从麻醉科过渡到急诊科,对农村创伤患者进行气道管理。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Joshua Carroll MD , Robert J. Behm MD , Zachary E. Dewar MD , Gregory Christiansen DO , Bryant Morocho MD , Kelly Roach DO , Ronel Ankam , Steven L. Casos MD
{"title":"从麻醉科过渡到急诊科,对农村创伤患者进行气道管理。","authors":"Joshua Carroll MD ,&nbsp;Robert J. Behm MD ,&nbsp;Zachary E. Dewar MD ,&nbsp;Gregory Christiansen DO ,&nbsp;Bryant Morocho MD ,&nbsp;Kelly Roach DO ,&nbsp;Ronel Ankam ,&nbsp;Steven L. Casos MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>When our rural trauma center first became certified in 1986, the Emergency Department (ED) was a mix of board-certified Emergency Medicine (EM) and Family Medicine trained physicians each with various degrees of airway experience. Therefore, Anesthesia providers had provided airway management during trauma activations for decades. Recently, our institution saw dramatic growth in the ED which is now staffed by board certified EM physicians and complemented by an EM residency program. This prompted the institution to enact a policy change transitioning airway management during trauma activations from Anesthesiology to EM. The authors hypothesized that this policy change was not associated with a reduced rate of successful first pass intubations in trauma patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was performed of all trauma activations requiring intubation from March 1, 2018, to January 31, 2023. The ED assumed responsibility for airway management March 1, 2021. These patients were then divided into two groups; the pregroup, representing airways managed by Anesthesiology, and the postgroup representing airways managed by EM. The primary outcome was the rate of successful intubation performed on the first pass. Secondary outcomes included periprocedural vital signs and presence of airway management associated complication.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The pregroup included 71 patients while the postgroup included 58 patients with full documentation meeting our criteria. We found no difference in the rate of successful first pass intubations between the pregroup and postgroup (85.90% <em>versus</em> 87.9%, <em>P</em> = 0.736). Both groups had 100% intubation success rates on the second pass. There were no significant differences between groups across the majority of secondary outcomes measured.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The transition in airway management of the trauma patient from anesthesiology to the ED in a rural Level II trauma center found no difference regarding successful first pass intubations in the trauma bay.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"304 ","pages":"Pages 207-211"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transitioning From Anesthesia to Emergency Medicine for Airway Management in Rural Trauma Patients\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Carroll MD ,&nbsp;Robert J. Behm MD ,&nbsp;Zachary E. Dewar MD ,&nbsp;Gregory Christiansen DO ,&nbsp;Bryant Morocho MD ,&nbsp;Kelly Roach DO ,&nbsp;Ronel Ankam ,&nbsp;Steven L. Casos MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>When our rural trauma center first became certified in 1986, the Emergency Department (ED) was a mix of board-certified Emergency Medicine (EM) and Family Medicine trained physicians each with various degrees of airway experience. Therefore, Anesthesia providers had provided airway management during trauma activations for decades. Recently, our institution saw dramatic growth in the ED which is now staffed by board certified EM physicians and complemented by an EM residency program. This prompted the institution to enact a policy change transitioning airway management during trauma activations from Anesthesiology to EM. The authors hypothesized that this policy change was not associated with a reduced rate of successful first pass intubations in trauma patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was performed of all trauma activations requiring intubation from March 1, 2018, to January 31, 2023. The ED assumed responsibility for airway management March 1, 2021. These patients were then divided into two groups; the pregroup, representing airways managed by Anesthesiology, and the postgroup representing airways managed by EM. The primary outcome was the rate of successful intubation performed on the first pass. Secondary outcomes included periprocedural vital signs and presence of airway management associated complication.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The pregroup included 71 patients while the postgroup included 58 patients with full documentation meeting our criteria. We found no difference in the rate of successful first pass intubations between the pregroup and postgroup (85.90% <em>versus</em> 87.9%, <em>P</em> = 0.736). Both groups had 100% intubation success rates on the second pass. There were no significant differences between groups across the majority of secondary outcomes measured.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The transition in airway management of the trauma patient from anesthesiology to the ED in a rural Level II trauma center found no difference regarding successful first pass intubations in the trauma bay.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"volume\":\"304 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 207-211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480424006760\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480424006760","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:1986 年,当我们的农村创伤中心首次获得认证时,急诊科(ED)是由经过认证的急诊医学(EM)和全科医学培训的医生组成的,每个医生都具有不同程度的气道经验。因此,几十年来,麻醉服务提供者一直在创伤启动期间提供气道管理服务。最近,我们医院的急诊科急剧发展,现在急诊科的工作人员都是经过认证的急诊科医生,并辅以急诊科住院医师培训项目。这促使该机构制定了一项政策变革,将创伤启动期间的气道管理从麻醉科转到了急诊科。作者假设这一政策变化与创伤患者首次插管成功率降低无关:作者对 2018 年 3 月 1 日至 2023 年 1 月 31 日期间所有需要插管的外伤患者进行了回顾性分析。2021 年 3 月 1 日,急诊室开始负责气道管理。然后将这些患者分为两组:前组代表由麻醉科管理的气道,后组代表由急诊科管理的气道。主要结果是首次插管成功率。次要结果包括围手术期生命体征和气道管理相关并发症:前组包括 71 名患者,后组包括 58 名符合我们标准的完整记录的患者。我们发现前组和后组的首次插管成功率没有差异(85.90% 对 87.9%,P = 0.736)。两组的第二次插管成功率均为 100%。在测量的大多数次要结果中,两组间无明显差异:结论:在一个农村二级创伤中心,创伤患者的气道管理从麻醉科过渡到急诊室,在创伤室首次插管成功率方面没有发现差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transitioning From Anesthesia to Emergency Medicine for Airway Management in Rural Trauma Patients

Introduction

When our rural trauma center first became certified in 1986, the Emergency Department (ED) was a mix of board-certified Emergency Medicine (EM) and Family Medicine trained physicians each with various degrees of airway experience. Therefore, Anesthesia providers had provided airway management during trauma activations for decades. Recently, our institution saw dramatic growth in the ED which is now staffed by board certified EM physicians and complemented by an EM residency program. This prompted the institution to enact a policy change transitioning airway management during trauma activations from Anesthesiology to EM. The authors hypothesized that this policy change was not associated with a reduced rate of successful first pass intubations in trauma patients.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed of all trauma activations requiring intubation from March 1, 2018, to January 31, 2023. The ED assumed responsibility for airway management March 1, 2021. These patients were then divided into two groups; the pregroup, representing airways managed by Anesthesiology, and the postgroup representing airways managed by EM. The primary outcome was the rate of successful intubation performed on the first pass. Secondary outcomes included periprocedural vital signs and presence of airway management associated complication.

Results

The pregroup included 71 patients while the postgroup included 58 patients with full documentation meeting our criteria. We found no difference in the rate of successful first pass intubations between the pregroup and postgroup (85.90% versus 87.9%, P = 0.736). Both groups had 100% intubation success rates on the second pass. There were no significant differences between groups across the majority of secondary outcomes measured.

Conclusions

The transition in airway management of the trauma patient from anesthesiology to the ED in a rural Level II trauma center found no difference regarding successful first pass intubations in the trauma bay.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信