多目标灵活作业车间绿色调度问题的多群体协同进化算法,带自动导引车和可变处理速度约束

IF 8.2 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Chao Liu , Yuyan Han , Yuting Wang , Junqing Li , Yiping Liu
{"title":"多目标灵活作业车间绿色调度问题的多群体协同进化算法,带自动导引车和可变处理速度约束","authors":"Chao Liu ,&nbsp;Yuyan Han ,&nbsp;Yuting Wang ,&nbsp;Junqing Li ,&nbsp;Yiping Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.swevo.2024.101774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study focuses on addressing a multi-objective Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Problem with Automated Guided Vehicles (FJSP-AGVs) and variable processing speed constraints. First, a position-based mixed integer linear programming model (MILP) is proposed to optimize simultaneously the maximum completion time and the total energy consumption. Then, we decompose FJSP-AGVs into four interrelated subproblems and design a Multi-Population Coevolutionary Algorithm (MCEA) to solve them. In MCEA, (1) The effective encoding and decoding methods are used to accurately reflect the characteristics of the problem, and generate feasible scheduling solutions. (2) A multi-rule-based heuristic is proposed to enrich the diversity of four populations. (3) A disjunctive graph is constructed to depict and obtain the critical path(s). On this basis, (4) two cooperative evolution strategies based on critical paths are proposed to facilitate collaborative evolution between different populations and improve the global search capability of the algorithm. Furthermore, (5) a consumption reduction strategy is proposed by reducing the processing speed of operations on non-critical paths while ensuring that it does not affect the makespan. Finally, we validate the effectiveness of MCEA by GD, and IGD, and set coverage metrics on the four typical benchmark datasets. Based on the average GD (IGD) metric across 65 instances, MCEA shows reductions of 77.63% (93.60%), 95.30% (97.27%), and 96.17%(97.89%) relative to EHA, EMOEA, and mop-BRKGA, respectively. The set coverage metric, MCEA outperforms EHA, EMOEA, and mop-BRKGA in 59, 64, and 64 instances, respectively. These results clearly indicate that MCEA can solve the FJSP-AGVs with variable processing speed constraints.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48682,"journal":{"name":"Swarm and Evolutionary Computation","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 101774"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-population coevolutionary algorithm for a green multi-objective flexible job shop scheduling problem with automated guided vehicles and variable processing speed constraints\",\"authors\":\"Chao Liu ,&nbsp;Yuyan Han ,&nbsp;Yuting Wang ,&nbsp;Junqing Li ,&nbsp;Yiping Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.swevo.2024.101774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study focuses on addressing a multi-objective Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Problem with Automated Guided Vehicles (FJSP-AGVs) and variable processing speed constraints. First, a position-based mixed integer linear programming model (MILP) is proposed to optimize simultaneously the maximum completion time and the total energy consumption. Then, we decompose FJSP-AGVs into four interrelated subproblems and design a Multi-Population Coevolutionary Algorithm (MCEA) to solve them. In MCEA, (1) The effective encoding and decoding methods are used to accurately reflect the characteristics of the problem, and generate feasible scheduling solutions. (2) A multi-rule-based heuristic is proposed to enrich the diversity of four populations. (3) A disjunctive graph is constructed to depict and obtain the critical path(s). On this basis, (4) two cooperative evolution strategies based on critical paths are proposed to facilitate collaborative evolution between different populations and improve the global search capability of the algorithm. Furthermore, (5) a consumption reduction strategy is proposed by reducing the processing speed of operations on non-critical paths while ensuring that it does not affect the makespan. Finally, we validate the effectiveness of MCEA by GD, and IGD, and set coverage metrics on the four typical benchmark datasets. Based on the average GD (IGD) metric across 65 instances, MCEA shows reductions of 77.63% (93.60%), 95.30% (97.27%), and 96.17%(97.89%) relative to EHA, EMOEA, and mop-BRKGA, respectively. The set coverage metric, MCEA outperforms EHA, EMOEA, and mop-BRKGA in 59, 64, and 64 instances, respectively. These results clearly indicate that MCEA can solve the FJSP-AGVs with variable processing speed constraints.