通过实验和计算研究评估中高温管壳式潜热蓄热器的热流体特性

IF 5.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Alok K. Ray , Dibakar Rakshit , K. Ravi Kumar , Hal Gurgenci
{"title":"通过实验和计算研究评估中高温管壳式潜热蓄热器的热流体特性","authors":"Alok K. Ray ,&nbsp;Dibakar Rakshit ,&nbsp;K. Ravi Kumar ,&nbsp;Hal Gurgenci","doi":"10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study envisages a holistic experimental methodology encompassing the entire spectrum of formulation, characterization, and thermal response evaluation of a medium–high-temperature (MHT) phase change material (PCM). The heating rate in melting is significantly less than the cooling rate during solidification until PCM reaches phase transition temperature. For q“ = 1000 W/m<sup>2</sup>, charging duration of vertical domain (θ = 90°) is 15 % slower than horizontal domain (θ = 0°). However, with increase in flux to 2000 W/m<sup>2</sup> the charging duration is only 6 % slower for θ = 90° than θ = 0°. Melting/charging duration for thermocouple positioned at A (r = 18 mm, top side of prototype) is 15.38 % lower than at F (r = 18 mm, bottom side of prototype) and positioned at C (r = 38 mm, top side) is 8 % lower than at D (r = 38 mm, bottom side) for horizontally orientated LHTES system. A substantial decrease (by 17.64 %) in discharging duration was observed with increase in the inlet flow rate and the inlet temperature by 2.5 times and 3.3 times, respectively. The total energy accumulated in the LHTES demonstrates an approximately 11 % increase with the escalation of electric flux from 1000 W/m<sup>2</sup> to 2000 W/m<sup>2</sup> during the charging process for θ = 0° orientation. In contrast to charging, faster solidification rate is observed in the bottom half of the prototype (points D, E, F) compared to the top half (points A, B, C) which has implications for the design and operation of LHTES systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23062,"journal":{"name":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 102969"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of thermofluidic behaviour of a Medium-High-Temperature shell and tube latent heat storage through experimental and computational investigation\",\"authors\":\"Alok K. Ray ,&nbsp;Dibakar Rakshit ,&nbsp;K. Ravi Kumar ,&nbsp;Hal Gurgenci\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The study envisages a holistic experimental methodology encompassing the entire spectrum of formulation, characterization, and thermal response evaluation of a medium–high-temperature (MHT) phase change material (PCM). The heating rate in melting is significantly less than the cooling rate during solidification until PCM reaches phase transition temperature. For q“ = 1000 W/m<sup>2</sup>, charging duration of vertical domain (θ = 90°) is 15 % slower than horizontal domain (θ = 0°). However, with increase in flux to 2000 W/m<sup>2</sup> the charging duration is only 6 % slower for θ = 90° than θ = 0°. Melting/charging duration for thermocouple positioned at A (r = 18 mm, top side of prototype) is 15.38 % lower than at F (r = 18 mm, bottom side of prototype) and positioned at C (r = 38 mm, top side) is 8 % lower than at D (r = 38 mm, bottom side) for horizontally orientated LHTES system. A substantial decrease (by 17.64 %) in discharging duration was observed with increase in the inlet flow rate and the inlet temperature by 2.5 times and 3.3 times, respectively. The total energy accumulated in the LHTES demonstrates an approximately 11 % increase with the escalation of electric flux from 1000 W/m<sup>2</sup> to 2000 W/m<sup>2</sup> during the charging process for θ = 0° orientation. In contrast to charging, faster solidification rate is observed in the bottom half of the prototype (points D, E, F) compared to the top half (points A, B, C) which has implications for the design and operation of LHTES systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress\",\"volume\":\"56 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102969\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451904924005870\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451904924005870","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用了一种整体实验方法,涵盖了中高温(MHT)相变材料(PCM)的配方、表征和热响应评估的整个过程。在 PCM 达到相变温度之前,熔化过程中的加热速率明显低于凝固过程中的冷却速率。