用于结构加固的平行钢丝钢筋聚合物和砂浆:介绍和粘结性能

IF 5.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Ali Raji, Reza Zamani Ghaleh, Davood Mostofinejad
{"title":"用于结构加固的平行钢丝钢筋聚合物和砂浆:介绍和粘结性能","authors":"Ali Raji,&nbsp;Reza Zamani Ghaleh,&nbsp;Davood Mostofinejad","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to introduce a cost-effective composite for strengthening/retrofitting concrete elements in bond-critical applications. It comprises a polymeric or cementitious matrix reinforced with parallel high-tensile strength steel wires. 14 concrete prisms were first strengthened with such composites as carbon fiber-reinforced polymer sheets (CFRP), parallel wires steel-reinforced polymer (PW-SRP), and parallel wires steel-reinforced mortar (PW-SRM), and then tested under a direct single lap-shear setup. The study also assesses the efficacy of two surface preparation methods, externally-bonded reinforcement (EBR) and externally-bonded reinforcement on grooves (EBROG), on the bond features of the composites above. In the EBR group, the bond capacity of PW-SRP is 46 % and 85 % higher than that of CFRP and PW-SRM, respectively, while EBROG-CFRP held the first rank in the EBROG group, recording a capacity of 8 % and 54 % higher than the PW-SRP and the PW-SRM. Such results demonstrate the importance and priority of PW-SRP and PW-SRM composites from both resistive and economical considerations. Despite the PW-SRM's low capacity, its cheaper matrix justifies its use. Although the CFRP- and PW-SRM-strengthened samples debonded, the PW-SRP hit the peak failure strain and reached the wire rupture in both surface preparation methods. Moreover, the EBROG kept its superiority over the EBR in the bond capacities of PW-SRP and PW-SRM samples, reaching a capacity of up to 69 % higher than the EBR ones.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"323 ","pages":"Article 119249"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parallel wires steel-reinforced polymer and mortar for structural strengthening: Introducing and bond properties\",\"authors\":\"Ali Raji,&nbsp;Reza Zamani Ghaleh,&nbsp;Davood Mostofinejad\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study aims to introduce a cost-effective composite for strengthening/retrofitting concrete elements in bond-critical applications. It comprises a polymeric or cementitious matrix reinforced with parallel high-tensile strength steel wires. 14 concrete prisms were first strengthened with such composites as carbon fiber-reinforced polymer sheets (CFRP), parallel wires steel-reinforced polymer (PW-SRP), and parallel wires steel-reinforced mortar (PW-SRM), and then tested under a direct single lap-shear setup. The study also assesses the efficacy of two surface preparation methods, externally-bonded reinforcement (EBR) and externally-bonded reinforcement on grooves (EBROG), on the bond features of the composites above. In the EBR group, the bond capacity of PW-SRP is 46 % and 85 % higher than that of CFRP and PW-SRM, respectively, while EBROG-CFRP held the first rank in the EBROG group, recording a capacity of 8 % and 54 % higher than the PW-SRP and the PW-SRM. Such results demonstrate the importance and priority of PW-SRP and PW-SRM composites from both resistive and economical considerations. Despite the PW-SRM's low capacity, its cheaper matrix justifies its use. Although the CFRP- and PW-SRM-strengthened samples debonded, the PW-SRP hit the peak failure strain and reached the wire rupture in both surface preparation methods. Moreover, the EBROG kept its superiority over the EBR in the bond capacities of PW-SRP and PW-SRM samples, reaching a capacity of up to 69 % higher than the EBR ones.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"volume\":\"323 \",\"pages\":\"Article 119249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014102962401811X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014102962401811X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在引入一种经济高效的复合材料,用于加固/改造对粘结力要求极高的混凝土构件。它由聚合物或水泥基质与平行的高强度钢丝组成。首先用碳纤维增强聚合物片(CFRP)、平行钢丝增强聚合物(PW-SRP)和平行钢丝增强砂浆(PW-SRM)等复合材料对 14 个混凝土棱柱体进行了加固,然后在直接单搭接剪切设置下进行了测试。研究还评估了两种表面处理方法(外部粘结加固(EBR)和沟槽外部粘结加固(EBROG))对上述复合材料粘结特性的影响。在 EBR 组中,PW-SRP 的粘结能力分别比 CFRP 和 PW-SRM 高 46 % 和 85 %,而 EBROG-CFRP 在 EBROG 组中排名第一,粘结能力分别比 PW-SRP 和 PW-SRM 高 8 % 和 54 %。这些结果表明,无论从阻力还是从经济角度考虑,PW-SRP 和 PW-SRM 复合材料都非常重要且具有优先性。尽管 PW-SRM 的承载能力较低,但其较便宜的基体证明了其使用的合理性。尽管 CFRP 和 PW-SRM 增强样品发生了脱落,但 PW-SRP 在两种表面制备方法中都达到了峰值破坏应变,并达到了断丝。此外,在 PW-SRP 和 PW-SRM 样品的粘结能力方面,EBROG 仍优于 EBR,比 EBR 高出 69%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Parallel wires steel-reinforced polymer and mortar for structural strengthening: Introducing and bond properties
This study aims to introduce a cost-effective composite for strengthening/retrofitting concrete elements in bond-critical applications. It comprises a polymeric or cementitious matrix reinforced with parallel high-tensile strength steel wires. 14 concrete prisms were first strengthened with such composites as carbon fiber-reinforced polymer sheets (CFRP), parallel wires steel-reinforced polymer (PW-SRP), and parallel wires steel-reinforced mortar (PW-SRM), and then tested under a direct single lap-shear setup. The study also assesses the efficacy of two surface preparation methods, externally-bonded reinforcement (EBR) and externally-bonded reinforcement on grooves (EBROG), on the bond features of the composites above. In the EBR group, the bond capacity of PW-SRP is 46 % and 85 % higher than that of CFRP and PW-SRM, respectively, while EBROG-CFRP held the first rank in the EBROG group, recording a capacity of 8 % and 54 % higher than the PW-SRP and the PW-SRM. Such results demonstrate the importance and priority of PW-SRP and PW-SRM composites from both resistive and economical considerations. Despite the PW-SRM's low capacity, its cheaper matrix justifies its use. Although the CFRP- and PW-SRM-strengthened samples debonded, the PW-SRP hit the peak failure strain and reached the wire rupture in both surface preparation methods. Moreover, the EBROG kept its superiority over the EBR in the bond capacities of PW-SRP and PW-SRM samples, reaching a capacity of up to 69 % higher than the EBR ones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信