利用胰腺灌注 CT 参数的相对评估来支持适当的胰腺腺癌诊断。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yoshihiro Konno, Kazuho Takisawa, Masafumi Kanoto, Yoshiki Ishii, Yoshie Obata, Tetsuya Ishizawa, Akiko Matsuda, Yasuharu Kakizaki
{"title":"利用胰腺灌注 CT 参数的相对评估来支持适当的胰腺腺癌诊断。","authors":"Yoshihiro Konno, Kazuho Takisawa, Masafumi Kanoto, Yoshiki Ishii, Yoshie Obata, Tetsuya Ishizawa, Akiko Matsuda, Yasuharu Kakizaki","doi":"10.1016/j.pan.2024.11.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the effect of relative evaluation of perfusion computed tomography (PCT) parameters in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of the 117 patients in which PCT was performed (May 2019 to June 2023), 99 patients with mass lesions (MLs), including 50 PAC and 11 patients with mass-forming pancreatitis (MFP), and 15 patients without MLs but with main pancreatic duct (MPD) abnormalities, including 6 PAC and 7 no diagnosis of malignancy (NDM) cases were enrolled in this study. Parameter values were obtained from parametric maps of blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV), and mean transit time (MTT) for the ML and abnormal MPD part (AMP), pancreas and spleen. Diagnostic performance was evaluated based on receiver operating characteristic analysis for absolute values and relative values for pancreas and spleen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BF<sub>ML</sub>, BV<sub>ML</sub>, BF<sub>ML/Pancreas</sub>, BF<sub>ML/Spleen</sub>, BV<sub>ML/Pancreas</sub> and BV<sub>ML/Spleen</sub> were significantly lower in PAC than MFP cases. Areas under the curve (AUCs) for BF<sub>ML</sub>, BF<sub>ML/Pancreas</sub>, BF<sub>ML/Spleen</sub> were 0.71 (sensitivity, 54 %; specificity, 91 %), 0.80 (sensitivity, 74 %; specificity, 82 %) and 0.79 (sensitivity, 68 %; specificity. 91 %), respectively. The AUCs for BV<sub>ML</sub>, BV<sub>ML/Pancreas</sub>, BV<sub>ML/Spleen</sub> were 0.72 (sensitivity, 48 %; specificity, 100 %), 0.85 (sensitivity, 76 %; specificity, 91 %) and 0.87 (sensitivity, 76 %; specificity, 91 %), respectively, with significantly better diagnostic performance on relative evaluation (P < 0.05). BV<sub>AMP/Spleen</sub> and MTT<sub>AMP/Spleen</sub> were significantly higher in PAC than NDM cases, with AUCs of 1 (100 % sensitivity and specificity) and 0.91 (sensitivity, 86 %; specificity, 100 %), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Relative evaluation of PCT parameters is expected to contribute to more appropriate diagnosis of PAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":19976,"journal":{"name":"Pancreatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization of relative evaluation of pancreatic perfusion CT parameters to support appropriate pancreatic adenocarcinoma diagnosis.\",\"authors\":\"Yoshihiro Konno, Kazuho Takisawa, Masafumi Kanoto, Yoshiki Ishii, Yoshie Obata, Tetsuya Ishizawa, Akiko Matsuda, Yasuharu Kakizaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pan.2024.11.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the effect of relative evaluation of perfusion computed tomography (PCT) parameters in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of the 117 patients in which PCT was performed (May 2019 to June 2023), 99 patients with mass lesions (MLs), including 50 PAC and 11 patients with mass-forming pancreatitis (MFP), and 15 patients without MLs but with main pancreatic duct (MPD) abnormalities, including 6 PAC and 7 no diagnosis of malignancy (NDM) cases were enrolled in this study. Parameter values were obtained from parametric maps of blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV), and mean transit time (MTT) for the ML and abnormal MPD part (AMP), pancreas and spleen. Diagnostic performance was evaluated based on receiver operating characteristic analysis for absolute values and relative values for pancreas and spleen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BF<sub>ML</sub>, BV<sub>ML</sub>, BF<sub>ML/Pancreas</sub>, BF<sub>ML/Spleen</sub>, BV<sub>ML/Pancreas</sub> and BV<sub>ML/Spleen</sub> were significantly lower in PAC than MFP cases. Areas under the curve (AUCs) for BF<sub>ML</sub>, BF<sub>ML/Pancreas</sub>, BF<sub>ML/Spleen</sub> were 0.71 (sensitivity, 54 %; specificity, 91 %), 0.80 (sensitivity, 74 %; specificity, 82 %) and 0.79 (sensitivity, 68 %; specificity. 91 %), respectively. The AUCs for BV<sub>ML</sub>, BV<sub>ML/Pancreas</sub>, BV<sub>ML/Spleen</sub> were 0.72 (sensitivity, 48 %; specificity, 100 %), 0.85 (sensitivity, 76 %; specificity, 91 %) and 0.87 (sensitivity, 76 %; specificity, 91 %), respectively, with significantly better diagnostic performance on relative evaluation (P < 0.05). BV<sub>AMP/Spleen</sub> and MTT<sub>AMP/Spleen</sub> were significantly higher in PAC than NDM cases, with AUCs of 1 (100 % sensitivity and specificity) and 0.91 (sensitivity, 86 %; specificity, 100 %), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Relative evaluation of PCT parameters is expected to contribute to more appropriate diagnosis of PAC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pancreatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pancreatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2024.11.008\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2024.11.008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究灌注计算机断层扫描(PCT)参数的相对评估对胰腺腺癌(PAC)诊断的影响:方法:在进行了PCT检查的117例患者中(2019年5月至2023年6月),99例有肿块病变(MLs)的患者(包括50例PAC和11例肿块形成性胰腺炎(MFP)患者)和15例无MLs但有主胰管(MPD)异常的患者(包括6例PAC和7例未诊断为恶性肿瘤(NDM)病例)被纳入本研究。参数值来自 ML 和 MPD 异常部分(AMP)、胰腺和脾脏的血流量(BF)、血容量(BV)和平均通过时间(MTT)的参数图。根据接收器操作特征分析对胰腺和脾脏的绝对值和相对值进行诊断性能评估:PAC病例的BFML、BVML、BFML/胰腺、BFML/脾脏、BVML/胰腺和BVML/脾脏均显著低于MFP病例。BFML、BFML/胰腺、BFML/脾的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.71(灵敏度 54 %;特异性 91 %)、0.80(灵敏度 74 %;特异性 82 %)和 0.79(灵敏度 68 %;特异性 91 %)。BVML、BVML/胰腺、BVML/脾脏的 AUC 分别为 0.72(灵敏度,48 %;特异性,100 %)、0.85(灵敏度,76 %;特异性,91 %)和 0.87(灵敏度,76 %;特异性,91 %)。87(灵敏度,76 %;特异性,91 %),相对评估的诊断性能明显更好(P AMP/脾和 MTTAMP/脾在 PAC 病例中明显高于 NDM 病例,AUC 分别为 1(灵敏度和特异性均为 100 %)和 0.91(灵敏度,86 %;特异性,100 %)):结论:PCT参数的相对评估有望为更恰当地诊断PAC做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilization of relative evaluation of pancreatic perfusion CT parameters to support appropriate pancreatic adenocarcinoma diagnosis.

