缺氧条件下特定阻力训练方法处方变量对力量发展的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Cristina Benavente, Belén Feriche
{"title":"缺氧条件下特定阻力训练方法处方变量对力量发展的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Cristina Benavente, Belén Feriche","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2024.2425536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted focused on the impact of specific methodological prescription variables in resistance training (R<sub>T</sub>) programming on muscle strength under hypoxic conditions. Searches of Pubmed-Medline, Web of Science, Sport Discuss and the Cochrane Library compared the effect of R<sub>T</sub> on strength development under hypoxic (RTH) vs. normoxic (RTN) conditions through the 1-repetition maximum (1RM) test. Apart from the overall meta-analysis, several R<sub>T</sub> methodological prescription variables available in the included studies (set end point, total weekly training volume, type of exercise, region of the body measured or type of routine) were analysed. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The overall analyses showed trivial differences in 1RM favouring RTH over RTN (SMD = 0.18 [CI: 0.04; 0.31]; <i>p</i> = 0.030). Sub-analyses revealed that a R<sub>T</sub> programme of a non-full-body routine, including 9 or more sets per exercise/week of multi-joint exercises performed to non-failure, favoured RTH for enhancing 1RM (<i>p</i> < 0.10). In conclusion, the evidence ratified a trivial benefit of RTH over RTN for muscle strength gains after a R<sub>T</sub> period. However, the handling of specific R<sub>T</sub> methodological prescription variables can slightly improve strength development outcomes in hypoxia.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of specific resistance training methodological prescription variables on strength development under hypoxic conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Cristina Benavente, Belén Feriche\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02640414.2024.2425536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted focused on the impact of specific methodological prescription variables in resistance training (R<sub>T</sub>) programming on muscle strength under hypoxic conditions. Searches of Pubmed-Medline, Web of Science, Sport Discuss and the Cochrane Library compared the effect of R<sub>T</sub> on strength development under hypoxic (RTH) vs. normoxic (RTN) conditions through the 1-repetition maximum (1RM) test. Apart from the overall meta-analysis, several R<sub>T</sub> methodological prescription variables available in the included studies (set end point, total weekly training volume, type of exercise, region of the body measured or type of routine) were analysed. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The overall analyses showed trivial differences in 1RM favouring RTH over RTN (SMD = 0.18 [CI: 0.04; 0.31]; <i>p</i> = 0.030). Sub-analyses revealed that a R<sub>T</sub> programme of a non-full-body routine, including 9 or more sets per exercise/week of multi-joint exercises performed to non-failure, favoured RTH for enhancing 1RM (<i>p</i> < 0.10). In conclusion, the evidence ratified a trivial benefit of RTH over RTN for muscle strength gains after a R<sub>T</sub> period. However, the handling of specific R<sub>T</sub> methodological prescription variables can slightly improve strength development outcomes in hypoxia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2024.2425536\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2024.2425536","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,重点研究了阻力训练(RT)计划中特定方法处方变量对缺氧条件下肌肉力量的影响。通过对 Pubmed-Medline、Web of Science、Sport Discuss 和 Cochrane Library 的检索,比较了在缺氧(RTH)和常氧(RTN)条件下,通过 1 次重复最大值(1RM)测试,阻力训练对力量发展的影响。除了总体荟萃分析外,还对纳入研究中的几个 RT 方法处方变量(设定终点、每周训练总量、运动类型、测量的身体区域或常规类型)进行了分析。有 13 项研究符合纳入标准。总体分析表明,在 1RM 方面,RTH 比 RTN 的差异微不足道(SMD = 0.18 [CI: 0.04; 0.31]; p = 0.030)。子分析表明,非全身常规的 RT 计划(包括每次练习/周进行 9 组或更多的多关节练习,以达到不失败为目标)更有利于 RTH 提高 1RM (p T 期)。然而,处理特定的 RT 方法处方变量可略微改善缺氧条件下的力量发展结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The influence of specific resistance training methodological prescription variables on strength development under hypoxic conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted focused on the impact of specific methodological prescription variables in resistance training (RT) programming on muscle strength under hypoxic conditions. Searches of Pubmed-Medline, Web of Science, Sport Discuss and the Cochrane Library compared the effect of RT on strength development under hypoxic (RTH) vs. normoxic (RTN) conditions through the 1-repetition maximum (1RM) test. Apart from the overall meta-analysis, several RT methodological prescription variables available in the included studies (set end point, total weekly training volume, type of exercise, region of the body measured or type of routine) were analysed. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The overall analyses showed trivial differences in 1RM favouring RTH over RTN (SMD = 0.18 [CI: 0.04; 0.31]; p = 0.030). Sub-analyses revealed that a RT programme of a non-full-body routine, including 9 or more sets per exercise/week of multi-joint exercises performed to non-failure, favoured RTH for enhancing 1RM (p < 0.10). In conclusion, the evidence ratified a trivial benefit of RTH over RTN for muscle strength gains after a RT period. However, the handling of specific RT methodological prescription variables can slightly improve strength development outcomes in hypoxia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sports Sciences
Journal of Sports Sciences 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
147
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives. The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信