定义或不定义：对 "元认知反思案例 "的评论。

IF 3 2区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Advances in Health Sciences Education Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1007/s10459-024-10391-7

Rachel H Ellaway, Catherine Patocka

{"title":"定义或不定义：对 \"元认知反思案例 \"的评论。","authors":"Rachel H Ellaway, Catherine Patocka","doi":"10.1007/s10459-024-10391-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this commentary, the authors comment on a recent paper that argued for clear definitions of metacognition, reflection, and metacognitive reflection. Challenging the notion that exclusive definitions are essential to the sciences of health professions education, the authors argue for approaches that define conceptual spaces in which different definitional positions can coexist and scholarship based on similarity rather than identity can be pursued.","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To define or not to define: a commentary on 'The case for metacognitive reflection'.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel H Ellaway, Catherine Patocka\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10459-024-10391-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this commentary, the authors comment on a recent paper that argued for clear definitions of metacognition, reflection, and metacognitive reflection. Challenging the notion that exclusive definitions are essential to the sciences of health professions education, the authors argue for approaches that define conceptual spaces in which different definitional positions can coexist and scholarship based on similarity rather than identity can be pursued.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Health Sciences Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Health Sciences Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10391-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10391-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇评论中，作者对最近的一篇论文进行了评论，该论文主张对元认知、反思和元认知反思进行明确定义。作者对排他性定义对于健康专业教育科学至关重要的观点提出了质疑，并主张采用定义概念空间的方法，在这些概念空间中，不同的定义立场可以共存，并可以在相似性而非同一性的基础上开展学术研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

To define or not to define: a commentary on 'The case for metacognitive reflection'.

In this commentary, the authors comment on a recent paper that argued for clear definitions of metacognition, reflection, and metacognitive reflection. Challenging the notion that exclusive definitions are essential to the sciences of health professions education, the authors argue for approaches that define conceptual spaces in which different definitional positions can coexist and scholarship based on similarity rather than identity can be pursued.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Advances in Health Sciences Education 医学-卫生保健

CiteScore

6.90

自引率

12.50%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.