合未来的实际应用。人工智能模型面临的主要挑战之一是输入参数的数量;虽然更多的输入参数往往能提高准确性,但对于大多数处理现有结构的应用来说,它们通常是不切实际的(例如,需要详细的混凝土混合设计信息,而这些信息往往无法获得)。基于 SonReb 的人工智能模型仅使用两个输入参数(UPV 和 RN),已显示出合理的准确性,但由于采用不同的测试标准,无法开发大型数据库,因此其普遍应用受到限制。本研究旨在通过添加代表试样几何形状类型(立方体或圆柱体)的二进制输入变量来改进基于 SonReb 的双参数人工智能模型,并通过比较三种不同的人工智能算法来研究模型结构的影响:人工神经网络 (ANN)、深度神经网络 (DNN) 和自适应神经模糊推理系统 (ANFIS)。利用来自实验测试和收集数据的 514 个数据点开发了六个人工智能模型,并采用无偏数据分割法进行训练和测试。结果表明,在所有人工智能算法中,包含试样几何形状都能提高模型的准确性。研究结果表明,无论采用哪种人工智能架构,所提出的新方法不仅能提高模型的准确性,还能使用包含立方体和圆柱形试样的更大数据库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of model architecture and input parameters to improve performance of artificial intelligence models for estimating concrete strength using SonReb
The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) with the non-intrusive SonReb method, which combines Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) and Rebound Number (RN) to predict concrete compressive strength, has attracted increasing attention in recent years. This study introduces a novel approach to improve AI models for predicting concrete strength, making them more suitable for future practical applications. One of the key challenge in AI models is the number of input parameters; while more inputs often improve accuracy, they are typically impractical for most applications dealing with existing structures (e.g., requiring detailed concrete mix design information that is often unavailable). SonReb AI-based models which use only two input parameters (UPV and RN) have shown reasonable accuracy, but their general use is limited by adoption of different testing standards which precludes the development of large databases. This study aims to improve two-parameter SonReb-based AI models through the addition of a binary input variable that represents the type of the specimen geometry (cube or cylinder) and investigates the effect of model architecture by comparing three different AI algorithms: Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Deep Neural Networks (DNN), and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS). Six AI models were developed using 514 data points from experimental tests and collected data, and an unbiased data splitting method was applied for training and testing. The results showed that including specimen geometry improved model accuracy across all AI algorithms. The results of this study show that regardless of AI architecture, the proposed novel approach not only improves the accuracy of models, but also enables the use of larger databases containing both cubic and cylindrical specimens.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信