道德上的自我矛盾引物有助于提高青少年的认知灵活性

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Jiwen Li, Tengfei Du, Jianchao Tang, Juan Yang
{"title":"道德上的自我矛盾引物有助于提高青少年的认知灵活性","authors":"Jiwen Li,&nbsp;Tengfei Du,&nbsp;Jianchao Tang,&nbsp;Juan Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Some evidence has indicated that ambivalent attitudes can influence cognitive processes, leading to increased cognitive flexibility. It is unknown whether self-ambivalence, the simultaneous holding of conflicting self-views, would affect cognitive flexibility. The present research investigated the influence of sub-dimensions of self-ambivalence, including self-worth and moral ambivalence, on cognitive flexibility in young adults. Given that prior research links ambivalence with increased top-down attention, which is thought to promote mental shifting abilities, this study hypothesized that self-ambivalence would promote cognitive flexibility. In Study 1, participants completed the Self-Ambivalence Measure (SAM) questionnaire and the number-letter switching task. Results revealed a significant negative correlation between moral ambivalence and switching costs (RT), while self-worth ambivalence showed no significant correlation with switching costs. Study 2 examined the causal relationship between self-ambivalence and cognitive flexibility by manipulating self-worth and moral ambivalence. Results showed that only moral ambivalence priming reduced switching costs, while self-worth ambivalence priming had no significant effect in studies 2a and 2b. The study found a facilitating effect of moral ambivalence, while there was no significant effect of self-worth ambivalence, which may be because morality is one of the core components of self-concept and that conflict triggers negative emotions as well as deeper cognitive processing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"234 ","pages":"Article 112948"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Priming moral self-ambivalence facilitates cognitive flexibility in young adults\",\"authors\":\"Jiwen Li,&nbsp;Tengfei Du,&nbsp;Jianchao Tang,&nbsp;Juan Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Some evidence has indicated that ambivalent attitudes can influence cognitive processes, leading to increased cognitive flexibility. It is unknown whether self-ambivalence, the simultaneous holding of conflicting self-views, would affect cognitive flexibility. The present research investigated the influence of sub-dimensions of self-ambivalence, including self-worth and moral ambivalence, on cognitive flexibility in young adults. Given that prior research links ambivalence with increased top-down attention, which is thought to promote mental shifting abilities, this study hypothesized that self-ambivalence would promote cognitive flexibility. In Study 1, participants completed the Self-Ambivalence Measure (SAM) questionnaire and the number-letter switching task. Results revealed a significant negative correlation between moral ambivalence and switching costs (RT), while self-worth ambivalence showed no significant correlation with switching costs. Study 2 examined the causal relationship between self-ambivalence and cognitive flexibility by manipulating self-worth and moral ambivalence. Results showed that only moral ambivalence priming reduced switching costs, while self-worth ambivalence priming had no significant effect in studies 2a and 2b. The study found a facilitating effect of moral ambivalence, while there was no significant effect of self-worth ambivalence, which may be because morality is one of the core components of self-concept and that conflict triggers negative emotions as well as deeper cognitive processing.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"234 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112948\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924004082\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924004082","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一些证据表明,矛盾的态度可以影响认知过程,从而提高认知灵活性。而自我矛盾,即同时持有相互冲突的自我观点,是否会影响认知灵活性,目前还不得而知。本研究调查了自我矛盾的子维度(包括自我价值和道德矛盾)对青少年认知灵活性的影响。鉴于之前的研究将矛盾心理与自上而下注意力的增加联系起来,而自上而下注意力的增加被认为会促进思维转换能力,因此本研究假设自我矛盾心理会促进认知灵活性。在研究 1 中,参与者完成了自我矛盾测量(SAM)问卷和数字字母转换任务。结果显示,道德矛盾心理与转换成本(RT)呈显著负相关,而自我价值矛盾心理与转换成本无显著相关。研究 2 通过操纵自我价值感和道德矛盾感,考察了自我矛盾感与认知灵活性之间的因果关系。结果显示,在研究 2a 和研究 2b 中,只有道德矛盾心理引物降低了转换成本,而自我价值矛盾心理引物则没有显著影响。研究发现,道德矛盾心理具有促进作用,而自我价值矛盾心理没有显著影响,这可能是因为道德是自我概念的核心组成部分之一,冲突会引发负面情绪以及更深层次的认知加工。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Priming moral self-ambivalence facilitates cognitive flexibility in young adults
Some evidence has indicated that ambivalent attitudes can influence cognitive processes, leading to increased cognitive flexibility. It is unknown whether self-ambivalence, the simultaneous holding of conflicting self-views, would affect cognitive flexibility. The present research investigated the influence of sub-dimensions of self-ambivalence, including self-worth and moral ambivalence, on cognitive flexibility in young adults. Given that prior research links ambivalence with increased top-down attention, which is thought to promote mental shifting abilities, this study hypothesized that self-ambivalence would promote cognitive flexibility. In Study 1, participants completed the Self-Ambivalence Measure (SAM) questionnaire and the number-letter switching task. Results revealed a significant negative correlation between moral ambivalence and switching costs (RT), while self-worth ambivalence showed no significant correlation with switching costs. Study 2 examined the causal relationship between self-ambivalence and cognitive flexibility by manipulating self-worth and moral ambivalence. Results showed that only moral ambivalence priming reduced switching costs, while self-worth ambivalence priming had no significant effect in studies 2a and 2b. The study found a facilitating effect of moral ambivalence, while there was no significant effect of self-worth ambivalence, which may be because morality is one of the core components of self-concept and that conflict triggers negative emotions as well as deeper cognitive processing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信