黄金分割量表:研究不同背景下性格力量失衡的新方法

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Robert E. McGrath , Ryan M. Niemiec , Bina Westrich
{"title":"黄金分割量表:研究不同背景下性格力量失衡的新方法","authors":"Robert E. McGrath ,&nbsp;Ryan M. Niemiec ,&nbsp;Bina Westrich","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We introduce a new instrument called the Golden Mean Inventory (GMI). Founded on the proposition that the evaluation of deficiencies or excesses in the use of character strengths represents an important extension of the understanding and applied use of character strength concepts, the GMI was developed as a 72-item instrument addressing what has been called underuse/‌optimal use/‌overuse in each of the 24 VIA character strengths in three contexts: work/‌school, relationships, and goal pursuit. Four a priori hypotheses were largely supported. Relationships with demographic variables were generally negligible. The GMI potentially detects both positive and problematic strengths use, idiographic patterns of strengths use, and context-specific patterns of strengths use. The evidence provided here raises important questions about whether high scores on measures of positive functioning combine individuals who are operating in a highly effective manner with others who are demonstrating “too much of a good thing.”</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"234 ","pages":"Article 112951"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Golden Mean Inventory: A new approach to studying character strengths imbalances across contexts\",\"authors\":\"Robert E. McGrath ,&nbsp;Ryan M. Niemiec ,&nbsp;Bina Westrich\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We introduce a new instrument called the Golden Mean Inventory (GMI). Founded on the proposition that the evaluation of deficiencies or excesses in the use of character strengths represents an important extension of the understanding and applied use of character strength concepts, the GMI was developed as a 72-item instrument addressing what has been called underuse/‌optimal use/‌overuse in each of the 24 VIA character strengths in three contexts: work/‌school, relationships, and goal pursuit. Four a priori hypotheses were largely supported. Relationships with demographic variables were generally negligible. The GMI potentially detects both positive and problematic strengths use, idiographic patterns of strengths use, and context-specific patterns of strengths use. The evidence provided here raises important questions about whether high scores on measures of positive functioning combine individuals who are operating in a highly effective manner with others who are demonstrating “too much of a good thing.”</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"234 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112951\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924004112\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924004112","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们介绍一种名为 "黄金分割量表"(GMI)的新工具。评估性格优势使用的不足或过度是对性格优势概念的理解和应用的重要延伸,基于这一主张,我们开发了金中线量表,该量表共有 72 个项目,分别针对工作/学业、人际关系和目标追求这三种情境中的 24 种 VIA 性格优势中每一种优势的使用不足/最佳使用/过度情况。四项先验假设基本得到支持。与人口统计学变量的关系一般可以忽略不计。GMI 可以检测出积极的和有问题的特长使用情况、特长使用的成因模式以及特长使用的特定情境模式。这里提供的证据提出了一些重要问题,即在积极功能测量中获得高分的人是否将以高效方式工作的人与其他表现出 "好东西太多 "的人结合在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Golden Mean Inventory: A new approach to studying character strengths imbalances across contexts
We introduce a new instrument called the Golden Mean Inventory (GMI). Founded on the proposition that the evaluation of deficiencies or excesses in the use of character strengths represents an important extension of the understanding and applied use of character strength concepts, the GMI was developed as a 72-item instrument addressing what has been called underuse/‌optimal use/‌overuse in each of the 24 VIA character strengths in three contexts: work/‌school, relationships, and goal pursuit. Four a priori hypotheses were largely supported. Relationships with demographic variables were generally negligible. The GMI potentially detects both positive and problematic strengths use, idiographic patterns of strengths use, and context-specific patterns of strengths use. The evidence provided here raises important questions about whether high scores on measures of positive functioning combine individuals who are operating in a highly effective manner with others who are demonstrating “too much of a good thing.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信