q" = 1000 W/m2 时,垂直域(θ = 90°)的充电持续时间比水平域(θ = 0°)慢 15%。然而,当通量增加到 2000 W/m2 时,θ = 90° 的充电持续时间只比θ = 0° 慢 6%。对于水平方向的 LHTES 系统,位于 A 处(r = 18 毫米,原型机顶部)的热电偶的熔化/充电持续时间比位于 F 处(r = 18 毫米,原型机底部)的热电偶的熔化/充电持续时间短 15.38%,位于 C 处(r = 38 毫米,原型机顶部)的热电偶的熔化/充电持续时间比位于 D 处(r = 38 毫米,原型机底部)的热电偶的熔化/充电持续时间短 8%。入口流速和入口温度分别提高 2.5 倍和 3.3 倍后,放电持续时间大幅缩短(17.64%)。在 θ = 0° 方向的充电过程中,随着电通量从 1000 W/m2 增加到 2000 W/m2,LHTES 中积累的总能量增加了约 11%。与充电相反,原型的下半部分(D、E、F 点)与上半部分(A、B、C 点)相比,凝固速度更快,这对 LHTES 系统的设计和运行具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of thermofluidic behaviour of a Medium-High-Temperature shell and tube latent heat storage through experimental and computational investigation
The study envisages a holistic experimental methodology encompassing the entire spectrum of formulation, characterization, and thermal response evaluation of a medium–high-temperature (MHT) phase change material (PCM). The heating rate in melting is significantly less than the cooling rate during solidification until PCM reaches phase transition temperature. For q“ = 1000 W/m2, charging duration of vertical domain (θ = 90°) is 15 % slower than horizontal domain (θ = 0°). However, with increase in flux to 2000 W/m2 the charging duration is only 6 % slower for θ = 90° than θ = 0°. Melting/charging duration for thermocouple positioned at A (r = 18 mm, top side of prototype) is 15.38 % lower than at F (r = 18 mm, bottom side of prototype) and positioned at C (r = 38 mm, top side) is 8 % lower than at D (r = 38 mm, bottom side) for horizontally orientated LHTES system. A substantial decrease (by 17.64 %) in discharging duration was observed with increase in the inlet flow rate and the inlet temperature by 2.5 times and 3.3 times, respectively. The total energy accumulated in the LHTES demonstrates an approximately 11 % increase with the escalation of electric flux from 1000 W/m2 to 2000 W/m2 during the charging process for θ = 0° orientation. In contrast to charging, faster solidification rate is observed in the bottom half of the prototype (points D, E, F) compared to the top half (points A, B, C) which has implications for the design and operation of LHTES systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress Chemical Engineering-Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.40%
发文量
327
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Thermal Science and Engineering Progress (TSEP) publishes original, high-quality research articles that span activities ranging from fundamental scientific research and discussion of the more controversial thermodynamic theories, to developments in thermal engineering that are in many instances examples of the way scientists and engineers are addressing the challenges facing a growing population – smart cities and global warming – maximising thermodynamic efficiencies and minimising all heat losses. It is intended that these will be of current relevance and interest to industry, academia and other practitioners. It is evident that many specialised journals in thermal and, to some extent, in fluid disciplines tend to focus on topics that can be classified as fundamental in nature, or are ‘applied’ and near-market. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress will bridge the gap between these two areas, allowing authors to make an easy choice, should they or a journal editor feel that their papers are ‘out of scope’ when considering other journals. The range of topics covered by Thermal Science and Engineering Progress addresses the rapid rate of development being made in thermal transfer processes as they affect traditional fields, and important growth in the topical research areas of aerospace, thermal biological and medical systems, electronics and nano-technologies, renewable energy systems, food production (including agriculture), and the need to minimise man-made thermal impacts on climate change. Review articles on appropriate topics for TSEP are encouraged, although until TSEP is fully established, these will be limited in number. Before submitting such articles, please contact one of the Editors, or a member of the Editorial Advisory Board with an outline of your proposal and your expertise in the area of your review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信