Objectives: To investigate the effect of relative evaluation of perfusion computed tomography (PCT) parameters in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC).

Methods: Of the 117 patients in which PCT was performed (May 2019 to June 2023), 99 patients with mass lesions (MLs), including 50 PAC and 11 patients with mass-forming pancreatitis (MFP), and 15 patients without MLs but with main pancreatic duct (MPD) abnormalities, including 6 PAC and 7 no diagnosis of malignancy (NDM) cases were enrolled in this study. Parameter values were obtained from parametric maps of blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV), and mean transit time (MTT) for the ML and abnormal MPD part (AMP), pancreas and spleen. Diagnostic performance was evaluated based on receiver operating characteristic analysis for absolute values and relative values for pancreas and spleen.

Results: BFML, BVML, BFML/Pancreas, BFML/Spleen, BVML/Pancreas and BVML/Spleen were significantly lower in PAC than MFP cases. Areas under the curve (AUCs) for BFML, BFML/Pancreas, BFML/Spleen were 0.71 (sensitivity, 54 %; specificity, 91 %), 0.80 (sensitivity, 74 %; specificity, 82 %) and 0.79 (sensitivity, 68 %; specificity. 91 %), respectively. The AUCs for BVML, BVML/Pancreas, BVML/Spleen were 0.72 (sensitivity, 48 %; specificity, 100 %), 0.85 (sensitivity, 76 %; specificity, 91 %) and 0.87 (sensitivity, 76 %; specificity, 91 %), respectively, with significantly better diagnostic performance on relative evaluation (P < 0.05). BVAMP/Spleen and MTTAMP/Spleen were significantly higher in PAC than NDM cases, with AUCs of 1 (100 % sensitivity and specificity) and 0.91 (sensitivity, 86 %; specificity, 100 %), respectively.

Conclusions: Relative evaluation of PCT parameters is expected to contribute to more appropriate diagnosis of PAC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pancreatology
Pancreatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
194
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Pancreatology is the official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP), the European Pancreatic Club (EPC) and several national societies and study groups around the world. Dedicated to the understanding and treatment of exocrine as well as endocrine pancreatic disease, this multidisciplinary periodical publishes original basic, translational and clinical pancreatic research from a range of fields including gastroenterology, oncology, surgery, pharmacology, cellular and molecular biology as well as endocrinology, immunology and epidemiology. Readers can expect to gain new insights into pancreatic physiology and into the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapeutic approaches and prognosis of pancreatic diseases. The journal features original articles, case reports, consensus guidelines and topical, cutting edge reviews, thus representing a source of valuable, novel information for clinical and basic researchers alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信