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Swarm and Evolutionary Computation\",\"volume\":\"91 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101774\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Swarm and Evolutionary Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210650224003122\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swarm and Evolutionary Computation","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210650224003122","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的重点是解决带有自动导引车(FJSP-AGVs)和可变处理速度约束的多目标灵活作业车间调度问题。首先,我们提出了一个基于位置的混合整数线性规划模型(MILP),以同时优化最大完成时间和总能耗。然后,我们将 FJSP-AGV 分解为四个相互关联的子问题,并设计了一种多人群协同进化算法(MCEA)来解决这些问题。在 MCEA 中,(1) 采用有效的编码和解码方法,准确反映问题的特征,生成可行的调度方案。(2) 提出基于多规则的启发式,丰富四个种群的多样性。(3) 构建离析图来描述和获取关键路径。在此基础上,(4) 提出了两种基于临界路径的合作进化策略,以促进不同种群之间的合作进化,提高算法的全局搜索能力。此外,(5) 我们还提出了一种减少消耗的策略,即在确保不影响有效时间的前提下,降低非关键路径上操作的处理速度。最后,我们通过 GD 和 IGD 验证了 MCEA 的有效性,并在四个典型基准数据集上设置了覆盖率指标。基于 65 个实例的平均 GD (IGD) 指标,MCEA 与 EHA、EMOEA 和 mop-BRKGA 相比,分别降低了 77.63% (93.60%)、95.30% (97.27%) 和 96.17% (97.89%)。在集合覆盖率指标上,MCEA 在 59、64 和 64 个实例中的表现分别优于 EHA、EMOEA 和 mop-BRKGA。这些结果清楚地表明,MCEA 可以解决处理速度受限的 FJSP-AGV 问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-population coevolutionary algorithm for a green multi-objective flexible job shop scheduling problem with automated guided vehicles and variable processing speed constraints
This study focuses on addressing a multi-objective Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Problem with Automated Guided Vehicles (FJSP-AGVs) and variable processing speed constraints. First, a position-based mixed integer linear programming model (MILP) is proposed to optimize simultaneously the maximum completion time and the total energy consumption. Then, we decompose FJSP-AGVs into four interrelated subproblems and design a Multi-Population Coevolutionary Algorithm (MCEA) to solve them. In MCEA, (1) The effective encoding and decoding methods are used to accurately reflect the characteristics of the problem, and generate feasible scheduling solutions. (2) A multi-rule-based heuristic is proposed to enrich the diversity of four populations. (3) A disjunctive graph is constructed to depict and obtain the critical path(s). On this basis, (4) two cooperative evolution strategies based on critical paths are proposed to facilitate collaborative evolution between different populations and improve the global search capability of the algorithm. Furthermore, (5) a consumption reduction strategy is proposed by reducing the processing speed of operations on non-critical paths while ensuring that it does not affect the makespan. Finally, we validate the effectiveness of MCEA by GD, and IGD, and set coverage metrics on the four typical benchmark datasets. Based on the average GD (IGD) metric across 65 instances, MCEA shows reductions of 77.63% (93.60%), 95.30% (97.27%), and 96.17%(97.89%) relative to EHA, EMOEA, and mop-BRKGA, respectively. The set coverage metric, MCEA outperforms EHA, EMOEA, and mop-BRKGA in 59, 64, and 64 instances, respectively. These results clearly indicate that MCEA can solve the FJSP-AGVs with variable processing speed constraints.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Swarm and Evolutionary Computation
Swarm and Evolutionary Computation COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCEC-COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
169
期刊介绍: Swarm and Evolutionary Computation is a pioneering peer-reviewed journal focused on the latest research and advancements in nature-inspired intelligent computation using swarm and evolutionary algorithms. It covers theoretical, experimental, and practical aspects of these paradigms and their hybrids, promoting interdisciplinary research. The journal prioritizes the publication of high-quality, original articles that push the boundaries of evolutionary computation and swarm intelligence. Additionally, it welcomes survey papers on current topics and novel applications. Topics of interest include but are not limited to: Genetic Algorithms, and Genetic Programming, Evolution Strategies, and Evolutionary Programming, Differential Evolution, Artificial Immune Systems, Particle Swarms, Ant Colony, Bacterial Foraging, Artificial Bees, Fireflies Algorithm, Harmony Search, Artificial Life, Digital Organisms, Estimation of Distribution Algorithms, Stochastic Diffusion Search, Quantum Computing, Nano Computing, Membrane Computing, Human-centric Computing, Hybridization of Algorithms, Memetic Computing, Autonomic Computing, Self-organizing systems, Combinatorial, Discrete, Binary, Constrained, Multi-objective, Multi-modal, Dynamic, and Large-scale Optimization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信