行人对链接和网络属性有何偏好?印度两座城市的联合实验结果

Dipanjan Nag , Arkopal Kishore Goswami
{"title":"行人对链接和网络属性有何偏好?印度两座城市的联合实验结果","authors":"Dipanjan Nag ,&nbsp;Arkopal Kishore Goswami","doi":"10.1016/j.eastsj.2024.100153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent literature underscores perceived walkability as more influential than objective walkability on walking behaviour. However, existing network evaluation tools conduct walking network assessment objectively using spatial data and rarely assess the perceived network-related attributes. This key problem is to be investigated for Indian cities where walking environment improvements are emphasised only on a few link-level (micro-scale) elements and not coherently replicated over the network. The current research evaluates users' preference towards ten link- and three network-related attributes using conjoint analysis. A pictorial survey instrument was created to record users' responses in two Indian cities. Results showed that link and network attributes were jointly more important than link attributes alone. Moreover, practitioners could interpret the ‘middle’ attribute level in a conjoint model and identify low tolerance link and network attributes. These results give decision-makers insight into the type and level of improvements required while enhancing the walking environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100131,"journal":{"name":"Asian Transport Studies","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What are pedestrian preferences of link and network attributes? Results of conjoint experiments in two Indian cities\",\"authors\":\"Dipanjan Nag ,&nbsp;Arkopal Kishore Goswami\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eastsj.2024.100153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Recent literature underscores perceived walkability as more influential than objective walkability on walking behaviour. However, existing network evaluation tools conduct walking network assessment objectively using spatial data and rarely assess the perceived network-related attributes. This key problem is to be investigated for Indian cities where walking environment improvements are emphasised only on a few link-level (micro-scale) elements and not coherently replicated over the network. The current research evaluates users' preference towards ten link- and three network-related attributes using conjoint analysis. A pictorial survey instrument was created to record users' responses in two Indian cities. Results showed that link and network attributes were jointly more important than link attributes alone. Moreover, practitioners could interpret the ‘middle’ attribute level in a conjoint model and identify low tolerance link and network attributes. These results give decision-makers insight into the type and level of improvements required while enhancing the walking environment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Transport Studies\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Transport Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2185556024000312\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Transport Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2185556024000312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的文献强调,感知的步行可达性比客观的步行可达性对步行行为的影响更大。然而,现有的网络评估工具都是利用空间数据对步行网络进行客观评估,很少对感知到的网络相关属性进行评估。这一关键问题需要针对印度城市进行调查,因为在印度城市,步行环境的改善只被强调在几个链接层面(微观尺度)的元素上,而没有在整个网络中连贯地复制。目前的研究采用联合分析法评估了用户对 10 个链接和 3 个网络相关属性的偏好。在印度的两个城市制作了一个图形调查工具来记录用户的回答。结果显示,链接和网络属性共同比单独的链接属性更重要。此外,从业人员还能解释联合模型中的 "中间 "属性水平,并识别容错率低的链接和网络属性。这些结果让决策者了解到在改善步行环境时所需的改进类型和水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What are pedestrian preferences of link and network attributes? Results of conjoint experiments in two Indian cities
Recent literature underscores perceived walkability as more influential than objective walkability on walking behaviour. However, existing network evaluation tools conduct walking network assessment objectively using spatial data and rarely assess the perceived network-related attributes. This key problem is to be investigated for Indian cities where walking environment improvements are emphasised only on a few link-level (micro-scale) elements and not coherently replicated over the network. The current research evaluates users' preference towards ten link- and three network-related attributes using conjoint analysis. A pictorial survey instrument was created to record users' responses in two Indian cities. Results showed that link and network attributes were jointly more important than link attributes alone. Moreover, practitioners could interpret the ‘middle’ attribute level in a conjoint model and identify low tolerance link and network attributes. These results give decision-makers insight into the type and level of improvements required while enhancing the walking environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信