在评估尿道狭窄长度时,逆行尿道造影术(RUG)与排尿膀胱尿道造影术(VCUG)对比手术结果。

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Hojat Salimi, Iman Menbari Oskouie, Rayeheh Mohammadi, Mohammad Javad Nazarpour, Nasim Niknam, Mohammad Reza Nikoubakht, Seyed Hamid Mousavi
{"title":"在评估尿道狭窄长度时,逆行尿道造影术(RUG)与排尿膀胱尿道造影术(VCUG)对比手术结果。","authors":"Hojat Salimi, Iman Menbari Oskouie, Rayeheh Mohammadi, Mohammad Javad Nazarpour, Nasim Niknam, Mohammad Reza Nikoubakht, Seyed Hamid Mousavi","doi":"10.1177/03915603241292840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Retrograde urethrography (RUG) combined with voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) is the most common and preferred imaging modality for evaluating urethral strictures, despite its well-known limitations and disadvantages. In this study, we assessed the clinical relevance of RUG + VCUG, along with intraoperative assessment in measuring male urethral strictures.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study was a single-center retrospective study involving 134 male patients diagnosed with urethral stricture disease. All participants underwent RUG + VCUG before the intervention, and the results were interpreted by a single radiologist. The location and length of urethral strictures were assessed. The accuracy of urethral stricture measurements obtained from combined VCUG and RUG imaging was compared to intraoperative measurements, which served as the reference standard. Urethral strictures were classified into three types: membranous and bulbomembranous, bulbar, and penile.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 130 patients were included (38.14 ± 12.05 years) in the study. For patients with membranous and bulbar strictures, there were statistically significant differences in stricture length measurements between VCUG + RUG and surgical evaluation (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, for patients with penile strictures, the differences in stricture length measurements between VCUG + RUG and surgical evaluation were not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.448).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that RUG + VCUG may underestimate urethral stricture, particularly in the membranous and bulbar regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23574,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Journal","volume":" ","pages":"3915603241292840"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrograde urethrography (RUG) combined with voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) versus surgical findings in assessment of urethral strictures length.\",\"authors\":\"Hojat Salimi, Iman Menbari Oskouie, Rayeheh Mohammadi, Mohammad Javad Nazarpour, Nasim Niknam, Mohammad Reza Nikoubakht, Seyed Hamid Mousavi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03915603241292840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Retrograde urethrography (RUG) combined with voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) is the most common and preferred imaging modality for evaluating urethral strictures, despite its well-known limitations and disadvantages. In this study, we assessed the clinical relevance of RUG + VCUG, along with intraoperative assessment in measuring male urethral strictures.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study was a single-center retrospective study involving 134 male patients diagnosed with urethral stricture disease. All participants underwent RUG + VCUG before the intervention, and the results were interpreted by a single radiologist. The location and length of urethral strictures were assessed. The accuracy of urethral stricture measurements obtained from combined VCUG and RUG imaging was compared to intraoperative measurements, which served as the reference standard. Urethral strictures were classified into three types: membranous and bulbomembranous, bulbar, and penile.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 130 patients were included (38.14 ± 12.05 years) in the study. For patients with membranous and bulbar strictures, there were statistically significant differences in stricture length measurements between VCUG + RUG and surgical evaluation (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, for patients with penile strictures, the differences in stricture length measurements between VCUG + RUG and surgical evaluation were not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.448).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that RUG + VCUG may underestimate urethral stricture, particularly in the membranous and bulbar regions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologia Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3915603241292840\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologia Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603241292840\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603241292840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:逆行尿道造影术(RUG)结合排尿膀胱造影术(VCUG)是评估尿道狭窄最常见和首选的成像方式,尽管其局限性和缺点众所周知。在本研究中,我们评估了 RUG + VCUG 与术中评估在测量男性尿道狭窄方面的临床相关性:本研究是一项单中心回顾性研究,涉及 134 名确诊患有尿道狭窄疾病的男性患者。所有参与者在介入治疗前均接受了 RUG + VCUG 检查,检查结果由一名放射科医生解读。对尿道狭窄的位置和长度进行了评估。将 VCUG 和 RUG 联合成像获得的尿道狭窄测量结果的准确性与作为参考标准的术中测量结果进行了比较。尿道狭窄分为三种类型:膜性和球茎膜性、球部和阴茎部:研究共纳入 130 名患者(38.14 ± 12.05 岁)。对于膜性和球部狭窄患者,VCUG + RUG 与手术评估之间的狭窄长度测量值差异有统计学意义(P = 0.448):本研究表明,RUG + VCUG 可能会低估尿道狭窄,尤其是膜部和球部尿道狭窄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrograde urethrography (RUG) combined with voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) versus surgical findings in assessment of urethral strictures length.

Background and objective: Retrograde urethrography (RUG) combined with voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) is the most common and preferred imaging modality for evaluating urethral strictures, despite its well-known limitations and disadvantages. In this study, we assessed the clinical relevance of RUG + VCUG, along with intraoperative assessment in measuring male urethral strictures.

Method: This study was a single-center retrospective study involving 134 male patients diagnosed with urethral stricture disease. All participants underwent RUG + VCUG before the intervention, and the results were interpreted by a single radiologist. The location and length of urethral strictures were assessed. The accuracy of urethral stricture measurements obtained from combined VCUG and RUG imaging was compared to intraoperative measurements, which served as the reference standard. Urethral strictures were classified into three types: membranous and bulbomembranous, bulbar, and penile.

Results: A total of 130 patients were included (38.14 ± 12.05 years) in the study. For patients with membranous and bulbar strictures, there were statistically significant differences in stricture length measurements between VCUG + RUG and surgical evaluation (p < 0.05). However, for patients with penile strictures, the differences in stricture length measurements between VCUG + RUG and surgical evaluation were not statistically significant (p = 0.448).

Conclusion: This study suggests that RUG + VCUG may underestimate urethral stricture, particularly in the membranous and bulbar regions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urologia Journal
Urologia Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信