Marcos Quintana-Cepedal, Omar de la Calle, María Medina-Sánchez, Irene Crespo, Hugo Olmedillas
{"title":"哥本哈根内收训练对高水平青少年曲棍球运动员内收肌力量的剂量反应:三臂随机对照试验","authors":"Marcos Quintana-Cepedal, Omar de la Calle, María Medina-Sánchez, Irene Crespo, Hugo Olmedillas","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2024.2430875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this cluster-randomised controlled trial was to investigate the training and detraining effects of two different-volume Copenhagen Adduction Exercise (CAE) protocols on adductor squeeze strength. Thirty high-level rink hockey players (14 y.o.) were allocated to a warm-up low-volume (LVG), high-volume (HVG) protocol, or a control group. Adductor strength change was evaluated over a period of 11 weeks (eight of intervention + three of detraining). Adherence to the intervention and reporting of delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) were also collected. Adductor strength increase was significantly higher in HVG compared to LVG (+24%, mean difference 0.68 Nm/kg, <i>p</i> = 0.03) or controls (+34%, mean difference 0.9 Nm/kg, <i>p</i> = 0.009) at the end of the intervention. No significant strength drop was observed after three weeks of detraining in any group (-2.7% - 6%, <i>p</i> = 0.16 - 0.66), while HVG values were still significantly higher compared to controls (+27%, mean difference 0.71 Nm/kg, <i>p</i> = 0.027) at week 11. Compliance was identical in both intervention groups (LVG: 92.3%, HVG: 93.3%) and one case of DOMS was reported across 208 individual sessions (0.48%). The CAE protocol performed twice a week enhances squeeze strength to a further extent compared to one weekly session.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The dose-response of the Copenhagen adduction exercise on adductor strength in high-level youth hockey players: A three-arm randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Marcos Quintana-Cepedal, Omar de la Calle, María Medina-Sánchez, Irene Crespo, Hugo Olmedillas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02640414.2024.2430875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this cluster-randomised controlled trial was to investigate the training and detraining effects of two different-volume Copenhagen Adduction Exercise (CAE) protocols on adductor squeeze strength. Thirty high-level rink hockey players (14 y.o.) were allocated to a warm-up low-volume (LVG), high-volume (HVG) protocol, or a control group. Adductor strength change was evaluated over a period of 11 weeks (eight of intervention + three of detraining). Adherence to the intervention and reporting of delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) were also collected. Adductor strength increase was significantly higher in HVG compared to LVG (+24%, mean difference 0.68 Nm/kg, <i>p</i> = 0.03) or controls (+34%, mean difference 0.9 Nm/kg, <i>p</i> = 0.009) at the end of the intervention. No significant strength drop was observed after three weeks of detraining in any group (-2.7% - 6%, <i>p</i> = 0.16 - 0.66), while HVG values were still significantly higher compared to controls (+27%, mean difference 0.71 Nm/kg, <i>p</i> = 0.027) at week 11. Compliance was identical in both intervention groups (LVG: 92.3%, HVG: 93.3%) and one case of DOMS was reported across 208 individual sessions (0.48%). The CAE protocol performed twice a week enhances squeeze strength to a further extent compared to one weekly session.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2024.2430875\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2024.2430875","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The dose-response of the Copenhagen adduction exercise on adductor strength in high-level youth hockey players: A three-arm randomised controlled trial.
The aim of this cluster-randomised controlled trial was to investigate the training and detraining effects of two different-volume Copenhagen Adduction Exercise (CAE) protocols on adductor squeeze strength. Thirty high-level rink hockey players (14 y.o.) were allocated to a warm-up low-volume (LVG), high-volume (HVG) protocol, or a control group. Adductor strength change was evaluated over a period of 11 weeks (eight of intervention + three of detraining). Adherence to the intervention and reporting of delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) were also collected. Adductor strength increase was significantly higher in HVG compared to LVG (+24%, mean difference 0.68 Nm/kg, p = 0.03) or controls (+34%, mean difference 0.9 Nm/kg, p = 0.009) at the end of the intervention. No significant strength drop was observed after three weeks of detraining in any group (-2.7% - 6%, p = 0.16 - 0.66), while HVG values were still significantly higher compared to controls (+27%, mean difference 0.71 Nm/kg, p = 0.027) at week 11. Compliance was identical in both intervention groups (LVG: 92.3%, HVG: 93.3%) and one case of DOMS was reported across 208 individual sessions (0.48%). The CAE protocol performed twice a week enhances squeeze strength to a further extent compared to one weekly session.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives.
The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.