维生素 D 与妊娠糖尿病之间的因果关系:双样本孟德尔随机研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Pei Zhang, XiaoHong Hu, YanQi Jin
{"title":"维生素 D 与妊娠糖尿病之间的因果关系:双样本孟德尔随机研究。","authors":"Pei Zhang, XiaoHong Hu, YanQi Jin","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2024.2427760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous articles on the relationship between vitamin D and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) were inconsistent. Their relationship has been observed primarily through observational studies, and the causality of this association has not been established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) research was conducted to test the causal association between vitamin D and GDM, utilizing publically available statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). This study obtained genetic variants from GWAS including vitamin D (<i>N</i> = 373,045,10,783,672 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms SNPs), and GDM (5687 cases and 117,892 controls). The major technique was the inverse variance weighted approach (IVW), although there were other approaches as well, such as MR-Egger regression, weighted median, weighted mode, and simple mode. Additionally, we conducted sensitivity analyses to detect any potential diversity and horizontal pleiotropy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study suggested that there was no causal link between vitamin D and GDM (all methods <i>p</i> > 0.05). For heterogeneity, MR egger Q value was 113.7, <i>p</i> < 0.05; IVW Q value was 114.7, <i>p</i> < 0.05. Therefore, random- effects IVW approach was applied. Regarding pleiotropy, the MR Egger regression intercept was 0.0046, which was close to zero with a <i>p</i> value of 0.452, suggesting the absence of pleiotropy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed no assosiation between genetically predicted vitamin D and the risk of GDM, implying that insufficient vitamin D may do not confer an increased susceptibility to GDM.</p>","PeriodicalId":50146,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal association between vitamin D and gestational diabetes mellitus: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.\",\"authors\":\"Pei Zhang, XiaoHong Hu, YanQi Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14767058.2024.2427760\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous articles on the relationship between vitamin D and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) were inconsistent. Their relationship has been observed primarily through observational studies, and the causality of this association has not been established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) research was conducted to test the causal association between vitamin D and GDM, utilizing publically available statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). This study obtained genetic variants from GWAS including vitamin D (<i>N</i> = 373,045,10,783,672 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms SNPs), and GDM (5687 cases and 117,892 controls). The major technique was the inverse variance weighted approach (IVW), although there were other approaches as well, such as MR-Egger regression, weighted median, weighted mode, and simple mode. Additionally, we conducted sensitivity analyses to detect any potential diversity and horizontal pleiotropy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study suggested that there was no causal link between vitamin D and GDM (all methods <i>p</i> > 0.05). For heterogeneity, MR egger Q value was 113.7, <i>p</i> < 0.05; IVW Q value was 114.7, <i>p</i> < 0.05. Therefore, random- effects IVW approach was applied. Regarding pleiotropy, the MR Egger regression intercept was 0.0046, which was close to zero with a <i>p</i> value of 0.452, suggesting the absence of pleiotropy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed no assosiation between genetically predicted vitamin D and the risk of GDM, implying that insufficient vitamin D may do not confer an increased susceptibility to GDM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2024.2427760\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2024.2427760","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以往关于维生素 D 与妊娠糖尿病(GDM)之间关系的文章并不一致。它们之间的关系主要是通过观察性研究观察到的,这种关联的因果关系尚未确定:方法:利用公开的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)统计数据,开展了一项双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)研究,以检验维生素 D 与 GDM 之间的因果关系。这项研究从全基因组关联研究(GWAS)中获得了包括维生素 D(N = 373,045,10,783,672 单核苷酸多态性 SNPs)和 GDM(5687 例病例和 117,892 例对照)在内的遗传变异。主要技术是反方差加权法(IVW),但也有其他方法,如 MR-Egger 回归、加权中位数、加权模式和简单模式。此外,我们还进行了敏感性分析,以检测任何潜在的多样性和水平多效性:研究表明,维生素 D 与 GDM 之间不存在因果关系(所有方法的 P > 0.05)。在异质性方面,MR egger Q 值为 113.7,p p 值为 0.452,表明不存在多效性:我们没有观察到基因预测的维生素 D 与 GDM 风险之间的关联,这意味着维生素 D 不足可能不会增加 GDM 的易感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Causal association between vitamin D and gestational diabetes mellitus: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.

Background: Previous articles on the relationship between vitamin D and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) were inconsistent. Their relationship has been observed primarily through observational studies, and the causality of this association has not been established.

Methods: A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) research was conducted to test the causal association between vitamin D and GDM, utilizing publically available statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). This study obtained genetic variants from GWAS including vitamin D (N = 373,045,10,783,672 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms SNPs), and GDM (5687 cases and 117,892 controls). The major technique was the inverse variance weighted approach (IVW), although there were other approaches as well, such as MR-Egger regression, weighted median, weighted mode, and simple mode. Additionally, we conducted sensitivity analyses to detect any potential diversity and horizontal pleiotropy.

Results: The study suggested that there was no causal link between vitamin D and GDM (all methods p > 0.05). For heterogeneity, MR egger Q value was 113.7, p < 0.05; IVW Q value was 114.7, p < 0.05. Therefore, random- effects IVW approach was applied. Regarding pleiotropy, the MR Egger regression intercept was 0.0046, which was close to zero with a p value of 0.452, suggesting the absence of pleiotropy.

Conclusions: We observed no assosiation between genetically predicted vitamin D and the risk of GDM, implying that insufficient vitamin D may do not confer an increased susceptibility to GDM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of The European Association of Perinatal Medicine, The Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies and The International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. The journal publishes a wide range of peer-reviewed research on the obstetric, medical, genetic, mental health and surgical complications of pregnancy and their effects on the mother, fetus and neonate. Research on audit, evaluation and clinical care in maternal-fetal and perinatal medicine is also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信