瑞典和挪威加工工业对去碳化挑战的看法

IF 5.8 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Markus Steen , Johnn Andersson , Hans Hellsmark , Teis Hansen , Jens Hanson , Elizaveta Johansson
{"title":"瑞典和挪威加工工业对去碳化挑战的看法","authors":"Markus Steen ,&nbsp;Johnn Andersson ,&nbsp;Hans Hellsmark ,&nbsp;Teis Hansen ,&nbsp;Jens Hanson ,&nbsp;Elizaveta Johansson","doi":"10.1016/j.egycc.2024.100167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The energy-intensive process industries (EPIs) account for a high share of global carbon emissions but have so far been slow to decarbonise. One of the reasons for the slow pace is that central problems and solutions are contested among stakeholders. To develop effective and inclusive transition policy, a better understanding of different perspectives on decarbonisation challenges is needed. In this paper, we use Q methodology to address this gap with an analysis of EPI decarbonisation in Sweden and Norway. The research draws on 50 interviews where different types of stakeholders sorted and reflected upon statements that describe potential decarbonisation challenges. Through factor analysis, we identify four salient narratives in each country, which emphasise different problems and trade-offs. However, we also find similarities across the narratives, both within and across countries. A key challenge that is emphasized in both countries is to ensure a sufficient supply of electricity at competitive prices. Ultimately, we demonstrate how these findings are important for providing policy recommendations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72914,"journal":{"name":"Energy and climate change","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100167"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of decarbonisation challenges for the process industry in Sweden and Norway\",\"authors\":\"Markus Steen ,&nbsp;Johnn Andersson ,&nbsp;Hans Hellsmark ,&nbsp;Teis Hansen ,&nbsp;Jens Hanson ,&nbsp;Elizaveta Johansson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.egycc.2024.100167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The energy-intensive process industries (EPIs) account for a high share of global carbon emissions but have so far been slow to decarbonise. One of the reasons for the slow pace is that central problems and solutions are contested among stakeholders. To develop effective and inclusive transition policy, a better understanding of different perspectives on decarbonisation challenges is needed. In this paper, we use Q methodology to address this gap with an analysis of EPI decarbonisation in Sweden and Norway. The research draws on 50 interviews where different types of stakeholders sorted and reflected upon statements that describe potential decarbonisation challenges. Through factor analysis, we identify four salient narratives in each country, which emphasise different problems and trade-offs. However, we also find similarities across the narratives, both within and across countries. A key challenge that is emphasized in both countries is to ensure a sufficient supply of electricity at competitive prices. Ultimately, we demonstrate how these findings are important for providing policy recommendations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy and climate change\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy and climate change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666278724000436\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and climate change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666278724000436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

能源密集型加工工业(EPIs)在全球碳排放中占有很高的比例,但迄今为止,其去碳化的步伐却十分缓慢。进展缓慢的原因之一是利益相关者对核心问题和解决方案存在争议。为了制定有效、包容的过渡政策,需要更好地理解有关去碳化挑战的不同观点。在本文中,我们使用 Q 方法对瑞典和挪威的 EPI 去碳化进行分析,以弥补这一不足。研究借鉴了 50 次访谈,不同类型的利益相关者对描述潜在去碳化挑战的陈述进行了分类和反思。通过因素分析,我们确定了每个国家的四种突出叙述,它们强调了不同的问题和权衡。不过,我们也发现各国内部和各国之间的叙述有相似之处。两国都强调的一个关键挑战是确保以具有竞争力的价格提供充足的电力供应。最后,我们将展示这些发现对于提供政策建议的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceptions of decarbonisation challenges for the process industry in Sweden and Norway
The energy-intensive process industries (EPIs) account for a high share of global carbon emissions but have so far been slow to decarbonise. One of the reasons for the slow pace is that central problems and solutions are contested among stakeholders. To develop effective and inclusive transition policy, a better understanding of different perspectives on decarbonisation challenges is needed. In this paper, we use Q methodology to address this gap with an analysis of EPI decarbonisation in Sweden and Norway. The research draws on 50 interviews where different types of stakeholders sorted and reflected upon statements that describe potential decarbonisation challenges. Through factor analysis, we identify four salient narratives in each country, which emphasise different problems and trade-offs. However, we also find similarities across the narratives, both within and across countries. A key challenge that is emphasized in both countries is to ensure a sufficient supply of electricity at competitive prices. Ultimately, we demonstrate how these findings are important for providing policy recommendations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and climate change
Energy and climate change Global and Planetary Change, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信