在急性心肌梗死中常规使用螺内酯。

IF 96.2 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sanjit S Jolly, Marc-André d'Entremont, Bertram Pitt, Shun Fu Lee, Rajibul Mian, Jessica Tyrwhitt, Sasko Kedev, Gilles Montalescot, Jan H Cornel, Goran Stanković, Raul Moreno, Robert F Storey, Timothy D Henry, Shamir R Mehta, Matthias Bossard, Petr Kala, Ravinay Bhindi, Biljana Zafirovska, P J Devereaux, John Eikelboom, John A Cairns, Madhu K Natarajan, J D Schwalm, Sanjib K Sharma, Wadea Tarhuni, David Conen, Sarah Tawadros, Shahar Lavi, Valon Asani, Dragan Topic, Warren J Cantor, Olivier F Bertrand, Ali Pourdjabbar, Salim Yusuf
{"title":"在急性心肌梗死中常规使用螺内酯。","authors":"Sanjit S Jolly, Marc-André d'Entremont, Bertram Pitt, Shun Fu Lee, Rajibul Mian, Jessica Tyrwhitt, Sasko Kedev, Gilles Montalescot, Jan H Cornel, Goran Stanković, Raul Moreno, Robert F Storey, Timothy D Henry, Shamir R Mehta, Matthias Bossard, Petr Kala, Ravinay Bhindi, Biljana Zafirovska, P J Devereaux, John Eikelboom, John A Cairns, Madhu K Natarajan, J D Schwalm, Sanjib K Sharma, Wadea Tarhuni, David Conen, Sarah Tawadros, Shahar Lavi, Valon Asani, Dragan Topic, Warren J Cantor, Olivier F Bertrand, Ali Pourdjabbar, Salim Yusuf","doi":"10.1056/NEJMoa2405923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists have been shown to reduce mortality in patients after myocardial infarction with congestive heart failure. Whether routine use of spironolactone is beneficial after myocardial infarction is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design, we randomly assigned patients with myocardial infarction who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention to receive either spironolactone or placebo and either colchicine or placebo. The results of the spironolactone trial are reported here. The two primary outcomes were a composite of death from cardiovascular causes or new or worsening heart failure, evaluated as the total number of events; and a composite of the first occurrence of myocardial infarction, stroke, new or worsening heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes. Safety was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 7062 patients at 104 centers in 14 countries; 3537 patients were assigned to receive spironolactone and 3525 to receive placebo. At the time of our analyses, the vital status was unknown for 45 patients (0.6%). For the first primary outcome, there were 183 events (1.7 per 100 patient-years) in the spironolactone group as compared with 220 events (2.1 per 100 patient-years) in the placebo group over a median follow-up period of 3 years (hazard ratio adjusted for competing risk of death from noncardiovascular causes, 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 1.21; P = 0.51). With respect to the second primary outcome, an event occurred in 280 of 3537 patients (7.9%) in the spironolactone group and 294 of 3525 patients (8.3%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio adjusted for competing risk, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.13; P = 0.60). Serious adverse events were reported in 255 patients (7.2%) in the spironolactone group and 241 (6.8%) in the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with myocardial infarction, spironolactone did not reduce the incidence of death from cardiovascular causes or new or worsening heart failure or the incidence of a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new or worsening heart failure. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; CLEAR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03048825.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":96.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Routine Spironolactone in Acute Myocardial Infarction.\",\"authors\":\"Sanjit S Jolly, Marc-André d'Entremont, Bertram Pitt, Shun Fu Lee, Rajibul Mian, Jessica Tyrwhitt, Sasko Kedev, Gilles Montalescot, Jan H Cornel, Goran Stanković, Raul Moreno, Robert F Storey, Timothy D Henry, Shamir R Mehta, Matthias Bossard, Petr Kala, Ravinay Bhindi, Biljana Zafirovska, P J Devereaux, John Eikelboom, John A Cairns, Madhu K Natarajan, J D Schwalm, Sanjib K Sharma, Wadea Tarhuni, David Conen, Sarah Tawadros, Shahar Lavi, Valon Asani, Dragan Topic, Warren J Cantor, Olivier F Bertrand, Ali Pourdjabbar, Salim Yusuf\",\"doi\":\"10.1056/NEJMoa2405923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists have been shown to reduce mortality in patients after myocardial infarction with congestive heart failure. Whether routine use of spironolactone is beneficial after myocardial infarction is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design, we randomly assigned patients with myocardial infarction who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention to receive either spironolactone or placebo and either colchicine or placebo. The results of the spironolactone trial are reported here. The two primary outcomes were a composite of death from cardiovascular causes or new or worsening heart failure, evaluated as the total number of events; and a composite of the first occurrence of myocardial infarction, stroke, new or worsening heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes. Safety was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 7062 patients at 104 centers in 14 countries; 3537 patients were assigned to receive spironolactone and 3525 to receive placebo. At the time of our analyses, the vital status was unknown for 45 patients (0.6%). For the first primary outcome, there were 183 events (1.7 per 100 patient-years) in the spironolactone group as compared with 220 events (2.1 per 100 patient-years) in the placebo group over a median follow-up period of 3 years (hazard ratio adjusted for competing risk of death from noncardiovascular causes, 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 1.21; P = 0.51). With respect to the second primary outcome, an event occurred in 280 of 3537 patients (7.9%) in the spironolactone group and 294 of 3525 patients (8.3%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio adjusted for competing risk, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.13; P = 0.60). Serious adverse events were reported in 255 patients (7.2%) in the spironolactone group and 241 (6.8%) in the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with myocardial infarction, spironolactone did not reduce the incidence of death from cardiovascular causes or new or worsening heart failure or the incidence of a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new or worsening heart failure. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; CLEAR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03048825.).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New England Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":96.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New England Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2405923\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New England Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2405923","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究表明,矿物质皮质激素受体拮抗剂可降低心肌梗死合并充血性心力衰竭患者的死亡率。心肌梗死后常规使用螺内酯是否有益尚不确定:在这项采用 2×2 因子设计的多中心试验中,我们随机分配接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心肌梗死患者接受螺内酯或安慰剂以及秋水仙碱或安慰剂治疗。本文报告了螺内酯试验的结果。两个主要结果是心血管原因导致的死亡或新发或恶化的心力衰竭的复合结果(以事件总数评估),以及首次发生心肌梗死、中风、新发或恶化的心力衰竭或心血管原因导致的死亡的复合结果。此外,还对安全性进行了评估:我们在 14 个国家的 104 个中心招募了 7062 名患者,其中 3537 名患者被分配接受螺内酯治疗,3525 名患者被分配接受安慰剂治疗。在我们进行分析时,有 45 名患者(0.6%)的生命体征状况不明。就第一项主要结果而言,在中位随访 3 年期间,螺内酯组发生了 183 例事件(每 100 患者年 1.7 例),而安慰剂组发生了 220 例事件(每 100 患者年 2.1 例)(根据非心血管原因导致死亡的竞争风险调整后的危险比为 0.91;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.69 至 1.21;P = 0.51)。关于第二项主要结果,螺内酯组 3537 例患者中有 280 例(7.9%)发生了事件,安慰剂组 3525 例患者中有 294 例(8.3%)发生了事件(调整竞争风险后的危险比为 0.96;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.81 至 1.13;P = 0.60)。螺内酯组有255名患者(7.2%)发生严重不良事件,安慰剂组有241名患者(6.8%)发生严重不良事件:结论:在心肌梗死患者中,螺内酯并未降低心血管原因死亡或新发或恶化的心力衰竭的发生率,也未降低心血管原因死亡、心肌梗死、中风或新发或恶化的心力衰竭的复合发生率。(由加拿大健康研究所等机构资助;CLEAR ClinicalTrials.gov 编号:NCT03048825)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Routine Spironolactone in Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Background: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists have been shown to reduce mortality in patients after myocardial infarction with congestive heart failure. Whether routine use of spironolactone is beneficial after myocardial infarction is uncertain.

