Ignacio Pedrinaci, Betty Ben Dor, Dominique Rousson, Alejandro Lanis, Javier Sanz-Esporrin, Kevser Pala, German O Gallucci, Adam Hamilton
{"title":"计算机辅助种植手术中的过渡种植体和固定式全牙弓临时定位:回顾性病例系列。","authors":"Ignacio Pedrinaci, Betty Ben Dor, Dominique Rousson, Alejandro Lanis, Javier Sanz-Esporrin, Kevser Pala, German O Gallucci, Adam Hamilton","doi":"10.1111/cid.13396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Using mini implants as transitional implants (TIs) for complete arch implant-supported rehabilitations may overcome limitations associated with mucosa-supported surgical guides and facilitate immediate fixed provisionalization. This study aimed to assess the success of TIs in supporting surgical guides for implant placement and fixed provisional prostheses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who received TIs between 2012 and 2023 for a complete arch implant-supported prosthesis were evaluated retrospectively. Patient demographic data, TI functionality in supporting a surgical guide and supporting a complete arch provisional prosthesis, and dates of TI placement and regular implant placement were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the survival rate and success rate for TIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six patients, 35 jaws, 136 TIs, and 216 regular implants were included. The survival rate of TIs was 74.26%; however, the use of TIs yielded success in 97% of jaws for supporting a surgical guide and a fixed complete-arch provisional prosthesis throughout the complete provisional phase. An average of 4 TIs per maxilla and 3 TIs per mandible supported surgical guides. Thirty-five provisional prostheses were placed on an average of 4 TIs in the maxilla and 3 TIs in the mandible. Thirty-four provisional prostheses were successfully supported by TIs and regular implants until final restoration delivery. The survival of regular implants placed in conjunction with the use of TIs was 98%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using TIs to support a surgical guide and provisional prosthesis may be a predictable approach with a high success rate. All surgical guides planned to be supported on TIs were successful. Despite premature loss or replacement of TIs, this approach was able to support most provisional prostheses until the regular implants could be loaded.</p>","PeriodicalId":93944,"journal":{"name":"Clinical implant dentistry and related research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transitional implants in computer-assisted implant surgery and fixed complete-arch provisionalization: A retrospective case series.\",\"authors\":\"Ignacio Pedrinaci, Betty Ben Dor, Dominique Rousson, Alejandro Lanis, Javier Sanz-Esporrin, Kevser Pala, German O Gallucci, Adam Hamilton\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cid.13396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Using mini implants as transitional implants (TIs) for complete arch implant-supported rehabilitations may overcome limitations associated with mucosa-supported surgical guides and facilitate immediate fixed provisionalization. This study aimed to assess the success of TIs in supporting surgical guides for implant placement and fixed provisional prostheses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who received TIs between 2012 and 2023 for a complete arch implant-supported prosthesis were evaluated retrospectively. Patient demographic data, TI functionality in supporting a surgical guide and supporting a complete arch provisional prosthesis, and dates of TI placement and regular implant placement were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the survival rate and success rate for TIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six patients, 35 jaws, 136 TIs, and 216 regular implants were included. The survival rate of TIs was 74.26%; however, the use of TIs yielded success in 97% of jaws for supporting a surgical guide and a fixed complete-arch provisional prosthesis throughout the complete provisional phase. An average of 4 TIs per maxilla and 3 TIs per mandible supported surgical guides. Thirty-five provisional prostheses were placed on an average of 4 TIs in the maxilla and 3 TIs in the mandible. Thirty-four provisional prostheses were successfully supported by TIs and regular implants until final restoration delivery. The survival of regular implants placed in conjunction with the use of TIs was 98%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using TIs to support a surgical guide and provisional prosthesis may be a predictable approach with a high success rate. All surgical guides planned to be supported on TIs were successful. Despite premature loss or replacement of TIs, this approach was able to support most provisional prostheses until the regular implants could be loaded.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical implant dentistry and related research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical implant dentistry and related research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13396\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical implant dentistry and related research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:使用微型种植体作为过渡性种植体(TI)进行全弓种植体支持修复,可以克服粘膜支持手术导板的局限性,并促进即刻固定临时修复。本研究旨在评估TI在支持种植体植入手术导板和固定临时修复体方面的成功率:方法: 对2012年至2023年期间接受TI进行全弓种植义齿修复的患者进行回顾性评估。收集了患者的人口统计学数据、TI在支持手术导板和支持全弓临时修复体方面的功能、TI植入日期和常规种植体植入日期。描述性统计用于确定TI的存活率和成功率:共纳入 26 名患者、35 个颌骨、136 个 TI 和 216 个常规种植体。TIs的存活率为74.26%;然而,在整个临时阶段,97%的颌骨使用TIs成功地支撑了手术导板和固定全拱临时假体。平均每个上颌有 4 个 TI,每个下颌有 3 个 TI 支持手术导板。平均每个上颌骨有4个TI,下颌骨有3个TI,共安装了35颗临时义齿。34颗临时义齿成功地得到了TI和常规种植体的支持,直至最终修复体植入。在使用TI的同时植入的常规种植体的存活率为98%:结论:使用 TI 支持手术导板和临时修复体可能是一种成功率较高的可预测方法。所有计划用TI支撑的手术导板都获得了成功。尽管TI过早丢失或更换,但这种方法仍能支持大多数临时假体,直到常规种植体可以装入。
Transitional implants in computer-assisted implant surgery and fixed complete-arch provisionalization: A retrospective case series.
Introduction: Using mini implants as transitional implants (TIs) for complete arch implant-supported rehabilitations may overcome limitations associated with mucosa-supported surgical guides and facilitate immediate fixed provisionalization. This study aimed to assess the success of TIs in supporting surgical guides for implant placement and fixed provisional prostheses.
Methods: Patients who received TIs between 2012 and 2023 for a complete arch implant-supported prosthesis were evaluated retrospectively. Patient demographic data, TI functionality in supporting a surgical guide and supporting a complete arch provisional prosthesis, and dates of TI placement and regular implant placement were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the survival rate and success rate for TIs.
Results: Twenty-six patients, 35 jaws, 136 TIs, and 216 regular implants were included. The survival rate of TIs was 74.26%; however, the use of TIs yielded success in 97% of jaws for supporting a surgical guide and a fixed complete-arch provisional prosthesis throughout the complete provisional phase. An average of 4 TIs per maxilla and 3 TIs per mandible supported surgical guides. Thirty-five provisional prostheses were placed on an average of 4 TIs in the maxilla and 3 TIs in the mandible. Thirty-four provisional prostheses were successfully supported by TIs and regular implants until final restoration delivery. The survival of regular implants placed in conjunction with the use of TIs was 98%.
Conclusions: Using TIs to support a surgical guide and provisional prosthesis may be a predictable approach with a high success rate. All surgical guides planned to be supported on TIs were successful. Despite premature loss or replacement of TIs, this approach was able to support most provisional prostheses until the regular implants could be loaded.