{"title":"单层牛胶原蛋白-弹性蛋白细胞外基质临床应用系统综述","authors":"David M. Hill","doi":"10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Dermal substitutes have significantly changed the practice of caring for acute and chronic wounds, earning a place on the reconstructive ladder. MatriDerm is a single-layer acellular dermal matrix composed of bovine collagen types I, III, and V with added bovine elastin (CEM). It was developed in the 1990′s, has been commercially available outside of the US since 2005, and received FDA clearance for use in the US in 2021. The objective of this study was to review the published literature to identify an exhaustive list of references describing the clinical use of CEM and summarize the findings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An extensive search of PubMed and Google Scholar was performed to identify manuscripts describing the clinical use of CEM. Manuscripts were excluded if they were primarily animal models, in vitro studies, reviews, expert opinion articles, or lacked sufficient detail. Google Translate was utilized when necessary.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five hundred and thirty-five manuscripts containing potential details of CEM usage were identified. After exclusions, 128 remained (13 randomized control trials, 30 cohort studies, and 85 case series/reports) originating from 38 countries, including nearly 2,600 clinical cases dating back to 1995. Cases varied considerably and included: burns, acute traumatic injuries, chronic wounds, and soft tissue reconstruction in patients ranging from pediatric to the elderly. A single-stage procedure (CEM placement and covered with an autograft in the same procedure) was the most reported technique, but autograft application in a later procedure was also reported. Negative pressure wound therapy was utilized in many of the studies. Study endpoints varied widely and included graft take, several objective scar scales, cutometer/durometer measures, range of motion, patient satisfaction scores, and histology.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is an extensive body of global literature dating back to the 1990’s documenting CEM successfully utilized as a dermal matrix for a vast number of patients and indications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72486,"journal":{"name":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of the clinical use of a single-layer bovine collagen-elastin acellular dermal matrix\",\"authors\":\"David M. Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Dermal substitutes have significantly changed the practice of caring for acute and chronic wounds, earning a place on the reconstructive ladder. MatriDerm is a single-layer acellular dermal matrix composed of bovine collagen types I, III, and V with added bovine elastin (CEM). It was developed in the 1990′s, has been commercially available outside of the US since 2005, and received FDA clearance for use in the US in 2021. The objective of this study was to review the published literature to identify an exhaustive list of references describing the clinical use of CEM and summarize the findings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An extensive search of PubMed and Google Scholar was performed to identify manuscripts describing the clinical use of CEM. Manuscripts were excluded if they were primarily animal models, in vitro studies, reviews, expert opinion articles, or lacked sufficient detail. Google Translate was utilized when necessary.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five hundred and thirty-five manuscripts containing potential details of CEM usage were identified. After exclusions, 128 remained (13 randomized control trials, 30 cohort studies, and 85 case series/reports) originating from 38 countries, including nearly 2,600 clinical cases dating back to 1995. Cases varied considerably and included: burns, acute traumatic injuries, chronic wounds, and soft tissue reconstruction in patients ranging from pediatric to the elderly. A single-stage procedure (CEM placement and covered with an autograft in the same procedure) was the most reported technique, but autograft application in a later procedure was also reported. Negative pressure wound therapy was utilized in many of the studies. Study endpoints varied widely and included graft take, several objective scar scales, cutometer/durometer measures, range of motion, patient satisfaction scores, and histology.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is an extensive body of global literature dating back to the 1990’s documenting CEM successfully utilized as a dermal matrix for a vast number of patients and indications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912224000683\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912224000683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:真皮替代品极大地改变了急慢性伤口的护理方法,在重建阶梯上占据了一席之地。MatriDerm 是一种单层无细胞真皮基质,由 I、III 和 V 型牛胶原组成,并添加了牛弹性蛋白 (CEM)。它于 20 世纪 90 年代研发成功,自 2005 年起在美国以外的国家上市,并于 2021 年获得美国食品及药物管理局批准在美国使用。本研究的目的是对已发表的文献进行回顾,找出描述 CEM 临床应用的详尽参考文献列表,并对研究结果进行总结。如果手稿主要是动物模型、体外研究、综述、专家意见文章或缺乏足够的细节,则将其排除在外。必要时使用谷歌翻译。结果共找到 535 篇包含 CEM 用途潜在细节的手稿。经排除后,剩下的 128 篇文章(13 篇随机对照试验、30 篇队列研究和 85 篇病例系列/报告)来自 38 个国家,包括近 2,600 个临床病例,最早可追溯到 1995 年。病例差异很大,包括烧伤、急性外伤、慢性伤口和软组织重建,患者从儿童到老人不等。报告最多的技术是单阶段手术(在同一手术中放置 CEM 并用自体移植物覆盖),但也有在后期手术中应用自体移植物的报道。许多研究都采用了负压伤口疗法。研究终点差异很大,包括移植物取材、几种客观疤痕量表、切口计/硬度计测量、活动范围、患者满意度评分和组织学。结论早在 20 世纪 90 年代,全球就有大量文献记录了 CEM 作为真皮基质成功应用于大量患者和适应症的情况。
A systematic review of the clinical use of a single-layer bovine collagen-elastin acellular dermal matrix
Introduction
Dermal substitutes have significantly changed the practice of caring for acute and chronic wounds, earning a place on the reconstructive ladder. MatriDerm is a single-layer acellular dermal matrix composed of bovine collagen types I, III, and V with added bovine elastin (CEM). It was developed in the 1990′s, has been commercially available outside of the US since 2005, and received FDA clearance for use in the US in 2021. The objective of this study was to review the published literature to identify an exhaustive list of references describing the clinical use of CEM and summarize the findings.
Methods
An extensive search of PubMed and Google Scholar was performed to identify manuscripts describing the clinical use of CEM. Manuscripts were excluded if they were primarily animal models, in vitro studies, reviews, expert opinion articles, or lacked sufficient detail. Google Translate was utilized when necessary.
Results
Five hundred and thirty-five manuscripts containing potential details of CEM usage were identified. After exclusions, 128 remained (13 randomized control trials, 30 cohort studies, and 85 case series/reports) originating from 38 countries, including nearly 2,600 clinical cases dating back to 1995. Cases varied considerably and included: burns, acute traumatic injuries, chronic wounds, and soft tissue reconstruction in patients ranging from pediatric to the elderly. A single-stage procedure (CEM placement and covered with an autograft in the same procedure) was the most reported technique, but autograft application in a later procedure was also reported. Negative pressure wound therapy was utilized in many of the studies. Study endpoints varied widely and included graft take, several objective scar scales, cutometer/durometer measures, range of motion, patient satisfaction scores, and histology.
Conclusions
There is an extensive body of global literature dating back to the 1990’s documenting CEM successfully utilized as a dermal matrix for a vast number of patients and indications.