Methods: In this multicenter trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design, we randomly assigned patients with myocardial infarction who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention to receive either spironolactone or placebo and either colchicine or placebo. The results of the spironolactone trial are reported here. The two primary outcomes were a composite of death from cardiovascular causes or new or worsening heart failure, evaluated as the total number of events; and a composite of the first occurrence of myocardial infarction, stroke, new or worsening heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes. Safety was also assessed.

Results: We enrolled 7062 patients at 104 centers in 14 countries; 3537 patients were assigned to receive spironolactone and 3525 to receive placebo. At the time of our analyses, the vital status was unknown for 45 patients (0.6%). For the first primary outcome, there were 183 events (1.7 per 100 patient-years) in the spironolactone group as compared with 220 events (2.1 per 100 patient-years) in the placebo group over a median follow-up period of 3 years (hazard ratio adjusted for competing risk of death from noncardiovascular causes, 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 1.21; P = 0.51). With respect to the second primary outcome, an event occurred in 280 of 3537 patients (7.9%) in the spironolactone group and 294 of 3525 patients (8.3%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio adjusted for competing risk, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.13; P = 0.60). Serious adverse events were reported in 255 patients (7.2%) in the spironolactone group and 241 (6.8%) in the placebo group.

Conclusions: Among patients with myocardial infarction, spironolactone did not reduce the incidence of death from cardiovascular causes or new or worsening heart failure or the incidence of a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new or worsening heart failure. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; CLEAR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03048825.).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New England Journal of Medicine
New England Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
145.40
自引率
0.60%
发文量
1839
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) stands as the foremost medical journal and website worldwide. With an impressive history spanning over two centuries, NEJM boasts a consistent publication of superb, peer-reviewed research and engaging clinical content. Our primary objective revolves around delivering high-caliber information and findings at the juncture of biomedical science and clinical practice. We strive to present this knowledge in formats that are not only comprehensible but also hold practical value, effectively influencing healthcare practices and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信