急性心肌梗死中的秋水仙碱

IF 96.2 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
New England Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-13 Epub Date: 2024-11-17 DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2405922
Sanjit S Jolly, Marc-André d'Entremont, Shun Fu Lee, Rajibul Mian, Jessica Tyrwhitt, Sasko Kedev, Gilles Montalescot, Jan H Cornel, Goran Stanković, Raul Moreno, Robert F Storey, Timothy D Henry, Shamir R Mehta, Matthias Bossard, Petr Kala, Jamie Layland, Biljana Zafirovska, P J Devereaux, John Eikelboom, John A Cairns, Binita Shah, Tej Sheth, Sanjib K Sharma, Wadea Tarhuni, David Conen, Sarah Tawadros, Shahar Lavi, Salim Yusuf
{"title":"急性心肌梗死中的秋水仙碱","authors":"Sanjit S Jolly, Marc-André d'Entremont, Shun Fu Lee, Rajibul Mian, Jessica Tyrwhitt, Sasko Kedev, Gilles Montalescot, Jan H Cornel, Goran Stanković, Raul Moreno, Robert F Storey, Timothy D Henry, Shamir R Mehta, Matthias Bossard, Petr Kala, Jamie Layland, Biljana Zafirovska, P J Devereaux, John Eikelboom, John A Cairns, Binita Shah, Tej Sheth, Sanjib K Sharma, Wadea Tarhuni, David Conen, Sarah Tawadros, Shahar Lavi, Salim Yusuf","doi":"10.1056/NEJMoa2405922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inflammation is associated with adverse cardiovascular events. Data from recent trials suggest that colchicine reduces the risk of cardiovascular events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design, we randomly assigned patients who had myocardial infarction to receive either colchicine or placebo and either spironolactone or placebo. The results of the colchicine trial are reported here. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned ischemia-driven coronary revascularization, evaluated in a time-to-event analysis. C-reactive protein was measured at 3 months in a subgroup of patients, and safety was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7062 patients at 104 centers in 14 countries underwent randomization; at the time of analysis, the vital status was unknown for 45 patients (0.6%), and this information was most likely missing at random. A primary-outcome event occurred in 322 of 3528 patients (9.1%) in the colchicine group and 327 of 3534 patients (9.3%) in the placebo group over a median follow-up period of 3 years (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 1.16; P = 0.93). The incidence of individual components of the primary outcome appeared to be similar in the two groups. The least-squares mean difference in C-reactive protein levels between the colchicine group and the placebo group at 3 months, adjusted according to the baseline values, was -1.28 mg per liter (95% CI, -1.81 to -0.75). Diarrhea occurred in a higher percentage of patients with colchicine than with placebo (10.2% vs. 6.6%; P<0.001), but the incidence of serious infections did not differ between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients who had myocardial infarction, treatment with colchicine, when started soon after myocardial infarction and continued for a median of 3 years, did not reduce the incidence of the composite primary outcome (death from cardiovascular causes, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned ischemia-driven coronary revascularization). (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; CLEAR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03048825.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"633-642"},"PeriodicalIF":96.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Colchicine in Acute Myocardial Infarction.\",\"authors\":\"Sanjit S Jolly, Marc-André d'Entremont, Shun Fu Lee, Rajibul Mian, Jessica Tyrwhitt, Sasko Kedev, Gilles Montalescot, Jan H Cornel, Goran Stanković, Raul Moreno, Robert F Storey, Timothy D Henry, Shamir R Mehta, Matthias Bossard, Petr Kala, Jamie Layland, Biljana Zafirovska, P J Devereaux, John Eikelboom, John A Cairns, Binita Shah, Tej Sheth, Sanjib K Sharma, Wadea Tarhuni, David Conen, Sarah Tawadros, Shahar Lavi, Salim Yusuf\",\"doi\":\"10.1056/NEJMoa2405922\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inflammation is associated with adverse cardiovascular events. Data from recent trials suggest that colchicine reduces the risk of cardiovascular events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design, we randomly assigned patients who had myocardial infarction to receive either colchicine or placebo and either spironolactone or placebo. The results of the colchicine trial are reported here. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned ischemia-driven coronary revascularization, evaluated in a time-to-event analysis. C-reactive protein was measured at 3 months in a subgroup of patients, and safety was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7062 patients at 104 centers in 14 countries underwent randomization; at the time of analysis, the vital status was unknown for 45 patients (0.6%), and this information was most likely missing at random. A primary-outcome event occurred in 322 of 3528 patients (9.1%) in the colchicine group and 327 of 3534 patients (9.3%) in the placebo group over a median follow-up period of 3 years (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 1.16; P = 0.93). The incidence of individual components of the primary outcome appeared to be similar in the two groups. The least-squares mean difference in C-reactive protein levels between the colchicine group and the placebo group at 3 months, adjusted according to the baseline values, was -1.28 mg per liter (95% CI, -1.81 to -0.75). Diarrhea occurred in a higher percentage of patients with colchicine than with placebo (10.2% vs. 6.6%; P<0.001), but the incidence of serious infections did not differ between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients who had myocardial infarction, treatment with colchicine, when started soon after myocardial infarction and continued for a median of 3 years, did not reduce the incidence of the composite primary outcome (death from cardiovascular causes, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned ischemia-driven coronary revascularization). (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; CLEAR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03048825.).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New England Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"633-642\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":96.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New England Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2405922\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New England Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2405922","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:炎症与不良心血管事件有关。最近的试验数据表明,秋水仙碱可降低心血管事件的风险:在这项2乘2因子设计的多中心试验中,我们随机分配心肌梗死患者接受秋水仙碱或安慰剂以及螺内酯或安慰剂治疗。这里报告的是秋水仙碱试验的结果。主要疗效结果是心血管原因导致的死亡、复发性心肌梗死、中风或计划外缺血导致的冠状动脉血运重建的综合结果,以时间到事件分析法进行评估。在3个月时对一组患者的C反应蛋白进行了测定,并对安全性进行了评估:14个国家104个中心的7062名患者接受了随机化治疗;在分析时,有45名患者(0.6%)的生命体征不详,这些信息很可能是随机缺失的。在3年的中位随访期内,秋水仙碱组3528名患者中有322名(9.1%)发生了主要结局事件,安慰剂组3534名患者中有327名(9.3%)发生了主要结局事件(危险比为0.99;95%置信区间[CI]为0.85至1.16;P = 0.93)。两组主要结果的各个组成部分的发生率似乎相似。根据基线值调整后,3 个月时秋水仙碱组与安慰剂组之间 C 反应蛋白水平的最小二乘平均差异为-1.28 毫克/升(95% CI,-1.81 至-0.75)。服用秋水仙碱的患者发生腹泻的比例高于服用安慰剂的患者(10.2% 对 6.6%;PConclusions.PCR):在心肌梗死患者中,如果在心肌梗死后不久就开始使用秋水仙碱并持续中位 3 年,并不会降低复合主要结局(心血管原因导致的死亡、复发性心肌梗死、中风或计划外缺血导致的冠状动脉血运重建)的发生率。(由加拿大卫生研究院等机构资助;CLEAR ClinicalTrials.gov 编号:NCT03048825)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Colchicine in Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Background: Inflammation is associated with adverse cardiovascular events. Data from recent trials suggest that colchicine reduces the risk of cardiovascular events.

