关于正确评估基于节点中心边缘方案的截断误差阶数

IF 2.5 3区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Cosimo Tarsia Morisco, Hiroaki Nishikawa
{"title":"关于正确评估基于节点中心边缘方案的截断误差阶数","authors":"Cosimo Tarsia Morisco,&nbsp;Hiroaki Nishikawa","doi":"10.1016/j.compfluid.2024.106470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this short note, we present a simple analysis to show that an observed order of truncation error on a regular grid can change, if not correctly evaluated, depending on the choice of the norm and also on the discretization scheme. For a second-order scheme, it can be first order, second order, or anywhere in between. Using the node-centered edge-based discretization as an example, we provide a guide on how to evaluate the order of truncation error correctly: one should evaluate it separately for a set of nodes, where the residual stencil is symmetric and the same at every node, and the rest of nodes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":287,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Fluids","volume":"285 ","pages":"Article 106470"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On correctly evaluating orders of truncation error for node-centered edge-based schemes\",\"authors\":\"Cosimo Tarsia Morisco,&nbsp;Hiroaki Nishikawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compfluid.2024.106470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In this short note, we present a simple analysis to show that an observed order of truncation error on a regular grid can change, if not correctly evaluated, depending on the choice of the norm and also on the discretization scheme. For a second-order scheme, it can be first order, second order, or anywhere in between. Using the node-centered edge-based discretization as an example, we provide a guide on how to evaluate the order of truncation error correctly: one should evaluate it separately for a set of nodes, where the residual stencil is symmetric and the same at every node, and the rest of nodes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Fluids\",\"volume\":\"285 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106470\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Fluids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045793024003013\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045793024003013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇短文中,我们通过一个简单的分析表明,在常规网格上观察到的截断误差阶数,如果没有得到正确的评估,会随着规范的选择和离散化方案的不同而发生变化。对于二阶方案,它可以是一阶、二阶或介于两者之间的任何一阶。以以节点为中心的基于边缘的离散化为例,我们为如何正确评估截断误差的阶数提供了指导:我们应该分别评估一组节点和其他节点的截断误差,前者的残余模版是对称的,并且在每个节点上都是相同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On correctly evaluating orders of truncation error for node-centered edge-based schemes
In this short note, we present a simple analysis to show that an observed order of truncation error on a regular grid can change, if not correctly evaluated, depending on the choice of the norm and also on the discretization scheme. For a second-order scheme, it can be first order, second order, or anywhere in between. Using the node-centered edge-based discretization as an example, we provide a guide on how to evaluate the order of truncation error correctly: one should evaluate it separately for a set of nodes, where the residual stencil is symmetric and the same at every node, and the rest of nodes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Fluids
Computers & Fluids 物理-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Fluids is multidisciplinary. The term ''fluid'' is interpreted in the broadest sense. Hydro- and aerodynamics, high-speed and physical gas dynamics, turbulence and flow stability, multiphase flow, rheology, tribology and fluid-structure interaction are all of interest, provided that computer technique plays a significant role in the associated studies or design methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信