Alok K. Ray , Dibakar Rakshit , K. Ravi Kumar , Hal Gurgenci
{"title":"通过实验和计算研究评估中高温管壳式潜热蓄热器的热流体特性","authors":"Alok K. Ray , Dibakar Rakshit , K. Ravi Kumar , Hal Gurgenci","doi":"10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study envisages a holistic experimental methodology encompassing the entire spectrum of formulation, characterization, and thermal response evaluation of a medium–high-temperature (MHT) phase change material (PCM). The heating rate in melting is significantly less than the cooling rate during solidification until PCM reaches phase transition temperature. For q“ = 1000 W/m<sup>2</sup>, charging duration of vertical domain (θ = 90°) is 15 % slower than horizontal domain (θ = 0°). However, with increase in flux to 2000 W/m<sup>2</sup> the charging duration is only 6 % slower for θ = 90° than θ = 0°. Melting/charging duration for thermocouple positioned at A (r = 18 mm, top side of prototype) is 15.38 % lower than at F (r = 18 mm, bottom side of prototype) and positioned at C (r = 38 mm, top side) is 8 % lower than at D (r = 38 mm, bottom side) for horizontally orientated LHTES system. A substantial decrease (by 17.64 %) in discharging duration was observed with increase in the inlet flow rate and the inlet temperature by 2.5 times and 3.3 times, respectively. The total energy accumulated in the LHTES demonstrates an approximately 11 % increase with the escalation of electric flux from 1000 W/m<sup>2</sup> to 2000 W/m<sup>2</sup> during the charging process for θ = 0° orientation. In contrast to charging, faster solidification rate is observed in the bottom half of the prototype (points D, E, F) compared to the top half (points A, B, C) which has implications for the design and operation of LHTES systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23062,"journal":{"name":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 102969"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of thermofluidic behaviour of a Medium-High-Temperature shell and tube latent heat storage through experimental and computational investigation\",\"authors\":\"Alok K. Ray , Dibakar Rakshit , K. Ravi Kumar , Hal Gurgenci\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The study envisages a holistic experimental methodology encompassing the entire spectrum of formulation, characterization, and thermal response evaluation of a medium–high-temperature (MHT) phase change material (PCM). The heating rate in melting is significantly less than the cooling rate during solidification until PCM reaches phase transition temperature. For q“ = 1000 W/m<sup>2</sup>, charging duration of vertical domain (θ = 90°) is 15 % slower than horizontal domain (θ = 0°). However, with increase in flux to 2000 W/m<sup>2</sup> the charging duration is only 6 % slower for θ = 90° than θ = 0°. Melting/charging duration for thermocouple positioned at A (r = 18 mm, top side of prototype) is 15.38 % lower than at F (r = 18 mm, bottom side of prototype) and positioned at C (r = 38 mm, top side) is 8 % lower than at D (r = 38 mm, bottom side) for horizontally orientated LHTES system. A substantial decrease (by 17.64 %) in discharging duration was observed with increase in the inlet flow rate and the inlet temperature by 2.5 times and 3.3 times, respectively. The total energy accumulated in the LHTES demonstrates an approximately 11 % increase with the escalation of electric flux from 1000 W/m<sup>2</sup> to 2000 W/m<sup>2</sup> during the charging process for θ = 0° orientation. In contrast to charging, faster solidification rate is observed in the bottom half of the prototype (points D, E, F) compared to the top half (points A, B, C) which has implications for the design and operation of LHTES systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress\",\"volume\":\"56 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102969\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451904924005870\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451904924005870","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of thermofluidic behaviour of a Medium-High-Temperature shell and tube latent heat storage through experimental and computational investigation
The study envisages a holistic experimental methodology encompassing the entire spectrum of formulation, characterization, and thermal response evaluation of a medium–high-temperature (MHT) phase change material (PCM). The heating rate in melting is significantly less than the cooling rate during solidification until PCM reaches phase transition temperature. For q“ = 1000 W/m2, charging duration of vertical domain (θ = 90°) is 15 % slower than horizontal domain (θ = 0°). However, with increase in flux to 2000 W/m2 the charging duration is only 6 % slower for θ = 90° than θ = 0°. Melting/charging duration for thermocouple positioned at A (r = 18 mm, top side of prototype) is 15.38 % lower than at F (r = 18 mm, bottom side of prototype) and positioned at C (r = 38 mm, top side) is 8 % lower than at D (r = 38 mm, bottom side) for horizontally orientated LHTES system. A substantial decrease (by 17.64 %) in discharging duration was observed with increase in the inlet flow rate and the inlet temperature by 2.5 times and 3.3 times, respectively. The total energy accumulated in the LHTES demonstrates an approximately 11 % increase with the escalation of electric flux from 1000 W/m2 to 2000 W/m2 during the charging process for θ = 0° orientation. In contrast to charging, faster solidification rate is observed in the bottom half of the prototype (points D, E, F) compared to the top half (points A, B, C) which has implications for the design and operation of LHTES systems.
期刊介绍:
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress (TSEP) publishes original, high-quality research articles that span activities ranging from fundamental scientific research and discussion of the more controversial thermodynamic theories, to developments in thermal engineering that are in many instances examples of the way scientists and engineers are addressing the challenges facing a growing population – smart cities and global warming – maximising thermodynamic efficiencies and minimising all heat losses. It is intended that these will be of current relevance and interest to industry, academia and other practitioners. It is evident that many specialised journals in thermal and, to some extent, in fluid disciplines tend to focus on topics that can be classified as fundamental in nature, or are ‘applied’ and near-market. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress will bridge the gap between these two areas, allowing authors to make an easy choice, should they or a journal editor feel that their papers are ‘out of scope’ when considering other journals. The range of topics covered by Thermal Science and Engineering Progress addresses the rapid rate of development being made in thermal transfer processes as they affect traditional fields, and important growth in the topical research areas of aerospace, thermal biological and medical systems, electronics and nano-technologies, renewable energy systems, food production (including agriculture), and the need to minimise man-made thermal impacts on climate change. Review articles on appropriate topics for TSEP are encouraged, although until TSEP is fully established, these will be limited in number. Before submitting such articles, please contact one of the Editors, or a member of the Editorial Advisory Board with an outline of your proposal and your expertise in the area of your review.