"因素很多":研究人员对使用 I- 诗歌以感同身受的方式理解疫苗接种犹豫者的思考

Bryce Van Vleet M.S. , Heather R. Fuller Ph.D. , Andrea Huseth-Zosel Ph.D.
{"title":"\"因素很多\":研究人员对使用 I- 诗歌以感同身受的方式理解疫苗接种犹豫者的思考","authors":"Bryce Van Vleet M.S. ,&nbsp;Heather R. Fuller Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Andrea Huseth-Zosel Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.aggp.2024.100100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite higher vaccination rates compared to other age groups, many US older adults remain under-vaccinated against preventable diseases leading to increased risk of serious illness, hospitalization, or death posed from disease. This study investigates the underlying reasons for older adults not getting vaccinated.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From a larger interview study conducted in North Dakota, eight older adults (Mean Age = 73) were identified as being vaccine hesitant. Participants were asked, “How do you decide about whether or not to get a specific vaccine?” Then, participants' responses were analyzed using the I-poetry qualitative methodology, which involves creating a poem from interview transcripts to capture the essence of participants' experiences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Poetic findings clarify interacting sources of immunization unease and highlight potential intervention avenues for medical professionals. Specifically, the poetic analysis revealed themes of mistrust in the healthcare system, preference for natural immunity, and concerns about vaccine side effects. The study suggests that healthcare professionals should consider using empathetic communication strategies to address vaccine hesitancy in older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Understanding vaccine hesitancy as a tapestry instead of individual factors may be more useful for older adults who culminate their hesitant beliefs from prior life experiences. Additionally, to improve trust in healthcare providers, it is suggested that more first-person narratives of older adult experiences are used and solicited by healthcare providers. Possible interventions are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100119,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus","volume":"1 4","pages":"Article 100100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“There's a lot of factors”: Researcher reflections on using I-poetry to empathetically understand vaccine hesitant individuals\",\"authors\":\"Bryce Van Vleet M.S. ,&nbsp;Heather R. Fuller Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Andrea Huseth-Zosel Ph.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aggp.2024.100100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite higher vaccination rates compared to other age groups, many US older adults remain under-vaccinated against preventable diseases leading to increased risk of serious illness, hospitalization, or death posed from disease. This study investigates the underlying reasons for older adults not getting vaccinated.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From a larger interview study conducted in North Dakota, eight older adults (Mean Age = 73) were identified as being vaccine hesitant. Participants were asked, “How do you decide about whether or not to get a specific vaccine?” Then, participants' responses were analyzed using the I-poetry qualitative methodology, which involves creating a poem from interview transcripts to capture the essence of participants' experiences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Poetic findings clarify interacting sources of immunization unease and highlight potential intervention avenues for medical professionals. Specifically, the poetic analysis revealed themes of mistrust in the healthcare system, preference for natural immunity, and concerns about vaccine side effects. The study suggests that healthcare professionals should consider using empathetic communication strategies to address vaccine hesitancy in older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Understanding vaccine hesitancy as a tapestry instead of individual factors may be more useful for older adults who culminate their hesitant beliefs from prior life experiences. Additionally, to improve trust in healthcare providers, it is suggested that more first-person narratives of older adult experiences are used and solicited by healthcare providers. Possible interventions are discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus\",\"volume\":\"1 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950307824000973\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950307824000973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景尽管与其他年龄组相比,美国老年人的疫苗接种率较高,但许多老年人对可预防疾病的疫苗接种仍然不足,导致他们患重病、住院或因病死亡的风险增加。本研究调查了老年人不接种疫苗的根本原因。方法在北达科他州进行的一项规模较大的访谈研究中,8 名老年人(平均年龄 = 73 岁)被确认为疫苗接种犹豫不决者。参与者被问到:"您如何决定是否接种特定疫苗?然后,使用 I-poetry 定性分析方法对参与者的回答进行分析,该方法包括从访谈记录中创作一首诗,以捕捉参与者经历的精髓。结果诗歌研究结果澄清了免疫接种不安的互动来源,并强调了医疗专业人员的潜在干预途径。具体来说,诗歌分析揭示了对医疗系统的不信任、对自然免疫的偏好以及对疫苗副作用的担忧等主题。研究表明,医疗保健专业人员应考虑使用移情沟通策略来解决老年人的疫苗犹豫不决问题。结论将疫苗犹豫不决理解为一种织锦,而不是个别因素,可能对那些从以前的生活经历中总结出犹豫信念的老年人更有用。此外,为了提高对医疗服务提供者的信任,建议医疗服务提供者使用和征求更多老年人的第一人称叙述。本文还讨论了可能的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“There's a lot of factors”: Researcher reflections on using I-poetry to empathetically understand vaccine hesitant individuals

Background

Despite higher vaccination rates compared to other age groups, many US older adults remain under-vaccinated against preventable diseases leading to increased risk of serious illness, hospitalization, or death posed from disease. This study investigates the underlying reasons for older adults not getting vaccinated.

Methods

From a larger interview study conducted in North Dakota, eight older adults (Mean Age = 73) were identified as being vaccine hesitant. Participants were asked, “How do you decide about whether or not to get a specific vaccine?” Then, participants' responses were analyzed using the I-poetry qualitative methodology, which involves creating a poem from interview transcripts to capture the essence of participants' experiences.

Results

Poetic findings clarify interacting sources of immunization unease and highlight potential intervention avenues for medical professionals. Specifically, the poetic analysis revealed themes of mistrust in the healthcare system, preference for natural immunity, and concerns about vaccine side effects. The study suggests that healthcare professionals should consider using empathetic communication strategies to address vaccine hesitancy in older adults.

Conclusions

Understanding vaccine hesitancy as a tapestry instead of individual factors may be more useful for older adults who culminate their hesitant beliefs from prior life experiences. Additionally, to improve trust in healthcare providers, it is suggested that more first-person narratives of older adult experiences are used and solicited by healthcare providers. Possible interventions are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信