增强型胎儿生长超声检查方案对妊娠结局的影响:2014年至2022年间英国国民健康服务中心的一项回顾性服务评估。

IF 0.8 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Eleanor Butterfield, Emily Skelton
{"title":"增强型胎儿生长超声检查方案对妊娠结局的影响:2014年至2022年间英国国民健康服务中心的一项回顾性服务评估。","authors":"Eleanor Butterfield, Emily Skelton","doi":"10.1177/1742271X241287925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Growth Assessment Protocol is a fetal growth initiative designed to improve antenatal detection of babies who are small-for-gestational-age and reduce stillbirths. However, its direct impact on pregnancy outcome and stillbirth rates is questioned. This service evaluation aimed to assess Growth Assessment Protocol's influence on pregnancy outcomes at a National Health Service hospital.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Anonymous, maternity and ultrasound data, routinely acquired between 2014 and 2022 were extracted from clinical databases (Viewpoint, Euroking). Trends in maternity data and ultrasound scan volume were explored with descriptive statistics. Variables of stillbirth, antenatal small-for-gestational-age detection and scan volume were compared before and after Growth Assessment Protocol implementation. Associations between these variables were evaluated using Spearman's rho.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of babies born small-for-gestational-age reduced by 0.3% across the evaluation period. Antenatal small-for-gestational-age diagnosis rose from 4.1% to 14.3%. However, the number of false-positive cases of antenatally diagnosed small-for-gestational-age increased fivefold from 2.2% to 11.5%. Although stillbirth rates remained consistent post-Growth Assessment Protocol, complex scan volume (e.g. number of growth scans using Doppler) increased annually. The peak incline coincided with the Growth Assessment Protocol implementation period (2016-2018). Complex scan volume was significantly associated with overall small-for-gestational-age detection (rho = 0.8, <i>p</i> =< 0.001), but not with stillbirth frequency (rho = -0.1, <i>p</i> = 0.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Small-for-gestational-age detection increased following Growth Assessment Protocol implementation, although this was associated with a high false-positive rate and no reduction in stillbirths. The potential implications associated with clinical management, parent experiences and departmental workflow, alongside the benefits for stillbirth reduction, should be fully considered prior to the introduction of a new fetal growth initiative to the antenatal care pathway.</p>","PeriodicalId":23440,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":"1742271X241287925"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11563492/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of an enhanced fetal growth ultrasound protocol on pregnancy outcomes: A retrospective service evaluation within a single UK National Health Service centre between 2014 and 2022.\",\"authors\":\"Eleanor Butterfield, Emily Skelton\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1742271X241287925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Growth Assessment Protocol is a fetal growth initiative designed to improve antenatal detection of babies who are small-for-gestational-age and reduce stillbirths. However, its direct impact on pregnancy outcome and stillbirth rates is questioned. This service evaluation aimed to assess Growth Assessment Protocol's influence on pregnancy outcomes at a National Health Service hospital.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Anonymous, maternity and ultrasound data, routinely acquired between 2014 and 2022 were extracted from clinical databases (Viewpoint, Euroking). Trends in maternity data and ultrasound scan volume were explored with descriptive statistics. Variables of stillbirth, antenatal small-for-gestational-age detection and scan volume were compared before and after Growth Assessment Protocol implementation. Associations between these variables were evaluated using Spearman's rho.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of babies born small-for-gestational-age reduced by 0.3% across the evaluation period. Antenatal small-for-gestational-age diagnosis rose from 4.1% to 14.3%. However, the number of false-positive cases of antenatally diagnosed small-for-gestational-age increased fivefold from 2.2% to 11.5%. Although stillbirth rates remained consistent post-Growth Assessment Protocol, complex scan volume (e.g. number of growth scans using Doppler) increased annually. The peak incline coincided with the Growth Assessment Protocol implementation period (2016-2018). Complex scan volume was significantly associated with overall small-for-gestational-age detection (rho = 0.8, <i>p</i> =< 0.001), but not with stillbirth frequency (rho = -0.1, <i>p</i> = 0.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Small-for-gestational-age detection increased following Growth Assessment Protocol implementation, although this was associated with a high false-positive rate and no reduction in stillbirths. The potential implications associated with clinical management, parent experiences and departmental workflow, alongside the benefits for stillbirth reduction, should be fully considered prior to the introduction of a new fetal growth initiative to the antenatal care pathway.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1742271X241287925\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11563492/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1742271X241287925\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1742271X241287925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:胎儿生长评估方案是一项胎儿生长计划,旨在提高对胎龄偏小婴儿的产前检测率,减少死胎率。然而,它对妊娠结局和死胎率的直接影响却受到质疑。这项服务评估旨在评估生长评估方案对一家国民健康服务医院妊娠结局的影响:方法:从临床数据库(Viewpoint、Euroking)中提取 2014 年至 2022 年间常规获取的匿名产科和超声波数据。通过描述性统计分析了产科数据和超声波扫描量的变化趋势。比较了生长评估规程实施前后的死胎、产前小于妊娠年龄检测和扫描量等变量。使用斯皮尔曼 rho 对这些变量之间的关联进行了评估:结果:在整个评估期间,小于胎龄儿的比例降低了 0.3%。产前小于胎龄儿诊断率从 4.1%上升到 14.3%。然而,产前诊断为小于胎龄的假阳性病例增加了五倍,从 2.2%增至 11.5%。虽然死胎率在 "生长评估规程 "实施后保持不变,但复杂扫描量(如使用多普勒进行生长扫描的次数)却逐年增加。增长的高峰期与《生长评估规程》的实施期(2016-2018 年)相吻合。复杂扫描量与小于胎龄儿的总体检出率明显相关(rho = 0.8,p =< 0.001),但与死胎频率无关(rho = -0.1,p = 0.4):结论:实施生长评估方案后,小于胎龄儿的检出率有所提高,但假阳性率较高,死胎率没有降低。在产前护理路径中引入新的胎儿生长计划之前,应充分考虑与临床管理、家长体验和科室工作流程相关的潜在影响,以及减少死胎的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of an enhanced fetal growth ultrasound protocol on pregnancy outcomes: A retrospective service evaluation within a single UK National Health Service centre between 2014 and 2022.

