钙通道阻滞剂对经皮冠状动脉介入患者氯吡格雷抗血小板活性的影响:PTRG-DES 联合会的见解。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
HoungBeom Ahn, Hyun-Wook Chu, Ae-Young Her, Young-Hoon Jeong, Byeong-Keuk Kim, Hyung Joon Joo, Kiyuk Chang, Yongwhi Park, Sung Gyun Ahn, Sang Yeup Lee, Jung Rae Cho, Hyo-Soo Kim, Moo Hyun Kim, Do-Sun Lim, Eun-Seok Shin, Jung-Won Suh
{"title":"钙通道阻滞剂对经皮冠状动脉介入患者氯吡格雷抗血小板活性的影响:PTRG-DES 联合会的见解。","authors":"HoungBeom Ahn, Hyun-Wook Chu, Ae-Young Her, Young-Hoon Jeong, Byeong-Keuk Kim, Hyung Joon Joo, Kiyuk Chang, Yongwhi Park, Sung Gyun Ahn, Sang Yeup Lee, Jung Rae Cho, Hyo-Soo Kim, Moo Hyun Kim, Do-Sun Lim, Eun-Seok Shin, Jung-Won Suh","doi":"10.1177/10742484241298150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aims:</b> Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are frequently co-administered with clopidogrel in cardiovascular disease. Although an inhibitory drug interaction exists between them, comprehensive large-scale studies for its validation are lacking. We investigated interactions between CCBs and clopidogrel using a large-scale national registry of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). <b>Methods and Results:</b> The Platelet function and genoType-Related long-term Prognosis-Platelet Function Test consortium investigates the association between platelet function test and long-term prognosis during dual antiplatelet therapy including clopidogrel in patients using drug-eluting stents. We compared the <i>ex vivo</i> platelet reactivity using the VerifyNow P2Y12 test and clinical outcomes between CCB users and non-users. Between 2003 and 2018, 11 714 patients were enrolled and categorized into two groups according to CCB usage. A composite endpoint encompassing all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or stroke was defined as a major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE). During the 5-year follow-up period, no significant differences were observed in P2Y12 reaction units (215.8 ± 84.7 vs 218.4 ± 76.7, <i><u>P</u></i> = .156), MACCEs, major bleeding, or high platelet reactivity rates, even after adjusting for propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). When limited to the high platelet reactivity cohort (≥252 PRU), the results remained consistent for MACCE [PSM-adjusted, HR: 0.923 (0.644-1.323), <i><u>P</u></i>-value .663; IPTW-adjusted, HR: 1.300 (0.822-2.056), <i><u>P</u></i>-value .262]. <b>Conclusions:</b> CCB and clopidogrel co-administration does not appear to significantly impact clopidogrel responsiveness or clinical outcomes. Despite these promising results, further investigation may be warranted. <b>Clinical trial registration:</b> Platelet Function and genoType-Related Long-term progGosis in DES-treated Patients: A Consortium From Multi-centered Registries [PTRG-DES]; NCT04734028.</p>","PeriodicalId":15281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"29 ","pages":"10742484241298150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Calcium Channel Blockers on Antiplatelet Activity of Clopidogrel in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights from the PTRG-DES Consortium.\",\"authors\":\"HoungBeom Ahn, Hyun-Wook Chu, Ae-Young Her, Young-Hoon Jeong, Byeong-Keuk Kim, Hyung Joon Joo, Kiyuk Chang, Yongwhi Park, Sung Gyun Ahn, Sang Yeup Lee, Jung Rae Cho, Hyo-Soo Kim, Moo Hyun Kim, Do-Sun Lim, Eun-Seok Shin, Jung-Won Suh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10742484241298150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aims:</b> Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are frequently co-administered with clopidogrel in cardiovascular disease. Although an inhibitory drug interaction exists between them, comprehensive large-scale studies for its validation are lacking. We investigated interactions between CCBs and clopidogrel using a large-scale national registry of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). <b>Methods and Results:</b> The Platelet function and genoType-Related long-term Prognosis-Platelet Function Test consortium investigates the association between platelet function test and long-term prognosis during dual antiplatelet therapy including clopidogrel in patients using drug-eluting stents. We compared the <i>ex vivo</i> platelet reactivity using the VerifyNow P2Y12 test and clinical outcomes between CCB users and non-users. Between 2003 and 2018, 11 714 patients were enrolled and categorized into two groups according to CCB usage. A composite endpoint encompassing all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or stroke was defined as a