推进能源转型中的技术评估:半系统文献综述

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
J.K. Musango
{"title":"推进能源转型中的技术评估:半系统文献综述","authors":"J.K. Musango","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Technology assessment is evolving and becoming more relevant in evaluating energy transitions. Climate change, energy security, energy justice and sustainability challenges dominate energy transition debates. As technology continues to advance, improving methods to assess energy transitions is crucial. However, limited studies explore assessment methods applicable to energy transitions. This study reviews the literature on energy technology assessment using a semi-systematic review, to understand the state of technology assessment methods and identify areas for improving the assessment practices. The study organised the review into five themes: characteristics of technology assessments, energy transition technologies assessed, the purpose of assessment, methods and tools applied, and emerging issues and their implications. The results revealed that conventional technology assessment methods still dominate in the literature. At the same time, six assessment methods are emerging. These are technology acceptance analysis, hybrid analysis, institutional analysis, visioning analysis, integrated assessment and ethical analysis. The study posits three areas for improvement. First, technology assessment can advance transdisciplinary practice and theory. Second, it can develop comprehensive assessments. Third, it can foster sustainability as a foundation for assessing energy transitions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 115060"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing technology assessment in energy transitions: A semi-systematic literature review\",\"authors\":\"J.K. Musango\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Technology assessment is evolving and becoming more relevant in evaluating energy transitions. Climate change, energy security, energy justice and sustainability challenges dominate energy transition debates. As technology continues to advance, improving methods to assess energy transitions is crucial. However, limited studies explore assessment methods applicable to energy transitions. This study reviews the literature on energy technology assessment using a semi-systematic review, to understand the state of technology assessment methods and identify areas for improving the assessment practices. The study organised the review into five themes: characteristics of technology assessments, energy transition technologies assessed, the purpose of assessment, methods and tools applied, and emerging issues and their implications. The results revealed that conventional technology assessment methods still dominate in the literature. At the same time, six assessment methods are emerging. These are technology acceptance analysis, hybrid analysis, institutional analysis, visioning analysis, integrated assessment and ethical analysis. The study posits three areas for improvement. First, technology assessment can advance transdisciplinary practice and theory. Second, it can develop comprehensive assessments. Third, it can foster sustainability as a foundation for assessing energy transitions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"208 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115060\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403212400786X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403212400786X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

技术评估在评估能源转型方面不断发展,并变得越来越重要。气候变化、能源安全、能源公正和可持续性挑战主导着能源转型辩论。随着技术的不断进步,改进能源转型评估方法至关重要。然而,探索适用于能源转型的评估方法的研究还很有限。本研究采用半系统回顾的方式,对能源技术评估方面的文献进行了回顾,以了解技术评估方法的现状,并确定改进评估实践的领域。研究将综述分为五个主题:技术评估的特点、评估的能源转型技术、评估的目的、应用的方法和工具以及新出现的问题及其影响。研究结果显示,传统技术评估方法在文献中仍占主导地位。与此同时,六种评估方法正在兴起。它们是技术接受度分析、混合分析、机构分析、愿景分析、综合评估和伦理分析。研究提出了三个需要改进的方面。首先,技术评估可以推动跨学科实践和理论的发展。第二,技术评估可以发展综合评估。第三,技术评估可以促进可持续性,将其作为评估能源转型的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Advancing technology assessment in energy transitions: A semi-systematic literature review

Advancing technology assessment in energy transitions: A semi-systematic literature review
Technology assessment is evolving and becoming more relevant in evaluating energy transitions. Climate change, energy security, energy justice and sustainability challenges dominate energy transition debates. As technology continues to advance, improving methods to assess energy transitions is crucial. However, limited studies explore assessment methods applicable to energy transitions. This study reviews the literature on energy technology assessment using a semi-systematic review, to understand the state of technology assessment methods and identify areas for improving the assessment practices. The study organised the review into five themes: characteristics of technology assessments, energy transition technologies assessed, the purpose of assessment, methods and tools applied, and emerging issues and their implications. The results revealed that conventional technology assessment methods still dominate in the literature. At the same time, six assessment methods are emerging. These are technology acceptance analysis, hybrid analysis, institutional analysis, visioning analysis, integrated assessment and ethical analysis. The study posits three areas for improvement. First, technology assessment can advance transdisciplinary practice and theory. Second, it can develop comprehensive assessments. Third, it can foster sustainability as a foundation for assessing energy transitions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信