Methods: In this multicenter trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design, we randomly assigned patients who had myocardial infarction to receive either colchicine or placebo and either spironolactone or placebo. The results of the colchicine trial are reported here. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned ischemia-driven coronary revascularization, evaluated in a time-to-event analysis. C-reactive protein was measured at 3 months in a subgroup of patients, and safety was also assessed.

Results: A total of 7062 patients at 104 centers in 14 countries underwent randomization; at the time of analysis, the vital status was unknown for 45 patients (0.6%), and this information was most likely missing at random. A primary-outcome event occurred in 322 of 3528 patients (9.1%) in the colchicine group and 327 of 3534 patients (9.3%) in the placebo group over a median follow-up period of 3 years (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 1.16; P = 0.93). The incidence of individual components of the primary outcome appeared to be similar in the two groups. The least-squares mean difference in C-reactive protein levels between the colchicine group and the placebo group at 3 months, adjusted according to the baseline values, was -1.28 mg per liter (95% CI, -1.81 to -0.75). Diarrhea occurred in a higher percentage of patients with colchicine than with placebo (10.2% vs. 6.6%; P<0.001), but the incidence of serious infections did not differ between groups.

Conclusions: Among patients who had myocardial infarction, treatment with colchicine, when started soon after myocardial infarction and continued for a median of 3 years, did not reduce the incidence of the composite primary outcome (death from cardiovascular causes, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned ischemia-driven coronary revascularization). (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; CLEAR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03048825.).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New England Journal of Medicine
New England Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
145.40
自引率
0.60%
发文量
1839
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) stands as the foremost medical journal and website worldwide. With an impressive history spanning over two centuries, NEJM boasts a consistent publication of superb, peer-reviewed research and engaging clinical content. Our primary objective revolves around delivering high-caliber information and findings at the juncture of biomedical science and clinical practice. We strive to present this knowledge in formats that are not only comprehensible but also hold practical value, effectively influencing healthcare practices and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信