评估索非布韦对 COVID-19 门诊患者的治疗效果:随机临床试验研究。

IF 0.5 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Galen Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-02-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.31661/gmj.v12i.3035
Maryam Haddadzadeh Shoushtari, Hanieh Raji, Seyed Hamid Borsi, Heshmatollah Tavakol, Bahman Cheraghian, Mahtab Moeinpour
{"title":"评估索非布韦对 COVID-19 门诊患者的治疗效果:随机临床试验研究。","authors":"Maryam Haddadzadeh Shoushtari, Hanieh Raji, Seyed Hamid Borsi, Heshmatollah Tavakol, Bahman Cheraghian, Mahtab Moeinpour","doi":"10.31661/gmj.v12i.3035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has engendered scores of deaths worldwide. Just as the development of varying procedures during the pandemic has helped inhibit the disease, none is considered a definitive treatment protocol for this problem, as each induces some clinical complications pertinent to the disease. This study thus assessed the early use of sofosbuvir in outpatients with mild COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial study was conducted on 360 patients with mild COVID-19 infection at 17 Shahrivar Ahvaz Health Center. These patients were randomly divided into the intervention and control groups. Both the control and intervention groups received 400 mg of sofosbuvir and a placebo for seven days, respectively. After 14 days from the onset of the treatment, the duration of symptoms, the necessity of hospitalization, the mean of hospitalization duration, and mortality were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common symptoms in the intervention and control groups were coughs with a frequency of 46 (25.6%) and 54(30%), respectively. The two groups showed no statistically significant difference in the frequency of the first observed clinical symptom related to the disease (P=0.2). The mean days that the patients were symptomatic in the control group were 14±4.17, whereas, in the intervention group, it was 12.12±3.15 (P=0.08). The frequency of hospitalization in the control and intervention groups was 7 (3.8%) and 4 (2.22%), respectively (P=0.11). Moreover, the mean days of hospitalization in the control and the intervention groups were 4±1.1 and 3±0.8, respectively (P=0.15). In addition, the two groups had a similar frequency of hospitalization in the ICU (0) and mortality rate (0).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sofosbuvir alone cannot play a significant role in the treatment of outpatients with mild COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":44017,"journal":{"name":"Galen Medical Journal","volume":"13 ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568422/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Therapeutic Effect of Sofosbuvir in Outpatients with COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study.\",\"authors\":\"Maryam Haddadzadeh Shoushtari, Hanieh Raji, Seyed Hamid Borsi, Heshmatollah Tavakol, Bahman Cheraghian, Mahtab Moeinpour\",\"doi\":\"10.31661/gmj.v12i.3035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has engendered scores of deaths worldwide. Just as the development of varying procedures during the pandemic has helped inhibit the disease, none is considered a definitive treatment protocol for this problem, as each induces some clinical complications pertinent to the disease. This study thus assessed the early use of sofosbuvir in outpatients with mild COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial study was conducted on 360 patients with mild COVID-19 infection at 17 Shahrivar Ahvaz Health Center. These patients were randomly divided into the intervention and control groups. Both the control and intervention groups received 400 mg of sofosbuvir and a placebo for seven days, respectively. After 14 days from the onset of the treatment, the duration of symptoms, the necessity of hospitalization, the mean of hospitalization duration, and mortality were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common symptoms in the intervention and control groups were coughs with a frequency of 46 (25.6%) and 54(30%), respectively. The two groups showed no statistically significant difference in the frequency of the first observed clinical symptom related to the disease (P=0.2). The mean days that the patients were symptomatic in the control group were 14±4.17, whereas, in the intervention group, it was 12.12±3.15 (P=0.08). The frequency of hospitalization in the control and intervention groups was 7 (3.8%) and 4 (2.22%), respectively (P=0.11). Moreover, the mean days of hospitalization in the control and the intervention groups were 4±1.1 and 3±0.8, respectively (P=0.15). In addition, the two groups had a similar frequency of hospitalization in the ICU (0) and mortality rate (0).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sofosbuvir alone cannot play a significant role in the treatment of outpatients with mild COVID-19.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Galen Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568422/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Galen Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v12i.3035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Galen Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v12i.3035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)大流行已在全球造成数十人死亡。正如大流行期间开发的各种程序有助于抑制该疾病一样,没有一种程序被认为是该问题的最终治疗方案,因为每种程序都会诱发与该疾病相关的一些临床并发症。因此,本研究评估了索非布韦在轻度 COVID-19 门诊患者中的早期使用情况:这项随机临床试验研究在 17 Shahrivar Ahvaz 健康中心对 360 名轻度 COVID-19 感染患者进行了研究。这些患者被随机分为干预组和对照组。对照组和干预组分别接受 400 毫克索非布韦和安慰剂治疗 7 天。治疗开始 14 天后,对症状持续时间、住院必要性、平均住院时间和死亡率进行评估:结果:干预组和对照组最常见的症状是咳嗽,频率分别为 46 次(25.6%)和 54 次(30%)。两组患者首次出现与疾病相关的临床症状的频率差异无统计学意义(P=0.2)。对照组患者出现症状的平均天数为(14±4.17)天,而干预组为(12.12±3.15)天(P=0.08)。对照组和干预组的住院频率分别为 7(3.8%)和 4(2.22%)(P=0.11)。此外,对照组和干预组的平均住院天数分别为 4±1.1 天和 3±0.8 天(P=0.15)。此外,两组患者在重症监护室住院的频率(0)和死亡率(0)相似:结论:单用索非布韦治疗轻度COVID-19门诊患者不能发挥显著作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Therapeutic Effect of Sofosbuvir in Outpatients with COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has engendered scores of deaths worldwide. Just as the development of varying procedures during the pandemic has helped inhibit the disease, none is considered a definitive treatment protocol for this problem, as each induces some clinical complications pertinent to the disease. This study thus assessed the early use of sofosbuvir in outpatients with mild COVID-19.

Materials and methods: This randomized clinical trial study was conducted on 360 patients with mild COVID-19 infection at 17 Shahrivar Ahvaz Health Center. These patients were randomly divided into the intervention and control groups. Both the control and intervention groups received 400 mg of sofosbuvir and a placebo for seven days, respectively. After 14 days from the onset of the treatment, the duration of symptoms, the necessity of hospitalization, the mean of hospitalization duration, and mortality were assessed.

Results: The most common symptoms in the intervention and control groups were coughs with a frequency of 46 (25.6%) and 54(30%), respectively. The two groups showed no statistically significant difference in the frequency of the first observed clinical symptom related to the disease (P=0.2). The mean days that the patients were symptomatic in the control group were 14±4.17, whereas, in the intervention group, it was 12.12±3.15 (P=0.08). The frequency of hospitalization in the control and intervention groups was 7 (3.8%) and 4 (2.22%), respectively (P=0.11). Moreover, the mean days of hospitalization in the control and the intervention groups were 4±1.1 and 3±0.8, respectively (P=0.15). In addition, the two groups had a similar frequency of hospitalization in the ICU (0) and mortality rate (0).

Conclusion: Sofosbuvir alone cannot play a significant role in the treatment of outpatients with mild COVID-19.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Galen Medical Journal
Galen Medical Journal MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: GMJ is open access, peer-reviewed journal in English and supported by Noncommunicable Diseases (NCD) Research Center of Fasa University of Medical Sciences that publishing by Salvia Medical Sciences Ltd. GMJ will consider all types of the following scientific papers for publication: - Editorial’s choice - Original Researches - Review articles - Case reports - Case series - Letter (to editors, to authors, etc) - Short communications - Medical Idea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信