Sandra Hapca, Louise Peet, Christine Gibson, Andrea Harvey, Patrice Forget
{"title":"出院后阿片类药物的持续使用与阿片类药物管理:单中心回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Sandra Hapca, Louise Peet, Christine Gibson, Andrea Harvey, Patrice Forget","doi":"10.1177/20494637241276106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Persistent post-operative opioid use is a public health concern contributing to population morbidity and mortality. Opioid stewardship is a strategy adopted to rationalise opioid prescribing and limit harmful use. We describe persistent post-discharge opioid use rates and risk factors in a single-centre cohort and describe the opioid stewardship role of our Acute Pain Service (APS). We conducted a retrospective 4-year cohort study of inpatients referred to the APS and discharged with new strong opioids prescribed. We investigated persistent post-discharge opioid use rates, risk factors and patterns of opioid use after community follow-up by APS. We found that 24% of patients discharged with new strong opioids developed persistent opioid use. Risk factors associated with persistent post-discharge opioid use in our cohort included female sex (Odds Ratios [95% confidence interval], <i>p</i> value, OR: 1.89 [1.11-3.22], <i>p</i> = 0.019), pre-admission mental health history (OR: 2.85 [1.64-4.95], <i>p</i> < 0.001) and pre-admission opioid use (OR: 1.79 [1.03-3.11], <i>p</i> = 0.004). A smaller proportion of patients with APS follow-up in community developed persistent opioid use (22%) compared to those without (32%). We conclude that having opioids prescribed at time of discharge can result in persistent opioid use in up to a quarter of patients. The APS has an important protective role in rationalising opioid use in hospital but also following discharge. Development of further opioid stewardship policies is needed including improvement of patient and staff awareness and pre-operative assessment of patients with recognised risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"20494637241276106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Persistent post-discharge opioid use and opioid stewardship: A single-centre retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Hapca, Louise Peet, Christine Gibson, Andrea Harvey, Patrice Forget\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20494637241276106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Persistent post-operative opioid use is a public health concern contributing to population morbidity and mortality. Opioid stewardship is a strategy adopted to rationalise opioid prescribing and limit harmful use. We describe persistent post-discharge opioid use rates and risk factors in a single-centre cohort and describe the opioid stewardship role of our Acute Pain Service (APS). We conducted a retrospective 4-year cohort study of inpatients referred to the APS and discharged with new strong opioids prescribed. We investigated persistent post-discharge opioid use rates, risk factors and patterns of opioid use after community follow-up by APS. We found that 24% of patients discharged with new strong opioids developed persistent opioid use. Risk factors associated with persistent post-discharge opioid use in our cohort included female sex (Odds Ratios [95% confidence interval], <i>p</i> value, OR: 1.89 [1.11-3.22], <i>p</i> = 0.019), pre-admission mental health history (OR: 2.85 [1.64-4.95], <i>p</i> < 0.001) and pre-admission opioid use (OR: 1.79 [1.03-3.11], <i>p</i> = 0.004). A smaller proportion of patients with APS follow-up in community developed persistent opioid use (22%) compared to those without (32%). We conclude that having opioids prescribed at time of discharge can result in persistent opioid use in up to a quarter of patients. The APS has an important protective role in rationalising opioid use in hospital but also following discharge. Development of further opioid stewardship policies is needed including improvement of patient and staff awareness and pre-operative assessment of patients with recognised risk factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"20494637241276106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561955/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637241276106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637241276106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
术后持续使用阿片类药物是一个公共卫生问题,会导致人群发病和死亡。阿片类药物管理是一种旨在合理开具阿片类药物处方并限制有害使用的策略。我们描述了单中心队列中出院后阿片类药物的持续使用率和风险因素,并介绍了我们的急性疼痛服务(APS)在阿片类药物管理中的作用。我们对转诊至 APS 并开具了新的强效阿片类药物处方的出院住院患者进行了一项为期 4 年的回顾性队列研究。我们调查了出院后阿片类药物的持续使用率、风险因素以及 APS 社区随访后阿片类药物的使用模式。我们发现,24% 的患者在出院时使用了新的强效阿片类药物,并形成了持续使用阿片类药物的现象。在我们的队列中,与出院后持续使用阿片类药物相关的风险因素包括女性(Odds Ratios [95% confidence interval], p value, OR: 1.89 [1.11-3.22], p = 0.019)、入院前精神健康史(OR: 2.85 [1.64-4.95], p < 0.001)和入院前阿片类药物使用(OR: 1.79 [1.03-3.11], p = 0.004)。在社区接受 APS 随访的患者中,持续使用阿片类药物的比例(22%)低于未接受随访的患者(32%)。我们的结论是,出院时开具阿片类药物处方会导致多达四分之一的患者持续使用阿片类药物。阿片类药物管理计划(APS)在合理使用住院阿片类药物以及出院后阿片类药物使用方面发挥着重要的保护作用。需要进一步制定阿片类药物管理政策,包括提高患者和医务人员的认识,以及对具有公认风险因素的患者进行术前评估。
Persistent post-discharge opioid use and opioid stewardship: A single-centre retrospective cohort study.
Persistent post-operative opioid use is a public health concern contributing to population morbidity and mortality. Opioid stewardship is a strategy adopted to rationalise opioid prescribing and limit harmful use. We describe persistent post-discharge opioid use rates and risk factors in a single-centre cohort and describe the opioid stewardship role of our Acute Pain Service (APS). We conducted a retrospective 4-year cohort study of inpatients referred to the APS and discharged with new strong opioids prescribed. We investigated persistent post-discharge opioid use rates, risk factors and patterns of opioid use after community follow-up by APS. We found that 24% of patients discharged with new strong opioids developed persistent opioid use. Risk factors associated with persistent post-discharge opioid use in our cohort included female sex (Odds Ratios [95% confidence interval], p value, OR: 1.89 [1.11-3.22], p = 0.019), pre-admission mental health history (OR: 2.85 [1.64-4.95], p < 0.001) and pre-admission opioid use (OR: 1.79 [1.03-3.11], p = 0.004). A smaller proportion of patients with APS follow-up in community developed persistent opioid use (22%) compared to those without (32%). We conclude that having opioids prescribed at time of discharge can result in persistent opioid use in up to a quarter of patients. The APS has an important protective role in rationalising opioid use in hospital but also following discharge. Development of further opioid stewardship policies is needed including improvement of patient and staff awareness and pre-operative assessment of patients with recognised risk factors.
期刊介绍:
British Journal of Pain is a peer-reviewed quarterly British journal with an international multidisciplinary Editorial Board. The journal publishes original research and reviews on all major aspects of pain and pain management. Reviews reflect the body of evidence of the topic and are suitable for a multidisciplinary readership. Where empirical evidence is lacking, the reviews reflect the generally held opinions of experts in the field. The Journal has broadened its scope and has become a forum for publishing primary research together with brief reports related to pain and pain interventions. Submissions from all over the world have been published and are welcome. Official journal of the British Pain Society.