{"title":"量化多时成像中已恢复河岸缓冲区划分的准确性和可探测性","authors":"Ge Pu , Lindi J. Quackenbush , John C. Stella","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We used multitemporal imagery to map tree cover and quantify the accuracy and detectability of planted riparian buffers. We used data with two spatial resolutions and found that classification of 1 m National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery using a texture-based automatic delineation process matched visual interpretation in terms of both accuracy of tree cover mapping and detectability. In contrast, our method struggled to detect vegetation changes in the riparian buffers using moderate resolution 30 m Land Change Monitoring, Assessment, and Projection (LCMAP) data. Overall pixel-based map accuracy of buffer tree cover using the 1 m automatic process averaged 96 %, while the 30 m LCMAP-based maps had an average accuracy of 37 %. Using the 1 m NAIP imagery, we found on average it took 6 years for planted buffer trees to reach a 50 % detectability level, and 11 years to reach 100 % detectability. Detectability of riparian tree cover increased from 13 % to 98 % 11 years after planting using the 1 m process while the 30 m process consistently had around 9 % detectability. We found correlation between soil types associated with frequent flooding and weaker detection of buffer tree cover. Median slope did not have a strong correlation with delineation accuracy but did influence the magnitude and timing of detectability. The delineation process utilized in this study and the identification of potential impact factors on accuracy and detectability will support efforts to delineate riparian buffer tree cover in other regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 107450"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying restored riparian buffer delineation accuracy and detectability in multitemporal imagery\",\"authors\":\"Ge Pu , Lindi J. Quackenbush , John C. Stella\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We used multitemporal imagery to map tree cover and quantify the accuracy and detectability of planted riparian buffers. We used data with two spatial resolutions and found that classification of 1 m National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery using a texture-based automatic delineation process matched visual interpretation in terms of both accuracy of tree cover mapping and detectability. In contrast, our method struggled to detect vegetation changes in the riparian buffers using moderate resolution 30 m Land Change Monitoring, Assessment, and Projection (LCMAP) data. Overall pixel-based map accuracy of buffer tree cover using the 1 m automatic process averaged 96 %, while the 30 m LCMAP-based maps had an average accuracy of 37 %. Using the 1 m NAIP imagery, we found on average it took 6 years for planted buffer trees to reach a 50 % detectability level, and 11 years to reach 100 % detectability. Detectability of riparian tree cover increased from 13 % to 98 % 11 years after planting using the 1 m process while the 30 m process consistently had around 9 % detectability. We found correlation between soil types associated with frequent flooding and weaker detection of buffer tree cover. Median slope did not have a strong correlation with delineation accuracy but did influence the magnitude and timing of detectability. The delineation process utilized in this study and the identification of potential impact factors on accuracy and detectability will support efforts to delineate riparian buffer tree cover in other regions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"210 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107450\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002751\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002751","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantifying restored riparian buffer delineation accuracy and detectability in multitemporal imagery
We used multitemporal imagery to map tree cover and quantify the accuracy and detectability of planted riparian buffers. We used data with two spatial resolutions and found that classification of 1 m National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery using a texture-based automatic delineation process matched visual interpretation in terms of both accuracy of tree cover mapping and detectability. In contrast, our method struggled to detect vegetation changes in the riparian buffers using moderate resolution 30 m Land Change Monitoring, Assessment, and Projection (LCMAP) data. Overall pixel-based map accuracy of buffer tree cover using the 1 m automatic process averaged 96 %, while the 30 m LCMAP-based maps had an average accuracy of 37 %. Using the 1 m NAIP imagery, we found on average it took 6 years for planted buffer trees to reach a 50 % detectability level, and 11 years to reach 100 % detectability. Detectability of riparian tree cover increased from 13 % to 98 % 11 years after planting using the 1 m process while the 30 m process consistently had around 9 % detectability. We found correlation between soil types associated with frequent flooding and weaker detection of buffer tree cover. Median slope did not have a strong correlation with delineation accuracy but did influence the magnitude and timing of detectability. The delineation process utilized in this study and the identification of potential impact factors on accuracy and detectability will support efforts to delineate riparian buffer tree cover in other regions.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.