Aim: Growth Assessment Protocol is a fetal growth initiative designed to improve antenatal detection of babies who are small-for-gestational-age and reduce stillbirths. However, its direct impact on pregnancy outcome and stillbirth rates is questioned. This service evaluation aimed to assess Growth Assessment Protocol's influence on pregnancy outcomes at a National Health Service hospital.

Method: Anonymous, maternity and ultrasound data, routinely acquired between 2014 and 2022 were extracted from clinical databases (Viewpoint, Euroking). Trends in maternity data and ultrasound scan volume were explored with descriptive statistics. Variables of stillbirth, antenatal small-for-gestational-age detection and scan volume were compared before and after Growth Assessment Protocol implementation. Associations between these variables were evaluated using Spearman's rho.

Results: The percentage of babies born small-for-gestational-age reduced by 0.3% across the evaluation period. Antenatal small-for-gestational-age diagnosis rose from 4.1% to 14.3%. However, the number of false-positive cases of antenatally diagnosed small-for-gestational-age increased fivefold from 2.2% to 11.5%. Although stillbirth rates remained consistent post-Growth Assessment Protocol, complex scan volume (e.g. number of growth scans using Doppler) increased annually. The peak incline coincided with the Growth Assessment Protocol implementation period (2016-2018). Complex scan volume was significantly associated with overall small-for-gestational-age detection (rho = 0.8, p =< 0.001), but not with stillbirth frequency (rho = -0.1, p = 0.4).

Conclusion: Small-for-gestational-age detection increased following Growth Assessment Protocol implementation, although this was associated with a high false-positive rate and no reduction in stillbirths. The potential implications associated with clinical management, parent experiences and departmental workflow, alongside the benefits for stillbirth reduction, should be fully considered prior to the introduction of a new fetal growth initiative to the antenatal care pathway.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ultrasound
Ultrasound RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Ultrasound is the official journal of the British Medical Ultrasound Society (BMUS), a multidisciplinary, charitable society comprising radiologists, obstetricians, sonographers, physicists and veterinarians amongst others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信