颈部膈神经电刺激的激活阈值:模拟研究中刺激脉冲参数的评估。

Laureen Wegert, Marek Ziolkowski, Tim Kalla, Irene Lange, Jens Haueisen, Alexander Hunold
{"title":"颈部膈神经电刺激的激活阈值:模拟研究中刺激脉冲参数的评估。","authors":"Laureen Wegert, Marek Ziolkowski, Tim Kalla, Irene Lange, Jens Haueisen, Alexander Hunold","doi":"10.1088/1741-2552/ad8c84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Phrenic nerve stimulation reduces ventilator-induced-diaphragmatic-dysfunction, which is a potential complication of mechanical ventilation. Electromagnetic simulations provide valuable information about the effects of the stimulation and are used to determine appropriate stimulation parameters and evaluate possible co-activation.<i>Approach.</i>Using a multiscale approach, we built a novel detailed anatomical model of the neck and the phrenic nerve. The model consisted of a macroscale volume conduction model of the neck with 13 tissues, a mesoscale volume conduction model of the phrenic nerve with three tissues, and a microscale biophysiological model of axons with diameters ranging from 5 to 14 <i>µ</i>m based on the McIntyre-Richardson-Grill-model for myelinated axons. This multiscale model was used to quantify activation thresholds of phrenic nerve fibers using different stimulation pulse parameters (pulse width, interphase delay, asymmetry of biphasic pulses, pulse polarity, and rise time) during non-invasive electrical stimulation. Electric field strength was used to evaluate co-activation of the other nerves in the neck.<i>Main results.</i>For monophasic pulses with a pulse width of 150 <i>µ</i>s, the activation threshold depended on the fiber diameter and ranged from 20 to 156 mA, with highest activation threshold for the smallest fiber diameter. The relationship was approximated using a power fit function<i>x</i><sup>-3</sup>. Biphasic (symmetric) pulses increased the activation threshold by 25 to 30 %. The use of asymmetric biphasic pulses or an interphase delay lowered the threshold close to the monophasic threshold. Possible co-activated nerves were the more superficial nerves and included the transverse cervical nerve, the supraclavicular nerve, the great auricular nerve, the cervical plexus, the brachial plexus, and the long thoracic nerve.<i>Significance.</i>Our multiscale model and electromagnetic simulations provided insight into phrenic nerve activation and possible co-activation by non-invasive electrical stimulation and provided guidance on the use of stimulation pulse types with minimal activation threshold.</p>","PeriodicalId":94096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neural engineering","volume":"21 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Activation thresholds for electrical phrenic nerve stimulation at the neck: evaluation of stimulation pulse parameters in a simulation study.\",\"authors\":\"Laureen Wegert, Marek Ziolkowski, Tim Kalla, Irene Lange, Jens Haueisen, Alexander Hunold\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1741-2552/ad8c84\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Phrenic nerve stimulation reduces ventilator-induced-diaphragmatic-dysfunction, which is a potential complication of mechanical ventilation. Electromagnetic simulations provide valuable information about the effects of the stimulation and are used to determine appropriate stimulation parameters and evaluate possible co-activation.<i>Approach.</i>Using a multiscale approach, we built a novel detailed anatomical model of the neck and the phrenic nerve. The model consisted of a macroscale volume conduction model of the neck with 13 tissues, a mesoscale volume conduction model of the phrenic nerve with three tissues, and a microscale biophysiological model of axons with diameters ranging from 5 to 14 <i>µ</i>m based on the McIntyre-Richardson-Grill-model for myelinated axons. This multiscale model was used to quantify activation thresholds of phrenic nerve fibers using different stimulation pulse parameters (pulse width, interphase delay, asymmetry of biphasic pulses, pulse polarity, and rise time) during non-invasive electrical stimulation. Electric field strength was used to evaluate co-activation of the other nerves in the neck.<i>Main results.