对小视弱视治疗的看法--斯堪的纳维亚视光学矫正师问卷调查研究。

Q3 Medicine
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.22599/bioj.316
Jannicke Røe, Gemma Arblaster
{"title":"对小视弱视治疗的看法--斯堪的纳维亚视光学矫正师问卷调查研究。","authors":"Jannicke Røe, Gemma Arblaster","doi":"10.22599/bioj.316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Microtropia is a small angle strabismus of less than or equal to ten prism diopters. It often co-exists with anisometropia, and patients may require amblyopia treatment. Diplopia following amblyopia treatment is considered rare, but older literature can advise caution when treating amblyopia in microtropia. This study aimed to explore orthoptists' opinions on amblyopia treatment in microtropia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Orthoptists working in Scandinavia were invited to complete an online questionnaire regarding their views on amblyopia treatment. They were presented with three different clinical scenarios: 1) patient with anisometropia; 2) patient with anisometropia and microtropia with identity; and 3) patient with anisometropia and microtropia without identity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire received responses from 30 orthoptists, which were analysed. The results showed a significantly higher concern for diplopia in patients with microtropia undergoing amblyopia treatment than in patients with anisometropia. They responded that to prevent diplopia, it is more important to stop amblyopia treatment before equal visual acuity (VA) is reached in microtropia compared to anisometropia. Thus, amblyopia treatment was stopped more often in microtropia, even if VA was improving and diplopia was absent. Equal VA was perceived to be more difficult to achieve in microtropia, both with and without identity, compared to anisometropia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite more recent evidence that diplopia following amblyopia treatment is extremely rare, orthoptists working in Scandinavia reported more concerns about diplopia when treating amblyopia in microtropia than in anisometropia. Stopping amblyopia treatment in microtropia before equal VA was achieved was considered somewhat important to prevent diplopia. Orthoptists also reported that equal VA was difficult to achieve in patients with microtropia, both with and without identity. Further research would help improve the evidence and inform clinical decisions about microtropia and amblyopia treatment in microtropia.</p>","PeriodicalId":36083,"journal":{"name":"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"226-234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568811/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opinions on Amblyopia Treatment in Microtropia - A Questionnaire Study of Orthoptists in Scandinavia.\",\"authors\":\"Jannicke Røe, Gemma Arblaster\",\"doi\":\"10.22599/bioj.316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Microtropia is a small angle strabismus of less than or equal to ten prism diopters. It often co-exists with anisometropia, and patients may require amblyopia treatment. Diplopia following amblyopia treatment is considered rare, but older literature can advise caution when treating amblyopia in microtropia. This study aimed to explore orthoptists' opinions on amblyopia treatment in microtropia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Orthoptists working in Scandinavia were invited to complete an online questionnaire regarding their views on amblyopia treatment. They were presented with three different clinical scenarios: 1) patient with anisometropia; 2) patient with anisometropia and microtropia with identity; and 3) patient with anisometropia and microtropia without identity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire received responses from 30 orthoptists, which were analysed. The results showed a significantly higher concern for diplopia in patients with microtropia undergoing amblyopia treatment than in patients with anisometropia. They responded that to prevent diplopia, it is more important to stop amblyopia treatment before equal visual acuity (VA) is reached in microtropia compared to anisometropia. Thus, amblyopia treatment was stopped more often in microtropia, even if VA was improving and diplopia was absent. Equal VA was perceived to be more difficult to achieve in microtropia, both with and without identity, compared to anisometropia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite more recent evidence that diplopia following amblyopia treatment is extremely rare, orthoptists working in Scandinavia reported more concerns about diplopia when treating amblyopia in microtropia than in anisometropia. Stopping amblyopia treatment in microtropia before equal VA was achieved was considered somewhat important to prevent diplopia. Orthoptists also reported that equal VA was difficult to achieve in patients with microtropia, both with and without identity. Further research would help improve the evidence and inform clinical decisions about microtropia and amblyopia treatment in microtropia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"226-234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568811/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22599/bioj.316\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22599/bioj.316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:小斜视是一种小于或等于十个棱镜度数的小角度斜视。它通常与异视同时存在,患者可能需要接受弱视治疗。弱视治疗后出现复视被认为是罕见的,但旧文献建议在治疗小斜视弱视时要谨慎。本研究旨在探讨矫视师对小向斜弱视治疗的看法:方法:邀请在斯堪的纳维亚工作的矫视师填写一份在线问卷,了解他们对弱视治疗的看法。向他们展示了三种不同的临床情景:1)患有异视的患者;2)患有异视和小斜视的患者;3)患有异视和小斜视的患者:共收到 30 名矫视师的问卷,并对问卷进行了分析。结果显示,接受弱视治疗的小内斜患者对复视的关注度明显高于异视患者。他们回答说,为了防止复视,小视弱视患者在达到同等视力(VA)之前停止弱视治疗比异视弱视患者更重要。因此,在小内斜视患者中,即使视力正在改善且没有复视,也更常停止弱视治疗。结论:结论:尽管最近有证据表明弱视治疗后复视的情况极为罕见,但在斯堪的纳维亚工作的矫视师在治疗小内斜视弱视时对复视的担忧仍多于治疗异视弱视时。他们认为,在实现等视力之前停止小内斜视弱视治疗对于预防复视有一定的重要性。视光学矫正师还报告说,小内斜视患者很难达到等视力,无论是有身份还是没有身份。进一步的研究将有助于完善相关证据,并为小向斜和小向斜弱视治疗的临床决策提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Opinions on Amblyopia Treatment in Microtropia - A Questionnaire Study of Orthoptists in Scandinavia.

Background: Microtropia is a small angle strabismus of less than or equal to ten prism diopters. It often co-exists with anisometropia, and patients may require amblyopia treatment. Diplopia following amblyopia treatment is considered rare, but older literature can advise caution when treating amblyopia in microtropia. This study aimed to explore orthoptists' opinions on amblyopia treatment in microtropia.

Methods: Orthoptists working in Scandinavia were invited to complete an online questionnaire regarding their views on amblyopia treatment. They were presented with three different clinical scenarios: 1) patient with anisometropia; 2) patient with anisometropia and microtropia with identity; and 3) patient with anisometropia and microtropia without identity.

Results: The questionnaire received responses from 30 orthoptists, which were analysed. The results showed a significantly higher concern for diplopia in patients with microtropia undergoing amblyopia treatment than in patients with anisometropia. They responded that to prevent diplopia, it is more important to stop amblyopia treatment before equal visual acuity (VA) is reached in microtropia compared to anisometropia. Thus, amblyopia treatment was stopped more often in microtropia, even if VA was improving and diplopia was absent. Equal VA was perceived to be more difficult to achieve in microtropia, both with and without identity, compared to anisometropia.

Conclusion: Despite more recent evidence that diplopia following amblyopia treatment is extremely rare, orthoptists working in Scandinavia reported more concerns about diplopia when treating amblyopia in microtropia than in anisometropia. Stopping amblyopia treatment in microtropia before equal VA was achieved was considered somewhat important to prevent diplopia. Orthoptists also reported that equal VA was difficult to achieve in patients with microtropia, both with and without identity. Further research would help improve the evidence and inform clinical decisions about microtropia and amblyopia treatment in microtropia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信