Kyle L. McCormick MD, Michael A. Mastroianni MD, Carl H. Herndon MD, Nana O. Sarpong MD, MBA, Roshan P. Shah MD, H. John Cooper MD, Alexander L. Neuwirth MD, Jeffrey A. Geller MD
{"title":"股骨颈骨折全髋关节置换术的前路与后路方法","authors":"Kyle L. McCormick MD, Michael A. Mastroianni MD, Carl H. Herndon MD, Nana O. Sarpong MD, MBA, Roshan P. Shah MD, H. John Cooper MD, Alexander L. Neuwirth MD, Jeffrey A. Geller MD","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to compare complication rates and clinical outcomes at 1 year or until death based on the surgical approach for total hip replacement in femoral neck fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study was performed on 101 patients with displaced femoral neck fractures at our institution between 2005 and 2022. All surgeries were performed by fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons via either a posterior Kocher-Langenbeck approach, an abductor sparing anterolateral approach, or a direct anterior approach. Demographics were collected, as well as intraoperative characteristics, discharge information, and complications.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-seven patients underwent a direct anterior approach, 42 underwent an abductor sparing anterolateral approach, and 22 underwent a posterior approach, with no significant difference in demographics between the groups. Of patients, 43.3% were able to be discharged home, while 55.4% of patients went to subacute rehab or other nursing home facility. There was a 30.6% complication rate, a 7% reoperation rate, and a 0.9% dislocation rate. The posterior group was more likely to be discharged to rehab instead of home (82.0% compared to 48.6%, <em>P</em> = .0054) and had a significant increase in complication rate (<em>P</em> = .04). There was a 36.3% rate of transfusion in the posterior group compared to a 5.0% rate in the anterior group (<em>P</em> < .0001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Anterior-based total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in our series demonstrated a significantly lower rate of postoperative complications, a lower rate of transfusion, and a significantly higher rate of being discharged home.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level III.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 101573"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anterior Versus Posterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty in Femoral Neck Fractures\",\"authors\":\"Kyle L. McCormick MD, Michael A. Mastroianni MD, Carl H. Herndon MD, Nana O. Sarpong MD, MBA, Roshan P. Shah MD, H. John Cooper MD, Alexander L. Neuwirth MD, Jeffrey A. Geller MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to compare complication rates and clinical outcomes at 1 year or until death based on the surgical approach for total hip replacement in femoral neck fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study was performed on 101 patients with displaced femoral neck fractures at our institution between 2005 and 2022. All surgeries were performed by fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons via either a posterior Kocher-Langenbeck approach, an abductor sparing anterolateral approach, or a direct anterior approach. Demographics were collected, as well as intraoperative characteristics, discharge information, and complications.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-seven patients underwent a direct anterior approach, 42 underwent an abductor sparing anterolateral approach, and 22 underwent a posterior approach, with no significant difference in demographics between the groups. Of patients, 43.3% were able to be discharged home, while 55.4% of patients went to subacute rehab or other nursing home facility. There was a 30.6% complication rate, a 7% reoperation rate, and a 0.9% dislocation rate. The posterior group was more likely to be discharged to rehab instead of home (82.0% compared to 48.6%, <em>P</em> = .0054) and had a significant increase in complication rate (<em>P</em> = .04). There was a 36.3% rate of transfusion in the posterior group compared to a 5.0% rate in the anterior group (<em>P</em> < .0001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Anterior-based total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in our series demonstrated a significantly lower rate of postoperative complications, a lower rate of transfusion, and a significantly higher rate of being discharged home.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level III.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroplasty Today\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101573\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroplasty Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344124002589\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344124002589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Anterior Versus Posterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty in Femoral Neck Fractures
Background
The purpose of this study was to compare complication rates and clinical outcomes at 1 year or until death based on the surgical approach for total hip replacement in femoral neck fractures.
Methods
This retrospective study was performed on 101 patients with displaced femoral neck fractures at our institution between 2005 and 2022. All surgeries were performed by fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons via either a posterior Kocher-Langenbeck approach, an abductor sparing anterolateral approach, or a direct anterior approach. Demographics were collected, as well as intraoperative characteristics, discharge information, and complications.
Results
Thirty-seven patients underwent a direct anterior approach, 42 underwent an abductor sparing anterolateral approach, and 22 underwent a posterior approach, with no significant difference in demographics between the groups. Of patients, 43.3% were able to be discharged home, while 55.4% of patients went to subacute rehab or other nursing home facility. There was a 30.6% complication rate, a 7% reoperation rate, and a 0.9% dislocation rate. The posterior group was more likely to be discharged to rehab instead of home (82.0% compared to 48.6%, P = .0054) and had a significant increase in complication rate (P = .04). There was a 36.3% rate of transfusion in the posterior group compared to a 5.0% rate in the anterior group (P < .0001).
Conclusions
Anterior-based total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in our series demonstrated a significantly lower rate of postoperative complications, a lower rate of transfusion, and a significantly higher rate of being discharged home.
期刊介绍:
Arthroplasty Today is a companion journal to the Journal of Arthroplasty. The journal Arthroplasty Today brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement of the hip and knee in an open-access, online format. Arthroplasty Today solicits manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas of scientific endeavor that relate to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with patient outcomes, economic and policy issues, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, and biologic response to arthroplasty. The journal focuses on case reports. It is the purpose of Arthroplasty Today to present material to practicing orthopaedic surgeons that will keep them abreast of developments in the field, prove useful in the care of patients, and aid in understanding the scientific foundation of this subspecialty area of joint replacement. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal''s area of interest. Their participation ensures that each issue of Arthroplasty Today provides the reader with timely, peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality.