宏观审慎政策如何影响金融开放与银行风险承担之间的关系

IF 7.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Hui-Jun Li , Deng-Kui Si , Meng-Long Chen
{"title":"宏观审慎政策如何影响金融开放与银行风险承担之间的关系","authors":"Hui-Jun Li ,&nbsp;Deng-Kui Si ,&nbsp;Meng-Long Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.eap.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates how macroprudential policy affects the relationship between financial openness and bank risk-taking by utilizing Chinese commercial banking data from 2005 to 2021. We find that financial openness generally promotes bank risk-taking. Robustness checks consistently support this finding, including variable substitutions, sample period adjustments, controlling for other shocks, and endogeneity concerns. The impact of financial openness on risk-taking demonstrates potential heterogeneity, contingent upon factors such as bank financing constraints, risk management, and financial regulation. We delineate credit, interest rate, and asset price channels through which financial openness affects bank risk-taking, notably by amplifying bank credit volumes, diminishing credit asset ratios, compressing net interest margins and spreads, and elevating asset prices. Macroprudential policies are identified as effective countermeasures against the heightened bank risk-taking associated with financial openness, with the effectiveness of these policies varying by the specific regulatory instruments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54200,"journal":{"name":"Economic Analysis and Policy","volume":"84 ","pages":"Pages 1820-1839"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How does macroprudential policy affect the relationship between financial openness and bank risk-taking\",\"authors\":\"Hui-Jun Li ,&nbsp;Deng-Kui Si ,&nbsp;Meng-Long Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eap.2024.11.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper investigates how macroprudential policy affects the relationship between financial openness and bank risk-taking by utilizing Chinese commercial banking data from 2005 to 2021. We find that financial openness generally promotes bank risk-taking. Robustness checks consistently support this finding, including variable substitutions, sample period adjustments, controlling for other shocks, and endogeneity concerns. The impact of financial openness on risk-taking demonstrates potential heterogeneity, contingent upon factors such as bank financing constraints, risk management, and financial regulation. We delineate credit, interest rate, and asset price channels through which financial openness affects bank risk-taking, notably by amplifying bank credit volumes, diminishing credit asset ratios, compressing net interest margins and spreads, and elevating asset prices. Macroprudential policies are identified as effective countermeasures against the heightened bank risk-taking associated with financial openness, with the effectiveness of these policies varying by the specific regulatory instruments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Analysis and Policy\",\"volume\":\"84 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1820-1839\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Analysis and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592624003163\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592624003163","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文利用 2005 年至 2021 年的中国商业银行数据,研究了宏观审慎政策如何影响金融开放与银行风险承担之间的关系。我们发现,金融开放总体上促进了银行的风险承担。稳健性检验一致支持这一结论,包括变量替代、样本期调整、控制其他冲击以及内生性问题。金融开放对风险承担的影响表现出潜在的异质性,取决于银行融资约束、风险管理和金融监管等因素。我们划分了信贷、利率和资产价格渠道,金融开放通过这些渠道影响银行的风险承担,特别是通过放大银行信贷量、降低信贷资产比率、压缩净息差和利差以及提高资产价格。宏观审慎政策被认为是应对与金融开放相关的银行风险承担增加的有效措施,这些政策的有效性因具体监管工具而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How does macroprudential policy affect the relationship between financial openness and bank risk-taking
This paper investigates how macroprudential policy affects the relationship between financial openness and bank risk-taking by utilizing Chinese commercial banking data from 2005 to 2021. We find that financial openness generally promotes bank risk-taking. Robustness checks consistently support this finding, including variable substitutions, sample period adjustments, controlling for other shocks, and endogeneity concerns. The impact of financial openness on risk-taking demonstrates potential heterogeneity, contingent upon factors such as bank financing constraints, risk management, and financial regulation. We delineate credit, interest rate, and asset price channels through which financial openness affects bank risk-taking, notably by amplifying bank credit volumes, diminishing credit asset ratios, compressing net interest margins and spreads, and elevating asset prices. Macroprudential policies are identified as effective countermeasures against the heightened bank risk-taking associated with financial openness, with the effectiveness of these policies varying by the specific regulatory instruments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.20%
发文量
231
审稿时长
93 days
期刊介绍: Economic Analysis and Policy (established 1970) publishes articles from all branches of economics with a particular focus on research, theoretical and applied, which has strong policy relevance. The journal also publishes survey articles and empirical replications on key policy issues. Authors are expected to highlight the main insights in a non-technical introduction and in the conclusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信