量化多时成像中已恢复河岸缓冲区划分的准确性和可探测性

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ge Pu , Lindi J. Quackenbush , John C. Stella
{"title":"量化多时成像中已恢复河岸缓冲区划分的准确性和可探测性","authors":"Ge Pu ,&nbsp;Lindi J. Quackenbush ,&nbsp;John C. Stella","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We used multitemporal imagery to map tree cover and quantify the accuracy and detectability of planted riparian buffers. We used data with two spatial resolutions and found that classification of 1 m National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery using a texture-based automatic delineation process matched visual interpretation in terms of both accuracy of tree cover mapping and detectability. In contrast, our method struggled to detect vegetation changes in the riparian buffers using moderate resolution 30 m Land Change Monitoring, Assessment, and Projection (LCMAP) data. Overall pixel-based map accuracy of buffer tree cover using the 1 m automatic process averaged 96 %, while the 30 m LCMAP-based maps had an average accuracy of 37 %. Using the 1 m NAIP imagery, we found on average it took 6 years for planted buffer trees to reach a 50 % detectability level, and 11 years to reach 100 % detectability. Detectability of riparian tree cover increased from 13 % to 98 % 11 years after planting using the 1 m process while the 30 m process consistently had around 9 % detectability. We found correlation between soil types associated with frequent flooding and weaker detection of buffer tree cover. Median slope did not have a strong correlation with delineation accuracy but did influence the magnitude and timing of detectability. The delineation process utilized in this study and the identification of potential impact factors on accuracy and detectability will support efforts to delineate riparian buffer tree cover in other regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 107450"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying restored riparian buffer delineation accuracy and detectability in multitemporal imagery\",\"authors\":\"Ge Pu ,&nbsp;Lindi J. Quackenbush ,&nbsp;John C. Stella\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We used multitemporal imagery to map tree cover and quantify the accuracy and detectability of planted riparian buffers. We used data with two spatial resolutions and found that classification of 1 m National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery using a texture-based automatic delineation process matched visual interpretation in terms of both accuracy of tree cover mapping and detectability. In contrast, our method struggled to detect vegetation changes in the riparian buffers using moderate resolution 30 m Land Change Monitoring, Assessment, and Projection (LCMAP) data. Overall pixel-based map accuracy of buffer tree cover using the 1 m automatic process averaged 96 %, while the 30 m LCMAP-based maps had an average accuracy of 37 %. Using the 1 m NAIP imagery, we found on average it took 6 years for planted buffer trees to reach a 50 % detectability level, and 11 years to reach 100 % detectability. Detectability of riparian tree cover increased from 13 % to 98 % 11 years after planting using the 1 m process while the 30 m process consistently had around 9 % detectability. We found correlation between soil types associated with frequent flooding and weaker detection of buffer tree cover. Median slope did not have a strong correlation with delineation accuracy but did influence the magnitude and timing of detectability. The delineation process utilized in this study and the identification of potential impact factors on accuracy and detectability will support efforts to delineate riparian buffer tree cover in other regions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"210 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107450\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002751\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002751","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们使用多时图像绘制树木覆盖图,并量化已种植河岸缓冲区的准确性和可探测性。我们使用了两种空间分辨率的数据,发现使用基于纹理的自动划界程序对 1 米国家农业图像计划(NAIP)图像进行分类,在树木覆盖绘图的准确性和可探测性方面都与目测判读相匹配。相比之下,我们的方法在使用中等分辨率的 30 米土地变化监测、评估和预测(LCMAP)数据检测河岸缓冲区的植被变化时显得力不从心。使用 1 米自动处理技术绘制的缓冲区树木覆盖图的像素平均准确率为 96%,而使用 30 米 LCMAP 地图绘制的缓冲区树木覆盖图的平均准确率为 37%。通过使用 1 米 NAIP 图像,我们发现种植的缓冲区树木平均需要 6 年才能达到 50% 的可探测水平,而达到 100% 的可探测水平则需要 11 年。河岸树木覆盖率的可探测性在使用 1 m 流程种植 11 年后从 13% 提高到 98%,而 30 m 流程的可探测性一直保持在 9% 左右。我们发现,与洪水频发相关的土壤类型与缓冲区树木覆盖的检测能力较弱之间存在相关性。中位坡度与划界准确性的关系不大,但会影响可探测性的大小和时间。本研究采用的划界流程以及对准确性和可探测性潜在影响因素的识别,将有助于其他地区的河岸缓冲区树木覆盖划界工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying restored riparian buffer delineation accuracy and detectability in multitemporal imagery
We used multitemporal imagery to map tree cover and quantify the accuracy and detectability of planted riparian buffers. We used data with two spatial resolutions and found that classification of 1 m National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery using a texture-based automatic delineation process matched visual interpretation in terms of both accuracy of tree cover mapping and detectability. In contrast, our method struggled to detect vegetation changes in the riparian buffers using moderate resolution 30 m Land Change Monitoring, Assessment, and Projection (LCMAP) data. Overall pixel-based map accuracy of buffer tree cover using the 1 m automatic process averaged 96 %, while the 30 m LCMAP-based maps had an average accuracy of 37 %. Using the 1 m NAIP imagery, we found on average it took 6 years for planted buffer trees to reach a 50 % detectability level, and 11 years to reach 100 % detectability. Detectability of riparian tree cover increased from 13 % to 98 % 11 years after planting using the 1 m process while the 30 m process consistently had around 9 % detectability. We found correlation between soil types associated with frequent flooding and weaker detection of buffer tree cover. Median slope did not have a strong correlation with delineation accuracy but did influence the magnitude and timing of detectability. The delineation process utilized in this study and the identification of potential impact factors on accuracy and detectability will support efforts to delineate riparian buffer tree cover in other regions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信