major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE). During the 5-year follow-up period, no significant differences were observed in P2Y12 reaction units (215.8 ± 84.7 vs 218.4 ± 76.7, <i><u>P</u></i> = .156), MACCEs, major bleeding, or high platelet reactivity rates, even after adjusting for propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). When limited to the high platelet reactivity cohort (≥252 PRU), the results remained consistent for MACCE [PSM-adjusted, HR: 0.923 (0.644-1.323), <i><u>P</u></i>-value .663; IPTW-adjusted, HR: 1.300 (0.822-2.056), <i><u>P</u></i>-value .262]. <b>Conclusions:</b> CCB and clopidogrel co-administration does not appear to significantly impact clopidogrel responsiveness or clinical outcomes. Despite these promising results, further investigation may be warranted. <b>Clinical trial registration:</b> Platelet Function and genoType-Related Long-term progGosis in DES-treated Patients: A Consortium From Multi-centered Registries [PTRG-DES]; NCT04734028.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"29 \",\"pages\":\"10742484241298150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484241298150\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484241298150","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在心血管疾病中,钙通道阻滞剂(CCBs)经常与氯吡格雷合用。虽然它们之间存在抑制性药物相互作用,但目前还缺乏全面的大规模研究来验证这种相互作用。我们通过对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者进行大规模全国性登记,调查了 CCB 与氯吡格雷之间的相互作用。方法和结果:血小板功能和基因型相关长期预后--血小板功能测试联盟调查了使用药物洗脱支架的患者在接受包括氯吡格雷在内的双重抗血小板治疗期间,血小板功能测试与长期预后之间的关联。我们比较了使用 VerifyNow P2Y12 检验的体外血小板反应性和使用氯吡格雷者与未使用氯吡格雷者的临床预后。2003 年至 2018 年间,我们共招募了 11 714 名患者,并根据 CCB 使用情况将其分为两组。包括全因死亡率、心肌梗死、支架血栓或中风在内的复合终点被定义为主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)。在为期5年的随访期间,即使对倾向评分匹配(PSM)和逆治疗概率加权(IPTW)进行调整,也未观察到P2Y12反应单位(215.8 ± 84.7 vs 218.4 ± 76.7,P = .156)、MACCE、大出血或高血小板反应率存在显著差异。当局限于高血小板反应性队列(≥252 PRU)时,MACCE的结果仍然一致[PSM调整后,HR:0.923(0.644-1.323),P值.663;IPTW调整后,HR:1.300(0.822-2.056),P值.262]。结论CCB和氯吡格雷联合用药似乎不会对氯吡格雷的反应性或临床结果产生显著影响。尽管这些结果很有希望,但仍需进一步研究。临床试验注册:DES治疗患者的血小板功能和基因型相关的长期预后:A Consortium From Multi-centered Registries [PTRG-DES];NCT04734028。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Calcium Channel Blockers on Antiplatelet Activity of Clopidogrel in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights from the PTRG-DES Consortium.

Aims: Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are frequently co-administered with clopidogrel in cardiovascular disease. Although an inhibitory drug interaction exists between them, comprehensive large-scale studies for its validation are lacking. We investigated interactions between CCBs and clopidogrel using a large-scale national registry of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods and Results: The Platelet function and genoType-Related long-term Prognosis-Platelet Function Test consortium investigates the association between platelet function test and long-term prognosis during dual antiplatelet therapy including clopidogrel in patients using drug-eluting stents. We compared the ex vivo platelet reactivity using the VerifyNow P2Y12 test and clinical outcomes between CCB users and non-users. Between 2003 and 2018, 11 714 patients were enrolled and categorized into two groups according to CCB usage. A composite endpoint encompassing all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or stroke was defined as a major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE). During the 5-year follow-up period, no significant differences were observed in P2Y12 reaction units (215.8 ± 84.7 vs 218.4 ± 76.7, P = .156), MACCEs, major bleeding, or high platelet reactivity rates, even after adjusting for propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). When limited to the high platelet reactivity cohort (≥252 PRU), the results remained consistent for MACCE [PSM-adjusted, HR: 0.923 (0.644-1.323), P-value .663; IPTW-adjusted, HR: 1.300 (0.822-2.056), P-value .262]. Conclusions: CCB and clopidogrel co-administration does not appear to significantly impact clopidogrel responsiveness or clinical outcomes. Despite these promising results, further investigation may be warranted. Clinical trial registration: Platelet Function and genoType-Related Long-term progGosis in DES-treated Patients: A Consortium From Multi-centered Registries [PTRG-DES]; NCT04734028.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics (JCPT) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical application to cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics. Experimental studies focus on translational research. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信