在线外科教学计划中医科学生的参与度和学习方法:横断面研究

IF 1.4 Q3 SURGERY
Sumayyah Ebrahim MMED Surgery (UKZN), MSc Epidemiology (Columbia University) , Jacqueline Marina Van Wyk PhD (UKZN)
{"title":"在线外科教学计划中医科学生的参与度和学习方法:横断面研究","authors":"Sumayyah Ebrahim MMED Surgery (UKZN), MSc Epidemiology (Columbia University) ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Marina Van Wyk PhD (UKZN)","doi":"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.10.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The COVID-19 pandemic prompted the transition of all teaching and learning of final-year General Surgery students to an online platform. Despite the utility of online methods, challenges exist such as a sense of impersonal learning, and poor student engagement. Student engagement with course content is important for deep learning. An Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE) and a revised Biggs Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) were used to evaluate student engagement and learning approaches respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2021 at a South African university. The OSE and R-SPQ-2F online survey tools were administered to all final-year students (<em>n</em> = 325) enrolled in the surgical online module. Quantitative data was collected, and the data was analysed statistically using R-Statistical computing software. Results are presented in the form of descriptive and inferential statistics. The reliability of the tools was evaluated by Cronbach's alpha.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The survey response rate was 35.4 % (115/325). Students were engaged at a high level, and the median (IQR) scores of the OSE tool were 71.0 (63.0–78.0). Overall, students adopted a deep approach (DA) to learning, with median (IQR) scores of 34.0 (30.0–39.0) on the R-SPQ-2F tool. There was a moderate positive correlation between the total OSE score and DA (0.53, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Both the OSE and R-SPQ-2F tools showed an acceptable level of internal consistency of 0.893 and 0.806 respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Student engagement was associated with deep learning approaches. The OSE and R-SPQ-2F tools were reliable tools to measure student engagement and learning approaches among medical students.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74892,"journal":{"name":"Surgery open science","volume":"22 ","pages":"Pages 53-60"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engagement and learning approaches among medical students in an online surgical teaching programme: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Sumayyah Ebrahim MMED Surgery (UKZN), MSc Epidemiology (Columbia University) ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Marina Van Wyk PhD (UKZN)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.10.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The COVID-19 pandemic prompted the transition of all teaching and learning of final-year General Surgery students to an online platform. Despite the utility of online methods, challenges exist such as a sense of impersonal learning, and poor student engagement. Student engagement with course content is important for deep learning. An Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE) and a revised Biggs Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) were used to evaluate student engagement and learning approaches respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2021 at a South African university. The OSE and R-SPQ-2F online survey tools were administered to all final-year students (<em>n</em> = 325) enrolled in the surgical online module. Quantitative data was collected, and the data was analysed statistically using R-Statistical computing software. Results are presented in the form of descriptive and inferential statistics. The reliability of the tools was evaluated by Cronbach's alpha.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The survey response rate was 35.4 % (115/325). Students were engaged at a high level, and the median (IQR) scores of the OSE tool were 71.0 (63.0–78.0). Overall, students adopted a deep approach (DA) to learning, with median (IQR) scores of 34.0 (30.0–39.0) on the R-SPQ-2F tool. There was a moderate positive correlation between the total OSE score and DA (0.53, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Both the OSE and R-SPQ-2F tools showed an acceptable level of internal consistency of 0.893 and 0.806 respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Student engagement was associated with deep learning approaches. The OSE and R-SPQ-2F tools were reliable tools to measure student engagement and learning approaches among medical students.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery open science\",\"volume\":\"22 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 53-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery open science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024001325\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024001325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景COVID-19大流行促使普外科毕业班学生的所有教学和学习过渡到在线平台。尽管在线教学方法很有用,但也存在一些挑战,如学习缺乏人情味、学生参与度低等。学生对课程内容的参与对于深度学习非常重要。我们使用在线学生参与度量表(OSE)和修订版比格斯双因素学习过程问卷(R-SPQ-2F)来分别评估学生的参与度和学习方法。OSE和R-SPQ-2F在线调查工具的使用对象是所有参加外科在线模块学习的毕业班学生(n = 325)。收集了定量数据,并使用 R-Statistical 计算软件对数据进行了统计分析。结果以描述性和推论性统计的形式呈现。调查回复率为 35.4%(115/325)。学生的参与度很高,OSE 工具的中位数(IQR)为 71.0(63.0-78.0)。总体而言,学生采用了深度学习法(DA),R-SPQ-2F 工具的中位数(IQR)为 34.0(30.0-39.0)分。OSE 总分与 "深度学习 "之间存在中度正相关(0.53,p < 0.001)。OSE和R-SPQ-2F工具的内部一致性分别为0.893和0.806,都达到了可接受的水平。OSE和R-SPQ-2F工具是测量医学生参与度和学习方法的可靠工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Engagement and learning approaches among medical students in an online surgical teaching programme: A cross-sectional study

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic prompted the transition of all teaching and learning of final-year General Surgery students to an online platform. Despite the utility of online methods, challenges exist such as a sense of impersonal learning, and poor student engagement. Student engagement with course content is important for deep learning. An Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE) and a revised Biggs Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) were used to evaluate student engagement and learning approaches respectively.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2021 at a South African university. The OSE and R-SPQ-2F online survey tools were administered to all final-year students (n = 325) enrolled in the surgical online module. Quantitative data was collected, and the data was analysed statistically using R-Statistical computing software. Results are presented in the form of descriptive and inferential statistics. The reliability of the tools was evaluated by Cronbach's alpha.

Results

The survey response rate was 35.4 % (115/325). Students were engaged at a high level, and the median (IQR) scores of the OSE tool were 71.0 (63.0–78.0). Overall, students adopted a deep approach (DA) to learning, with median (IQR) scores of 34.0 (30.0–39.0) on the R-SPQ-2F tool. There was a moderate positive correlation between the total OSE score and DA (0.53, p < 0.001). Both the OSE and R-SPQ-2F tools showed an acceptable level of internal consistency of 0.893 and 0.806 respectively.

Conclusions

Student engagement was associated with deep learning approaches. The OSE and R-SPQ-2F tools were reliable tools to measure student engagement and learning approaches among medical students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信