</i>For monophasic pulses with a pulse width of 150 <i>µ</i>s, the activation threshold depended on the fiber diameter and ranged from 20 to 156 mA, with highest activation threshold for the smallest fiber diameter. The relationship was approximated using a power fit function<i>x</i><sup>-3</sup>. Biphasic (symmetric) pulses increased the activation threshold by 25 to 30 %. The use of asymmetric biphasic pulses or an interphase delay lowered the threshold close to the monophasic threshold. Possible co-activated nerves were the more superficial nerves and included the transverse cervical nerve, the supraclavicular nerve, the great auricular nerve, the cervical plexus, the brachial plexus, and the long thoracic nerve.<i>Significance.</i>Our multiscale model and electromagnetic simulations provided insight into phrenic nerve activation and possible co-activation by non-invasive electrical stimulation and provided guidance on the use of stimulation pulse types with minimal activation threshold.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neural engineering\",\"volume\":\"21 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neural engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ad8c84\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neural engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ad8c84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:膈神经刺激可减少呼吸机诱发的膈肌功能障碍,这是机械通气的潜在并发症。电磁模拟可提供有关刺激效果的宝贵信息,并用于确定适当的刺激参数和评估可能的共同激活。方法:我们采用多尺度方法,建立了一个新颖、详细的颈部和膈神经解剖模型。该模型包括一个包含 13 个组织的宏观尺度颈部容积传导模型、一个包含 3 个组织的中观尺度膈神经容积传导模型,以及一个基于麦金太尔-理查森-格里尔髓鞘轴突模型的微观尺度轴突生物生理学模型,轴突直径从 5 微米到 14 微米不等。该多尺度模型用于量化膈神经纤维在无创电刺激过程中使用不同刺激脉冲参数(脉冲宽度、相间延迟、双相脉冲的不对称性、脉冲极性和上升时间)时的激活阈值。主要结果:对于脉冲宽度为 150 µs 的单相脉冲,激活阈值取决于纤维直径,范围在 20 至 156 mA 之间,最小纤维直径的激活阈值最高。该关系用幂拟合函数 x-3 逼近。双相(对称)脉冲可将激活阈值提高 25%至 30%。使用不对称双相脉冲或相间延迟可降低阈值,使其接近单相阈值。可能共同激活的神经是较表浅的神经,包括颈横神经、锁骨上神经、大耳神经、颈丛神经、臂丛神经和胸长神经。我们的多尺度模型和电磁模拟深入了解了非侵入性电刺激对膈神经的激活和可能的共同激活,并为使用激活阈值最小的刺激脉冲类型提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Activation thresholds for electrical phrenic nerve stimulation at the neck: evaluation of stimulation pulse parameters in a simulation study.

Objective.Phrenic nerve stimulation reduces ventilator-induced-diaphragmatic-dysfunction, which is a potential complication of mechanical ventilation. Electromagnetic simulations provide valuable information about the effects of the stimulation and are used to determine appropriate stimulation parameters and evaluate possible co-activation.Approach.Using a multiscale approach, we built a novel detailed anatomical model of the neck and the phrenic nerve. The model consisted of a macroscale volume conduction model of the neck with 13 tissues, a mesoscale volume conduction model of the phrenic nerve with three tissues, and a microscale biophysiological model of axons with diameters ranging from 5 to 14 µm based on the McIntyre-Richardson-Grill-model for myelinated axons. This multiscale model was used to quantify activation thresholds of phrenic nerve fibers using different stimulation pulse parameters (pulse width, interphase delay, asymmetry of biphasic pulses, pulse polarity, and rise time) during non-invasive electrical stimulation. Electric field strength was used to evaluate co-activation of the other nerves in the neck.Main results.For monophasic pulses with a pulse width of 150 µs, the activation threshold depended on the fiber diameter and ranged from 20 to 156 mA, with highest activation threshold for the smallest fiber diameter. The relationship was approximated using a power fit functionx-3. Biphasic (symmetric) pulses increased the activation threshold by 25 to 30 %. The use of asymmetric biphasic pulses or an interphase delay lowered the threshold close to the monophasic threshold. Possible co-activated nerves were the more superficial nerves and included the transverse cervical nerve, the supraclavicular nerve, the great auricular nerve, the cervical plexus, the brachial plexus, and the long thoracic nerve.Significance.Our multiscale model and electromagnetic simulations provided insight into phrenic nerve activation and possible co-activation by non-invasive electrical stimulation and provided guidance on the use of stimulation pulse types with minimal activation threshold.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信